Special CBI Court, Rouse Avenue to hear bail application filed by AAP minister Satyendra Jain in a #MoneyLaundering case.
Special Judge CBI asks ASG SV Raju to clarify on several issues including what is the evidence to show that the money belong to Satyendra Jain, what is to show that Jain was a beneficiary, etc.
ASG Raju submits that our case is not that he is a share holders and that is why he is the beneficiary. We are arguing on De-facto Control. There are many cases wherein drivers, etc. have been made share holders. #SatyendraJain
ASG Raju: The disclosure is of about Rs. 16 Crores and there are findings of Benami transaction.
ASG Raju referring to a convenience compilation submitted that Satyendra Jain was in De-facto Control of these companies and these two people were just dummies. Prosecution may prove its case on direct evidences and circumstantial evidences. #SatyendraJain
ASG Raju: On 27 June 2018 Satyendra Jain wrote a letter to the Asst. Commissioner Income Tax, he was required to deposit 20% of the demanded tax. It was said, it can be adjusted from companies of Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain. It was all his money. #satyendrajain
ASG Raju: Who would allow it unless he is a Satyendra Jain's dummy? They are two sides of the same coin.
ASG Raju further submitted that another argument that was made is that he was threatened to be arrested, he was not threatened to be beaten and all and I'm my opinion, threat to be arrested does not amount to coercion or a threat.
ASG Raju referring to Satyendra Jain's wife, his wife used to sign documents on instructions of Vaibhav Jain, that means Vaibhav was a person of great trust. #SatyendraJain
After Satyendra Jain seized to be the Director, a meeting was held after he became the Minister wherein it was decided that the money would be paid by Satyendra Jain.
Counsel Appearing for Satyendra Jain said it says Satyendra Jain and his Associates.
Court: Who is cheated?
ASG Raju: The company was cheated.
Court: The company belongs to him only...
ASG Raju: Your Honour, a company is a separate legal entity.
ASG Raju: As per my investigation the entire thing was done by Mr Satyendra Jain. #SatyendraJain
Court: As per you, the companies are cheated and the same have been made accused in your complaint. So, they were laundering the money through which they themselves have been cheated.
ASG Raju: No!
ASG Raju (ED): I'm not bound with the quantum and quantity given in the chargesheet by the CBI, it may change at the time of framing of charge. To hold me at this stage with the CBI's chargesheet is not fair in my opinion.
ASG Raju: As far as tampering of evidence is concerned he is influential. Vaibhav Jain retracted his statements. It may not have any affect, but what is relevant is that an attempt has been made for the tampering with the evidences on this ground the bail should be rejected.
ASG Raju: There is evidence to show that he is capable of...when in 2018 he was in jail, Vaibhav Jain retracted his statements.
ASG Raju has concluded his statements.
The Court has allowed counsel for Satyendra Jain to argue on Tuesday 2:30 PM ime September 13, 2022.
"Satyendra Jain Was In De-Facto Control Of Shell Companies": ASG SV Raju (ED) Concludes Arguments Against AAP Minister's Bail Plea In Money Laundering Case @Gautam_Adv28 reports
#LucknowHotelFire: Allahabad High Court takes suo moto cognizance of the massive fire incident at Lucknow's Levana Suites on Monday that left four people dead, while at least 11 others were hospitalised with burn injuries #allahabadhighcourt
Court has expressed 'surprise' over the fact that the hotel was in possession of NOC of fire
department even when there was a clear lack of fire escape
management system and violation of several fire related safety rules
on its part.
While directing Vice-Chairman of the Lucknow Development Authority to file an affidavit detailing the number of
establishments which are operating without proper building and fire permits in Lucknow, court has sought his presence on the next date of listing as well #allahabadhc
BREAKING: Daughter of Royal Family of Kashi's head files Intervention application in plea challenging the Places of Worship Act; seeks reclamation of the alleged illegal structure, Razia Mosque, which is claimed to be the original site of #KashiVishwanathMandir
As per the intervention application, Razia Mosque was built by Qutub-ud-Din Aibak in 1194 C.E. after the destruction of the #KashiVishwanathMandir
In addition to the Razia Mosque, the royal family also seeks reclamation of the Dhaurahra Mosque which was built by #Aurangzeb after the destruction of the Bindu Madhav Mandir in 1682 at the Panchaganga Ghat in Varanasi.
🚨Will the Hijab be allowed in Pre-University institutions?
Supreme Court will hear the plea(s) challenging the Order of Karnataka HC upholding the prohibition on wearing of headscarves in Pre-University institutions #SupremeCourt
Live Updates
Justice Gupta: Yes Mr Kamat I think you should be a little concise
Counsel: Yes your honour
Justice Gupta: But if all of you argue for that long together then…?!
Justice Gupta while reading the provision Counsel referred to: Counsel Is there any religion of the State?
Counsel: No your honour.
#SupremeCourt hears plea by Mohd Zubair challenging Allahabad High Court's order refusing to quash FIR registered against him in Hatemonger Tweet Case.
Petitioner tells Court that this matter should also be transferred to Delhi jurisdiction.
Justice Chandrachud asks AAG Garima Parshad if all other cases against Mohd. Zubair have been transferred to the Delhi High Court.
🚨 #DelhiHighCourt to continue hearing bail plea of Umar Khalid, accused of larger conspiracy cases concerning #DelhiRiots of 2020. The plea is a challenge to a Delhi court order which found his role in the Delhi Riots conspiracy “apparent”, rejecting his bail plea
Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad continues arguing. The bench has asked him to conclude his arguments today.
🚨 #DelhiHighCourt to hear bail plea of Umar Khalid, accused of larger conspiracy cases concerning #DelhiRiots of 2020. The plea is a challenge to a Delhi court order which found his role in the Delhi Riots conspiracy “apparent”, rejecting his bail plea.
Earlier, Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad had informed the Court that WhatsApp group chats show that the Shaheen Bagh was not an organic protest site, it was a created protest site, and the people were mobilized.