WOOP! It’s BACK! On Tuesday 20th 3pm ET/8pm UK September join me with my guest @d_chernobrov to talk about his amazing new research ‘Diasporas as cyberwarriors: infopolitics, participatory warfare and the 2020 Karabakh war’ pls share/subscribe/watch:  🫖🍪
You can read @d_chernobrov paper ‘Diasporas as cyberwarriors: infopolitics, participatory warfare and the 2020 Karabakh war’ and ask questions! academic.oup.com/ia/article/98/…
And our joint paper ‘Competing propagandas: How the United States and Russia represent mutual propaganda activities’, which was recently most read open access paper in @JournalPolitics 😀journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02…
And please do also support my research and work bringing you such interesting guests for #AfternoonTeaAndTruthBiscuits 😀☕️🫖🍪 and exciting exclusives on #propaganda and #disinformation here patreon.com/emmalbriant thank you!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Emma L Briant

Dr. Emma L Briant Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmmaLBriant

Jun 9
I was told my private communications may have been hacked & released via a Russian state media journalist. He sent only a threatening message accusing me of ‘targeting’ people & promising to damage my career - no right of reply to an article in good faith. This isn’t journalism.
I am aware people are sharing an article from a Russian state-affiliated website and it is based on material that may have been criminally obtained - the material has not been authenticated and the attack is being investigated.
Some are suggesting hacking is fine? Those who use unethical tactics to obtain information have no principles and often falsify, lie & distort what they put out. These are classic tactics of influence operations & I would hope those who research propaganda would understand this.
Read 8 tweets
Jun 8
No Chloe it doesn’t mean that. Regularly in information warfare hacked information is misrepresented and doctored. I’ve even written about this before, many have. I’ve also already said I have not even heard of the events described. Image
Not only do I have no idea about what’s in this article. I’m going to comment the veracity of any articles on what is claimed to be my personal stolen data in any article by people regularly excusing and promoting a murderous dictator.
*Not going to
Read 4 tweets
May 31
Well done your complaint got my perspective removed from the reporting @jrschlosberg - a big win for free speech there. bbc.com/news/education… so if anyone wants to know my thoughts on all this they can review the threads of our conversation here
Read 6 tweets
May 23
BIG BREAKING NEWS! The DC Attorney General is suing Mark Zuckerberg over #CambridgeAnalytica - but you know, that was clearly a storm in a teacup… snake oil… hmmm?! (READ the suit here: documentcloud.org/documents/2203…) ⁦ washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
You can read about my role in revealing #CambridgeAnalytica’s wrongdoing & sign up for my newsletter on my website at Emma-Briant.co.uk & support my continued research exposing unethical influence industry practises and fight for accountability here patreon.com/emmalbriant
You can also attend a Q&A with me today here hosted by Cambridge Disinformation Summit @CambridgeCFRA - don’t miss it!!!
Read 14 tweets
May 17
I’m at an interesting event today about #AI and the US military at the national press club ImageImageImage
Currently listening to the Co-founder of #Deepmind talking about reliability and error and AI… now the discussion is moving to implementation of ethical principles with #AI and Dr Jane Pinelis from JAIC.
Fascinating discussion- someone is asking how DOD can “measure trust” - this is interpreted as measuring ‘reliance’ - how much they can rely on technology. They also consider how human behaviour interacts ie how military use the technology, user behaviour with it. Image
Read 24 tweets
May 17
Me watching people who research media systems talk about what ‘propaganda’ is.
People need to understand propaganda isn’t media bias. These are separate, different problems. There’s maybe a relationship between them, so structural issues with the media can let propaganda sneak through. But propaganda is a wholly different thing to study… if you understand
and research the media or social media or even advertising or even commercial PR or political economy of these things - you may have parts of the relevant knowledge but this isn’t the study of propaganda.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(