#SupremeCourt is hearing ED's challenge to the bail allowed to former IAS officer Anil Tuteja stating that the order is tainted.
ED has sought custodial interrogation of Tuteja and a stay of the anticipatory bail by the HC. The matter is in relation to a multi crores NAN Scam.
Court asks The ED why an Article 32 has been filed by a central agency.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta says the magnitude of the offences calls for it.
He informs court that there is enough evidence to suggest that the Money Laundering case is the predicate offence.
Solicitor General of India reads out a document to substantitae that not only were witnesses influenced by Prime accused, but the entire scam was carried out at behest of Chattisgarh Government.
Amid a heated exchange, SG of India says that the nation deserves to know about the scam which was carried out and at behest of who, he adds that the names which will be revealed “will shake the faith of people”
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal immediately interjects, says that if names are revealed, it may be at odds with some important names from the other spectrum of politics.
To this, SG of India Says that he has no objection if the sealed cover document is made public. He adds that he was deliberately withholding it, because it includes name of a Sitting Judge.
Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi says that Judges are not above the law, “So what?”, he says
SG Of India says that ED had filed a plea a year back and his case was not being listed. #CJI asks the opposing counsel if there was delay at least 10 times at their behest.
He says no,
SG says let the registry file the office report in that case.
#CJI: Notice was issued in this case in November 2021 and it prima facie appears that there was Substance in the plea by ED #SupremeCourt
#CJI: It appears that almost 10 months have gone by since the matter came up & that bench has to look at whether there is any substance in this case at all & “sealed cover documents” should be filed by both parties.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan says that the investigating in this scam must be conducted by independent agency but it should be conducted with court monitoring.
Solicitor General of India says that he has “absolutely no objection to that”
BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear the plea by Enforcement Directorate on Monday, challenging the bail allowed to former IAS officer Anil Tuteja, stating that the order is tainted after notice was issued in November 2021
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#DelhiHighCourt hearing a plea by Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the CCPA imposing fine of Rs. 1lac for selling pressure cookers without Bureau of India Standard (BIS) mark.
Counsel for Amazon argues that the order is completely based on conjuncture.
Quoting from the order of CCPA, counsel states that "who has determined this?"
Court- You don't have the BIS mark?
Counsel- I don't know! We don't know! Nobody knows! Nobody has done an investigation. They are only presuming. This is.
#DelhiHighCourt hearing a PIL plea alleging that the Delhi Police officials are getting allowance for cycle which they are not using.
Petitioner appearing through VC from his Car, Sanser Pal Singh submits that they are getting allowance for a vehicle which they do not have.
CJ Satish Chandra Sharma: Aap toh Car me ghoom rahe hai na, uncle cycle k allowance k liye apko dikkat ho rahi hai (You are roaming around in a Car and have problem with their cycle allowance).
The Court has asked the Counsel appearing for the Delhi Police to seek instruction on adding cycle/ bike for the allowance as most are using bikes now.
#DelhiHighCourt hearing a plea alleging that a project is raising serious concerns to the national security. Matter pertains to the non-completion of a project of laying down optical fiber line for the Army, Ministry of Defence.
Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that around 10 years have been passed and the project is is still pending. The tender was issued in 2013.
CJ Satish Chandra Sharma: Where is BSNL? because the project is not completed, the tender was issued in 2013, no action has been taken against the contractor.
LIVE UPDATES #SupremeCourt to continue hearing on Hijab
Counsel Dave: ( says as Religion is defined in Shirur mutt, to be made applicable everywhere)
Justice Gupta: I don’t think that is the law. Definition is given in the context. You can’t take it out of the context.
Counsel Dave: (referring to a judgment where Chief Justice Sinha was in minority and Justice Dasgupta in majority) Essential religious practice to be derived at in accordance to the doctrines of that religion. [Highlights] *Obnoxious social rule or practice* to be avoided.
#DelhiHighCourt in a plea by Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the CCPA imposing fine of Rs. 1lac for selling pressure cookers with Bureau of India Standard (BIS) mark.
Counsel- We are an intermediary! I only want to indicate that there is a scheme of investigation that is to be followed u/S.20.
Counsel further argues that how have they come to the conclusion that the pressure cooker has not been listed.
🚨Will the Hijab be allowed in Pre-University institutions?
Supreme Court will hear the plea(s) challenging the Order of Karnataka HC upholding the prohibition on wearing of headscarves in Pre-University institutions #SupremeCourt#hijab
On the last date, Arguments in the Top Court centred around the lack of competence by Courts to interpret religious scriptures.
Senior advocate Colin Gonsalves contended that the Karnataka HC judgment under challenge was “majoritarian” #HIJAB lawbeat.in/top-stories/hi…
Supreme Court begins to hear the matter:
Counsel Dave: I had to put my thoughts in writing which I will submit in the end, which will perhaps end your lordships.