WILL THERE BE A SETTLEMENT IN @SECGov 🆚 @Ripple?

I’ve maintained for more than a year that settlement is 💯 dependent on whether the @SECGov must turn over the Hinman speech drafts, edits, emails and comments thereof.
Other than having to produce the emails and drafts, another event that could facilitate a settlement is if the SEC receives a disfavorable decision in the @LBRYcom case.

I’ve become more convinced that there will be no settlement unless one or both of those things happen.
First of all, my opinion regarding settlement is no better or more relevant than anyone else’s opinion. The fact that I’m amicus counsel places me in no better position to speculate than anyone else. I’m just sharing my observations b/c I’m receiving many emails and DMs asking.
On January 1, 2021, only 9 days after the Ripple case was filed, I filed the Writ of Mandamus and stated in the Petition that the lawsuit 🆚 Ripple - alleging ALL #XRP are illegal securities - made no sense unless it was filed for one of the following reasons:
1) The lawsuit was personal and a form of political revenge from Clayton;

2) The lawsuit was a weapon to slow adoption and filed for personal gain in order for a select few to benefit financially; or,
3) The lawsuit was filed w/ such over-broad and sweeping allegations (ie claiming secondary market #XRP traded independent of @Ripple are also securities) as a form of regulation by enforcement w/ the intent of coming after all of crypto - a jurisdictional land grab by the SEC.
@GaryGensler and the @SECGov are not going to settle until the political risks outweigh the political benefits. Right now, I think Gensler believes that he doesn’t have much to lose by not settling.
In fact, if the SEC were to win Summary Judgment in both the @LBRYcom and @Ripple cases, it would provide Gensler the validation that most tokens are securities and justification that they must be regulated by the @SECGov.
Right now the political environment seems to favor the @CFTC as the regulator of choice for Crypto. @POTUS’s Executive Order gave limited input or jurisdiction to the SEC. Republicans in the @FinancialCmte and Senate favor the CFTC. @SenLummis @SenGillibrand bill favors CFTC.
If Gensler were to get a victory in the LBRY case and the Ripple case, he might be able to swing political sentiment towards the SEC. He could say: “two federal judges agree that these tokens are securities.”
If Judge 👩‍⚖️ Torres concludes #XRP is a security, Gensler and the SEC will sound like today’s #XRPHolder. For two years we’ve been saying to the Crypto World that if #XRP is a security, then every Altcoin in existence w/the exception of a few are also securities (including #ETH).
SEC REFUSED to settle LBRY. @jeremykauffman offered EVERYTHING - except registering today’s #LBC a security. He offered to dissolve the LBRY company and sell his assets at auction. The SEC even conceded that the majority of today’s LBC purchasers are USERS, but REFUSE to settle.
Ripple offered to settle before the lawsuit was filed and agreed to pay a fine and penalties related to sales in the early years AND w/the SEC not agreeing to give clarity for today’s #XRP. In other words, Ripple would pay a substantial amount of 💰 and live w/the status quo.
BUT THE SEC REFUSED.

Furthermore, acting as temporary Chairwoman of the SEC, @SECHerrenLee discontinued the use of conditional settlement offers. IMO, that was a decision directed at hindering any potential settlement with Ripple and other Crypto platforms.
Think about it: Why would you do away with a practice that helps facilitate settlements?

With the Ripple and LBRY cases pending, the SEC filed the Wahi case claiming 9 tokens sold by these INDIVIDUALS are securities. 🤔

Then comes the filing of the @dragonchain case.
The CEO of @dragonchain, after spending $2-4M in legal fees over a 4 year investigation, was told the investigation was over and he was free. On the eve of the statute of limitations expiring, no longer represented by counsel, the SEC filed the case claiming #DRGN is a security.
There are cases now pending in the first, second and ninth circuits, in addition to Wahi. Gensler has made clear that the exchanges are next, as I predicted almost a year ago. A plan is being executed, step by step.
Here is a breakdown of the scenarios that will dictate a settlement 🆚 a decision on summary judgment.
Scenario One:

SEC receives a victorious ruling from Judge Torres overturning Judge Netburn’s Order that the SEC must turn over the emails, comments, drafts and edits.

Result:

No settlement. Summary Judgment Decision.

Odds of Scenario One happening: 5%
Scenario Two:

Judge Torres Affirms Judge Netburn’s decision and orders the documents turned over.

Result:

The SEC seeks certification for an interlocutory appeal to the 2nd Circuit. I don’t believe Judge Torres will certify. The SEC seeks a Writ of Mandamus.
A lot depends on timing. If Judge Torres’ ruling that the documents must be turned over is very soon, it’s possible the SEC’s delay tactics could run out of time by the end of the year, forcing a settlement. If her ruling takes a long time, the daly tactics run the 🕰
If the LBRY decision comes down as a complete victory for the SEC, it bolsters Gensler’s confidence. If the SEC loses LBRY outright, it favors a settlement w/ Ripple. Get a big settlement number without risking a huge loss and continue terrorizing and extorting other platforms.
Conventional wisdom is that if LBRY can’t get a total victory, we hope the Judge splits the baby and says specific sales to an investment club when the platform had only a few videos and users was a securities offering but the token today is not a security.
Everyone needs to accept the fact that if the Ripple or LBRY cases were ONLY about enforcing securities laws, the cases would have settled long ago. This is about Gensler crushing the Crypto market in an effort to slow down adoption so that the incumbents can get a bigger slice.
Almost a year ago, I tweeted out @BrianBrooksUS could settle the Ripple #XRP case in 15 mins and then spend more time deciding what to eat for lunch. Read how Brian responded.👇

