laurence norman Profile picture
Sep 5 8 tweets 2 min read
A couple of new tidbits on #IranTalks. My understanding is that while #Iran is seeking a change to the safeguards text the EU offered, that's mainly on intended date to close probe by Confirmation Day. It is not explicitly seeking upfront guarantee that probe will be closed. -1-
Separately, my understanding is that all excess centrifuges of type mentioned as permissible in deal (IR-1, IR-2, IR-2M, IR-4/6/8) will be removed and kept under seal whole. Only the experimental centrifuges of other types (IR-9s) will be effectively dismantled.-2-
Also interesting: @iaeaorg will only have 60 days (confirmation day to reimplementation day) to examine 18+ months of camera footage and monitoring data from Iran that they didn't receive since Feb 2021. And reconstruct what happened at facilities where cameras removed in June-3-
Iran could allow an earlier release of the footage. But don't hold your breath. -4-
And Iran will only have to remove centrifuges and infrastructure in the 45 days between Reimplementation Day and Conclusion day at the end of the 165 day process. That's when economic benefits are supposed to start flowing. -5-
Source expressed concern about these arrangements. The deal as nearly concluded in March based on the benefits/costs for each side at that point. Since then, Iran produced unknown numbers of advanced machines which won't be dismantled. -6-
That will reduce Breakout time and increase Iran's future capabilities. That's changing the Balance of the agreement. Iran would no doubt argue that sanctions have continued & thus their costs increased. But Iran can sell produced oil. Centrifuges remain in tact.-7-
Also a rough source calculation of enriched production capacity if all new centrifuges (again numbers unknown because no cameras/data) come on line from source that Iran could produce 1000 kg/month of 5%. That's around 600 kg of weapons grade fuel. Enough for many nukes/year.-8-

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with laurence norman

laurence norman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @laurnorman

Aug 29
What’s interesting in Raisi safeguards comments today is not only is he doubling down on Iran threat not to re-implement deal if safeguards probe isn’t closed, there’s a hint here he’s unhappy with safeguards language in the EU text & wants to push again for a guarantee. -1-
It may be he doesn’t have full grasp on issue so is being imprecise or is trying to look as if he’s standing up for Iran’s interests even though Iran team did NOT take issue with the safeguards language in their response to EU two weeks ago. But here’s the translation I have -2-
“The safeguard is a principle. **All the safeguard issues should be resolved as a principle in the talks. Without resolving the safeguard issues, an agreement doesn’t make sense.**The agreement should put an end to the safeguard issues, and other issues that Iran is pursuing.”-3-
Read 4 tweets
Aug 28
Yeah, because what joy and prosperity Iran’s guns and money have created in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq.
Lots of reax to this tweet. Some positive, some very negative. I don't know of many who would argue west's interventions in MidEast over recent decades have been a striking success. Libya good example. -1-
But doesn't change fact that where Iran interferes - Lebanon, supporting the murderous Assad, Yemen, Iraq - paralysis & violence usually follow or deepen and the country's sovereignty, often already eroded, collapses. It's a point many western critics prefer to ignore.-2-
Read 4 tweets
Aug 24
What did Iran most resent about JCPOA? The slow economic benefits it generated because of extreme caution by western banks/firms. What has it pressed for most in current negotiations? Multiple economic guarantees and assurances that it won't happen again - or at least that -1-
it won't be as slow as last time. What are the biggest threats to that? 1/ Republican majority congress and presidency in 2025. 2/ The threat of renewed non-nuclear sanctions vs Iran firms/banks. Needn't be more than a few sanctions targets to chill western economic ties. -2-
Why was Russia's sanctions economic guarantee demands a show-stopper in March? wsj.com/articles/iran-… Because US officials made clear they wouldn't sit by and allow JCPOA to undercut Russia sanctions. wsj.com/articles/u-s-w… -3-
Read 4 tweets
Aug 23
This is such an important point. So I repeat it. We know and have known for a week that Iran didn't include safeguards in its list of issues it was concerned about in its response to EU text on Aug 15. Implying that it could live with the new safeguards language in text.BUT...-1-
that is ABSOLUTELY NOT the same as saying that Iran has dropped its demand that probe must be closed if deal is to be reimplemented. If the US know Iran has dropped this stance, that's significant. But the Iranian negotiating team is denying that on record. -2-
Finally. Yes, it's also important if Iran is no longer insisting on an upfront guarantee that safeguards will be closed before deal resurrected. We all said that last week. But that's still not same as saying we know Iran would complete reimplementation of deal if probe open. -3-
Read 4 tweets
Aug 22
Some really strong comments today from @rafaelmgrossi to @BeckyCNN on the Iran probe and what he wants to see. But also a significant fudge. Grossi says the Agency will not drop the probe unless Iran offers full cooperation. "People say, "are you prepared to drop it?" Well... -1-
"the key to this lies in one simple thing: will Iran cooperate with us? Give us the necessary answers, information, access to people and places so that we can clarify the very things that are still in need for clarification." My emphasis: people and places. -2-
Continues that people say the Agency is political, a view he says is "unacceptable." Continues: "we have an obligation - a legal obligation - which is to clarify many things that Iran has still to clarify." My emphasis "Many Things." -3-
Read 5 tweets
Aug 22
At a press conference on sidelines of the Quo Vadis seminar in Spain, @JosepBorrellF gave a little insight on #IranDeal negotiations during a press conference a few minutes ago. Translated from Spanish he said that after circulating his proposal on the final text... -1-
"There was an Iranian response that I think was reasonable." That was transmitted to U.S. and the U.S. has not yet responded. "We are awaiting its response and I hope that this response will allow us to complete the negotiations. I hope for that but I can't assure you of it"-2-
"The response was supposed to have come already. A meeting was foreseen in Vienna towards the end of last week. It wasn't possible. It's possible that happens during this week." -3-
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(