Roger: discussion change in handwriting and the significance of "scriptum" (?) in contextualizing the Chaumpaigne quitclaim record #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
[I deleted the previous tweet which erroneously included a screenshot; my apologies]
Roger: Chaucer & Chaumpaigne as co-defendants in a writ in a matter regarding the Statue of Laborers (involving Staunton) #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Roger: discussion of Brevia files (not accessible to early Chaucer biographers): ID original write under statute/ordinance of laborers brought by Thomas Stuandon vs. Geoffrey Chaucer & Cecily Chaumpaigne #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Roger: working with idea that Chaumpaigne had moved from Staundon's service into Chaucer's service; was she abducted? poached? #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Roger: pursuing the reading of the quitclaim by Staundon as being jointly against Chaucer & Chaumpaigne as co-defendants, removing means for Staundon to pursue the issue #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Roger: pursuing the question of how trespass and the language of abduction underlies the legal documents re: labor issues/disputes #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Roger: tracing legal issues as navigated via Chaumpaigne's attorneys and the release of charges of "raptus" within the formal legal context of Staundon's charges #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Roger: reconsidering established interpretations and chronologies; major insight is Chaucer & Chaumpaigne as co-defendants in a labor disputed involving Staundon; possibility for more life-records to come to light #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Sobecki: Chaucer life-records causing/reminding us to read texts/archives with suspicion; importance of feminist work to reassess Chaucer/contemporaries "against the grain" of gender hierarchies and power structures #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Sobecki: this new info re: Chaumpaigne quitclaim will NOT "undo" the contributions of feminist scholarship and no amount of "new" life-records will change the historical/present reality of rape culture & sexual violence #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Prescott: discussing history/experience in researching King's Bench records, many of which were unexamined (just laying in sacks!) until 1960s #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Prescott: importance of King's Bench files as under-appreciated archive on many fronts (Peasants' Revolt/Rising, labor, and more); needs further conservation #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Cannon: discussion literary implications of these new revelations re: the Chuampaigne quitclaim contexts and what "raptus" could mean & where info could be found; the paper itself at NCS didn't generate much interest and skepticism & gasps #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Cannon: meaning of "raptus" still remains mysterious in 14c English law, even in the copy of the release; even in light of these documents "raptus" opens up questions #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Baechle: These new documents shift us from individual survivor discourse (can invite spectacle & victim-blaming) to a structurally oriented approach to medieval consent/rape; using Chaucer's Philomena story, attending scripts of rape culture #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Baechle: Chaucer managing narrative-literary rhetoric in conjunction with legal formulae constructing ideas of rape as a "deviant" event & who is considered more vulnerable to rape (including class) and which kinds of rape deserve attention #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Baechle: structural forces of rape culture (medieval and present-day) to engage in implicit or overt victim-blaming and putting the impetus on the (potential) target to prevent sexual violence; myths about rape/consent pervade medieval culture #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Harris: didn't think the "answer" regarding Chaumpaigne & "raptus" was findable; now need to explore status of consent & servant women at the intersections of labor, class, and sexuality in medieval England & enduring realities of rape culture #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Harris: unpacks the term "enduren" on how Chaucerians can respond to this new discovery; it's still a case about Chaucer and another man via female service; think about "wenches" and maids in medieval culture; will, labor, subordination #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Harris: Chaumpaign's status as a woman subject to two men, including Chaucer, gives new attention to the maid in the Wife of Bath's prologue; female (domestic?) servants pervade the Canterbury Tales; what tasks, what scripts of consent/labor? #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Harris: we need to attend to how servant-women endured rape culture in medieval England; intersecting disadvantages of their labor conditions & gender make them uniquely vulnerable to violation; this info does not "relieve" us from discomfort #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Seal: opens with co-edited issue of ChR & understandings of Chaucer as a rapist, racist & antisemite; feminist scholars grapple with "cancel culture" accusations; historical Chaucer wasn't in legal jeopardy re: "raptus" but Father Chaucer is #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Seal: insightful & scathing reading of male Chaucer biographers who winkingly or jokingly refer to Chaumpaigne as a "wench" (!) or similar insinuations with apologist language re: "seduction" etc. that rely upon classic rape culture paradigms #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Seal: constructions of historical Chaumpaigne profoundly shaped by rape culture cannot be "undone," & Chaucerian women in 20c have been reminded of their contingent belonging in the field; "Father Chaucer" is not exonerated & we are complicit #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