I hope I’m wrong and I’m grossly underestimating the chances for a settlement.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John E Deaton (213K Followers Beware Imposters)

John E Deaton (213K Followers Beware Imposters) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnEDeaton1

Sep 10
A year ago I was hesitant and careful to not accuse Hinman of actually breaking the law. Like @CGasparino and @EleanorTerrett, I gave him the benefit of the doubt, plus you shouldn’t impugn someone’s reputation unless you have clear irrefutable proof he/she violated the law. 👇
But see yourself👇Hinman was warned by SEC Ethics that he was BARRED by the financial criminal conflict statute from engaging in ANY contact w/his partners at Simpson Thacher. What everyone needs to understand is that this was a STRICT ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION
crypto-law.us/wp-content/upl…
What this meant was ABSOLUTELY NO CONTACT. No emails, phone calls, lunches or meetings where his law firm would be present.

The law makes it a crime for Hinman to have ANY contact whatsoever b/c if he creates “even an appearance of impropriety” it is a violation of the law.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 10
When I filed the motion to intervene in @SECGov 🆚 @Ripple on behalf of #XRPHolders, I used @Spend_The_Bits as a great example of why the Judge 👩‍⚖️ must allow us to be heard in the case.

@Jay_SpendDBits WITHOUT any help or 💰 from Ripple developed a payment app utilizing #XRPL.
#SpendTheBits will also be referenced in our Amicus Brief. According to Jay Kambo, @bgarlinghouse @chrislarsensf and @JoelKatz were completely unaware of who he was or of his idea to develop a payment app that allows you to spend your #Bitcoin JUST AS Satoshi Nakamoto envisioned.
That’s the beauty of the underlying technology. The #XRPLedger is an open permission-less distributed ledger technology - emphasis on “open and permission-less.”

Jay Kambo didn’t ask for permission - he just started building.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 10
On January 1, 2021 - 9 days after the @SECGov sued @Ripple claiming ALL #XRP are securities including XRP sold independent of Ripple, I sued the SEC and argued the following:

“The issue before the Court and the public is that if the SEC actually attempts to incorporate [SEC’s]
public definitions and argue that today’s XRP is a security, it is a slippery slope that the SEC is going down. If the SEC does not amend its Complaint to only include alleging that specific XRP distributions, made by Ripple or its Executives, in the early days of Ripple and XRP,
then the entire Digital Asset Industry is on notice that the SEC could be coming for your Crypto next. This regulation by enforcement approach applied to Crypto, almost a decade later, must not be allowed by the Courts.”

-Deaton 🆚 @SECGov, Writ of Mandamus, January 1, 2021.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 8
@GaryGensler has the @Ripple #XRP case pending in the 2nd Circuit in SDNY, the @LBRYcom #LBC case in the 1st Circuit in N.H., and the @dragonchain #DRGN case in the 9th Circuit in Wa. He is now also suing individuals for selling 9 tokens as unregistered securities in Wahi case.
In the Ripple case the SEC has declared all #XRP, including #XRP traded in the secondary market independent of Ripple, securities. The token itself is a security per se.
In the LBRY case the SEC argued utility is irrelevant and even if 90% of the token holders acquired #LBC for non-investment use, if one person expected a profit all LBC are securities.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 18
Dear @VitalikButerin:

The more I think about your shameful and disgusting comment👇 and considering you haven’t deleted or clarified it, I realize you didn’t misspeak.

This was an immature hateful comment directed at a community of innocent digital asset holders and NOT @Ripple
Many people will not pay your comment much attention. But for those of us who’ve been exhaustingly fighting tribalism and believe in a multi-chain world of interoperability, your comments are truly demoralizing.
If you would’ve said Ripple lost its right to protection, I wouldn’t comment, whether I agree w/it or not. Ripple can defend itself. But even quite possibly Ripple’s biggest critic, @twobitidiot, has recognized the SEC’s overreach and has stated he hopes Ripple defeats the SEC.
Read 18 tweets
Aug 5
A SYNOPSIS OF THE @SECGov 🆚 @LBRYcom SUMMARY JUDGMENT TRANSCRIPT.

As I said during @CryptoLawUS’s livestream after watching the SEC 🆚 LBRY Summary Judgment argument below is my single biggest criticism and observation along with direct quotes from the hearing.
The Judge 👨‍⚖️ asked the SEC’s lawyer:

“Do you concede that there is what I think LBRY is calling a consumptive use for #LBC?”

SEC Lawyer:

“We do, your honor. Not for the entire time of the offering.”
The COURT:

“When does something that has a consumptive use and that LBRY would say is a commodity shade into a security?”

SEC Lawyer:

“Well, your Honor, I first would say you don’t start with the presumption that something is a commodity. You apply the Howey test first.”
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(