The top court had last month orally suggested that the Kerala government should work towards finding a middle ground to tackle the stray dog menace and balance the same with animal rights.
SC: We can lay down general guidelines but not look into individual cases about which complex should adopt culling, or location specific problems. You are right in saying kids should not be afraid to go out and play. But if we hear cases from all over...
Sr Adv CU Singh: If my lords see the videos of dog keepers/carers being pulled out of cars ... Please let them also share what they are showing this Court.
Justice Khanna: Just a minute. If required we will see.
Judges looking at some videos/content on their computer.
Sr Adv Anand Grover (to court staff): Can we, hum log video email kar sakte hain?
Justice Khanna: We saw one or two instances where dogs did chase, girl had to flee in the video we saw. We are not saying you do not have a grievance, but only on whether we should be hearing individual cases.
Adv: Dogs are still ferocious.
SC: If the animal welfare board...
SC: is not taking care, you can move the High Court.
Bench says even a contempt petition in matter not being heard because of its view on which forum should hear it.
SC: We cannot deal with specific cases, it'll be impossible for us. We can lay general guidelines
Order: In our opinion, order dated 14.11.2015 of this Court requires a clarification. We do not think it is the intent of this Court in the said order that all writ petitions or proceedings before HCs, civil courts and authorities should come to a standstill and no effective...
Order: orders can be passed by HCs in cases pertaining to stray dogs. It would seem there would be individual grievances relating to applicability and enforcement of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the ...
Order: Accordingly, to remove any doubt, we clarify that the 2015 order does not bar or prohibit the authorities or individuals including registered societies from approaching the HCs or jurisdictional courts.
Order: We specifically clarify that the Bombay HC can hear the Writ Petition 9513 of so and so on accordance with law.
Similarly, it stated that a Contempt Petition is pending before the HC which may be considered in accordance with law. We have not expressed any opinion...
Justice Khanna: We will deal with the main matter here about the conflict between the rules and PCA.
Chitambaresh: But they cannot go beyond the rules vs Act challenge.
SC: Let them continue the hearing, incase there is a conflict you can approach us. We give directions to enforce the law, but they are not cast in stone unlike statutes. We modify where needed.
Order: The suo motu plea in Kerala High Court to continue in accordance with law.
Order: Pendency of the SLP before this Court will not affect the proceedings, whole precedent is to be followed.
Sr Adv Anand Grover: They should not get into the conflict between rules.
Grover: Kerala HC was in our favour. Bombay HC was not.
SC: We have said follow precedent. Issue is vacation of stays, modification of interim orders in PILs. Now tell us, are all the animal welfare boards ... ? Who is appearing? Do you have the data, we want the data.
Grover: A matter from the Delhi High Court had come before the CJI bench. If the general issue is decided as quickly as possible, then a large problem is solved. Most of the municipal orders will not withstand the scrutiny of Article 21.
Order: AWBI will file Affidavit ...
Order: with respect to dog bites in States and cities and indicate the steps taken by them. List in February. They should also indicate whether they want certain guidelines. Liberty may be filed with regard to Enforcement of the provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty ...
Advocate: Lordships may say no cruelty in the interim.
SC: We will examine it when it comes up. Any one can file objections to the Srijaran Committee Report. Parties at liberty to file response and compilations in this regard.
Bombay High Court is hearing the plea filed by Rutuja Latke seeking directions to BMC to accept her resignation so that she can contest Maharashtra byelections.
Sr Adv Vishwajeet Sawant for Latke stated that BMC had an idea that Latke wanted to resign on Sept 2, 2022. On Sept 29, she was informed that she cannot resign. On October 3, the Election Commission of India declared elections. Same day she formally resigned.
Sawant: Last date for filing nomination is October 14.
Just because of my contesting elections some political view is taken of it.
If there is voluntary resignation, there is nothing pending against me, you have accepted but not given formal acceptance of the same.
Bench was hearing a matter where marriage was sought to be quashed using Article 142 powers as husband pointed out earlier efforts at reconciliation have failed.
Justice Kaul: Why force 2 young people who have their life ahead of them to ...
Justice Kaul: We don't have the Western system here where you file divorce one day and get it approved the next. Here i feel that both parties need to give it a try, we can't import western philosophy.
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Two days prior to last hearing they filed letter rogatory. The judge has not ordered them to go, only then they can go to the mission.
SC: It was (ordered).
Rohatgi: must have been recently. But these things take time. My lord it started
Bench discusses
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appears: As indicated by Your Lordships indicated, the questions of law might be academic. There might be some individuals issues. My suggestion is that they can be taken care of on admin side.
#SupremeCourt hearing plea challenging the practice of Talaq-e-Hasan by which a Muslim man can divorce his wife by saying the word "talaq" once a month, for three months.
Order: Ld Counsel for the private Respondent has entered appearance and stated that he is not agreeable to settlement even on issue of further alimony. List on 3rd week of February for final hearing.
Counters within 4 weeks, rejoinders 2 weeks thereafter.