Since 1972, Congress has interpreted "sex" under #TitleIX as allowing differential treatment based on sex in some settings, including single-sex athletics, toilets, locker rooms, & showers. These exist to ensure women have safe, equal access to educ. opportunities. #SexNotGender
Single-sex provisions are critical for safety, dignity & fairness, esp. for women and girls seeking to avoid or heal from male violence. Now, the Dept proposes rules that grant males access to female-only spaces based on self-declared “gender identity." #SexNotGender#TitleIX
#TitleIX prohibition of sex discrimination covers same-sex attraction, sex-related characteristics such as pregnancy, & sex-stereotype nonconformity. But it's impossible to protect people on basis of these characteristics while also protecting "gender identity." #SexNotGender
The #TitleIX proposal does not define "sex" or "gender identity," resulting in rules that are confusing and contradictory. Sex is a biological characteristic. Gender is a subjective feeling.
Women have fought for single-sex spaces where they have some measure of dignity, privacy, and protection from sexual abuse by males. Allowing men to access these spaces based on “gender identity” diminishes women's safety to accommodate men's feelings.
Many millions of people are affected by these proposed rules, including almost all institutions that provide educational opportunities, such as public schools, private schools, libraries, and juvenile justice facilities.
#TitleIX is a bedrock civil rights statute that has made great progress toward removing discriminatory barriers to educational programs; it helped women and girls achieve wonderful advances during its five decades of existence.
#TitleIX has enabled women and girls to overcome discrimination "on the basis of sex" during its five decades of existence. Equating sex with "gender identity" in the following provisions is therefore a step backward for women's rights:
Redefining the scope of Title IX as including “gender identity,” giving “gender identity” coequal status with sex, under proposed 34 C.F.R. § 106.10.
Making it a violation of Title IX for funding recipients to maintain single-sex spaces, athletics, or other activities or programs where “sex” is understood to mean the distinction between male and female, under proposed 34 C.F.R. § 106.31(a)(2).
Dictating that recipients must allow self-identification of sex and self-identification of “gender identity” for pre-employment and pre-application inquiries under proposed 34 C.F.R. § 106.21(c)(2)(iii) and proposed § 106.60(d).
Granting legal protections for “gender identity” at the expense of longstanding protections sex-based rights and protections, contrary to the text and legislative purpose of Title IX, under proposed 34 C.F.R. § 106.31(a)(2).
Creating a strong likelihood that people will be silenced or punished under the expanded definition of sex-based harassment under proposed 34 C.F.R. § 106.2, in light of proposal to protect “gender identity” under proposed §§ 106.10 & 106.31(a)(2).
Failing to properly consider and weigh the costs of the proposed regulations on different categories of people, including differential benefits and costs to males versus females, and to people who self-identify as "transgender" versus those who do not.
Failing to consider how all of the proposed “gender identity” provisions will complicate or impede the ability of juvenile justice facilities to comply with legal requirements under the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA).
It is consistent with #TitleIX to prohibit sex discrimination as to same-sex attraction, sex characteristics, and sex-stereotype nonconformity. However, the proposed "gender identity" rules are contrary to Title IX, and harm the interests of women and girls.
This week, ACLU filed a Motion to Intervene in WoLF’s California lawsuit challenging SB 132, which allows men who self-identify as women into women-only prisons: womensliberationfront.org/news/aclu-move… 1/6
Lambda Legal, the Transgender Law Center, and the ACLU foundations of Northern California and Southern California are representing four incarcerated men along with the Transgender Gender-Variant & Intersex Justice Project (“TGIJP”). 2/6
The ACLU objects to the state’s choice to slow the transfer the more than 300 men who have sought transfer to women’s facilities, one-third of whom are sex offenders (though the ACLU denies this documented, material fact in its court pleadings). 3/6
2/9 Dr. Devin Buckley, a feminist philosopher and WoLF board member, was scheduled to speak at Harvard University on her cutting-edge work on British Romanticism and philosophy.
3/9 But on April 18th, Dr. Buckley was notified that she had been disinvited, citing her board membership with "an organization that takes a public stance regarding trans people as dangerous and deceptive."
WoLF is proud to join other advocacy organizations to sign this letter demanding charges against Chrystul Kizer be dropped. We stand in solidarity with trafficked women and girls. womensliberationfront.org/news/wolf-sign…
Chrystul was only seventeen when she was trafficked by Randall P. Volar. Volar had already been under investigation for sex crimes against underage girls, and he raped Chrystul repeatedly.
Chrystul says she was resisting another rape attempt when she shot and killed Volar.
We believe Chrystul needs rehabilitation and support, not a lengthy prison term.
On December 6, 1989, Marc Lépine brought a gun to the École Polytechnique in Montreal. He went to a mechanical engineering class, separated the men from the women, and opened fire on the women. He said he was "fighting feminism."
Lepine shot all nine women in the room, killing six. He roamed for a further 20 minutes, targeting women. He killed eight more women before killing himself.
Today, we remember their names.
Geneviève Bergeron
Hélène Colgan
Nathalie Croteau
Barbara Daigneault
Anne-Marie Edward
Maud Haviernick
Barbara Klucznik-Widajewicz
Maryse Laganière
Maryse Leclair
Anne-Marie Lemay
Sonia Pelletier
Michèle Richard
Anne St-Arneault
Annie Turcotte
This year, California implemented sex self-identification for prison housing. Any man can seek transfer to women’s facilities if he says he is “transgender.” He does not have to identify as a woman(!) as long as he does not identify as a man. #KeepPrisonsSingleSex
The LA Times reported yesterday that 255 transfer requests to women’s facilities have been made in the first three months of this policy. Most are yet to be processed, but no transfer requests have yet been denied. latimes.com/california/sto…
New poll results reveal overwhelming bipartisan rejection of "gender identity" policies in West Virginia, such as those that would go into effect with the passage of the #EqualityAct. @Sen_JoeManchin@SenCapito
The results found wide, cross-partisan, agreement that men should not be allowed in women’s intimate spaces such as changing rooms or homeless shelters, even if they identify as women.
86 percent of WV voters agreed that male domestic abusers and sex offenders should not be allowed to serve their sentence in a women’s prison regardless of their claimed “gender identity,” including 78 percent of registered democrats.