I feel I have new readings of the many domestic working women in WBP after Harris's talk (& her previous talks re: medieval "wench"); intersecting forces of gender, labor, class, consent, and more -- want to bring this into future classes #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion of the discourse of the "ward" and rhetorics/frameworks of agency in how these Chaumpaigne legal documents are interpreted; how did laborers interact with court systems? #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion: consistent references to Chaumpaigne as a "baker's daughter" but her father owned property & was a high-end grain dealer; bio of Chaumpaigne in the works #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion: interesting context re: urban merchant-class legal disputes re: labor, which could involve both the male householder and female laborer (e.g., Chaucer and Chaumpaigne as co-defendants) #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
(I'm wondering how one re-reads Chaumpaigne in context of Cook's Tale: gender, labor, household relations, domestic order, etc.) #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion of "raptus" in other areas of medieval records (e.g., any involving men?): there are actually many more records out there, says Prescott in context of 1381 rebels #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion: Chaucer & Chaumpaigne together jointly using a strategy in order to show he didn't take her against her will, as this matters re: the statue of laborers litigation #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion: how do revelations change how we teach Chaucer? Harris: students read ChR issue, respond re: servant women in text(s); Baechle: doesn't change much re: "Father Chaucer" but bio needs nuance; Seal: texts are not "single issue" texts #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Seal: we don't "just" talk about Jews and antisemitism in the Prioress's Tale, just as we don't only talk about rape re: WBT/MillT; these are broader structural issues we address re: the signifier/idea of "Father Chaucer" writ large #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Harris: this new gendered labor context of "raptus" still leaves the sexual "availability" framework in place re: medieval female domestic laborers who had little recourse for their harms & vulnerabilities #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Baechle: important reminder that this particular context re: this Chuampaigne "raptus" matter is not the full story, and all of this never exonerates his participation and complicity in medieval (and modern) rape culture #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Seal: we've tended to forget about Phillippa, the historical Chaucer's own wife; how do we think about other women in Chaucer's life & life-records and these networks of gender, power, control #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion: coercion is NOT ruled out even in this understanding of this Chaumpaigne legal matter; these are high-status men and Chaumpaigne is at the center; procurement is a "gray area" (says Roger) #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
Discussion re: digitizing and making records more accessible online; importance of collaboration across archival, legal, literary fields; needs funding & labor to make this kind of thing happen #ChaucerLifeRecords#MedievalTwitter
As someone who researches #disability & life writing (past & present), I find the proliferating/emergent/shifting first-person academic genre of "my reflections on writing in/through the pandemic" so fascinating. #PandemicLife#amwriting
Some of the academics publishing these things come are trained in Disability Studies, which informs their approach. But some are not & don't ever name "disability" as such; disability is everywhere & nowhere. Don't know what to make of any of it yet #PandemicLife#amwriting
I'm trying to get my head around concurrent scales/trajectories/waves of time. One interesting thing about this Hellsite is seeing how convos can adapt & transform "in real time" & you can also track slower extended convos shifting as conditions change. #PandemicLife#amwriting
Hey tweeps I thought I'd share with you this weird, vivid, non-allegorical academic anxiety dream I had last night #AcademicTwitter 🧵
I had this dream that we were back to in-person teaching but the University had randomly decided the faculty would be grouped into mandatory 5-person teaching pods.
Each pod was an interdisciplinary team that would teach some Big Idea course (e.g., Mind, World, Life, etc.)
So I was assigned to a pod with 4 other faculty from totally random disparate departments/programs. None of us had ever met before.
1/ I’m glad that the #NotAMonk convos are pointing out problems with the NYT article's opening quote (Richard Utz, prominent white male medievalist, “speaking for” the field as if it were “apolitical” and as if monks were apolitical — in the past or present).
2/ But such convos are still uneven in naming the harms of such framing: this kind of statement is part of a continued pattern of sidelining marginalized medievalists (esp. BIPOC) and casting such ppl/allies as “inappropriately” political or “imposing” on an innocent field.