Good content design is grounded in knowing what the user wants, and how they want it.
(I know the general rule is stuff like "write for an 8th grader" or "16yo" etc. - but that doesn't work when your audience is literally brain surgeons!)
The audiences language and knowledge "levels"
defines things like whether you can include:
* abbreviations
* topic/industry terms/jargon
* sentence length
* sentences per paragraph
* distance between references
* overall length of content
etc.
After that, it's looking at what's in the content,
and when/where key parts occur.
Semantic Structure is first - Headings and paragraphs, lists, tables etc.
1 H1, then maybe some H2s, in more detailed pieces you may want H3's (under the relevant H2!).
It's rare to need H4/H5/H6.
All Headings should be clear, concise and convey information - and relation to other headings.
There should be clear visual distinction between the different types (that's what CSS is for people - you don't use H3 because it's smaller),
and from body copy.
Then we have the main copy ... and the use of bold/strong, possible italics too.
(Underlines online can be confusing due to links)
Font changes should ideally be avoided
(different typeface for headings and body is fine, and even things like pull-quotes/ed-notes etc.)
Avoid over-usage ... and heavy mixing (don't have bold, normal, bold, bold, normal etc.).
And pay attention to font-sizing.
Try not to vary "body copy" to much/often,
and keep heading sizes consistent (all H2s = same size please!).
Mind colours and contrast too!
Along with semantic markup, you should be looking at styling and visual design.
White space is important!
Gaps between sections make it visually clearer there's a break in the flow/topic.
Different sized gaps (such as between 2 paragraphs vs a paragraph and H2) can help too.
Then there's the "rules" around "breaking up text".
People tend to forget to mention that it's entirely dependent on the type of content, it's purpose and the audience.
Do you really want to pop in an image every 3 paragraphs in a biographic piece, or a kiddy piece?
And it's not just images.
You can "break the text" with visual rules (<hr/>),
or a list, a table, a chart etc.
Then we have the content of the copy/content.
There are established best practices here,
and they generally work.
Lede's are meant to contain enough value that a user can orientate themselves and identify value, fast!
Combined with Title/Inbound link text and main heading ...
... a user should be pretty darn confident of what they are about to consume, and that it will answer their need.
(Typically 15 seconds should permit most folk to identify suitability or not)
The inverted pyramid is well established
Provide the user with the scene/setting/conditions and the characters/topic/event and the time/place
(who, what, when, where, why, how) etc.
These should be presented early (per section).
Then lead them through to more info (see why it's called a "lede"? :D)
Key details can be embolded/increased in weight
(just not to many/often).
Depending on the nature of the content/audience,
you can look at each key point being it's own sentence or even paragraph.
But remember, there are design elements,
you can start
new lines
etc.
(I don't suggest abusing such things - but it can be used to help users scan/locate
key information by breaking it so it appears earlier :D)
HTML and CSS permit us to influence factors such as line-length, word-breaking/wrap etc.,
so have a look/play, see what works better.
And as we're looking at it ... letter spacing, word spacing and line spacing.
It's worth increasing these fractionally, as it tends to make things easier to read for everyone.
(As does picking clear, open font-types, with strong differences between similar characters!)
Line-length is problematic due to varying displays/devices,
but we can utilise maximums (typical suggestions range from 50-70 characters).
Fixed sizes on containing elements, max-characters on <p> and <h2> etc. can help
(you may want to look at non-breaking spaces etc.)
Placement is another one often missed.
In many cases, a "page" will consist of multiple parts (nav, content, sidebar, footer etc.)
These are fairly standardised, and principles still typically apply - spacing/slight variations in sizing of text can help users identify importance
Providing content that is:
* easily consumable,
* comprehensible,
* scannable (push key items to the top/start of each section),
* clear/uncluttered
can go a long way to increasing retention time, consumption %, return rates, leads and conversions.
Invest a little in to it!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.
:: *sigh* - someone found the cookie-cutters! ::
*checks calendar*
@NicheSiteLady & @NicheDown
It's called "cookie-cutter content";
when you basically copy a piece of content, change a tiny % of it, to rank for n+ terms.
Now, I know it says "affiliate",
but it applies for just about any type of site,
be it's monetisation via
* direct sales
* ad-rev
* affiliate payments
* referral fees
(The term MFA used to be applied (made for ads (affiliates))
So, the problem is - though it can (does!) work,
(bad Google, bad!),
it's possible that G will catch it at some point,
and may hammer a site for it
(so please - at least give people a warning!).
There are ways to handle it "better",
with reduced risk.
1/?
:: Crawling Large, Huge and Mega sites ::
:: Partial vs Full crawls ::
@JetOctopus has done a piece looking at some of the issues that can arise from not doing a Full Crawl,
or, as I'd phrase it, doing a really shoddy Partial Crawl.
Getting the idea of ToF/MoF (or early journey) content being equal to BoF/Conversion.
Due to some SEOs and the way G says things,
there's this stupid misunderstanding about ranking pages (not sites),
and not getting how X supports/improves Z.
2/?
From a marketing/consumer perspective,
that content enables early awareness/recognition of the company,
and starts building trust, rapport and emotion/loyalty.
From an SEO perspective, it increases topicality and Link value flow (internal links have been important for years)
3/?
There's also the wonderful confusion (read as *fucking annoying) regarding the "funnel".
For some reason - people seem to think there's only one.
In most cases - there's 2 "broad" funnels (marketing and sales).
And the "marketing funnel" is often several funnels!
.
:: Regular performance audits are good ::
:: Alerts on Priority content is better! ::
You should have a separate segment,
tracking priority pages: 1) Those that do contribute heavily to Goals 2) Those that ideally would contribute to Goals
And those are the bare-basics!
There's also optional things...
>>>
3/5 >>>
Optional elements would include things like:
* Read time (est. based on word count)
* Social action/share links
* Pull quotes (and share-excerpt links for social)
* Comments/Reviews (and indication of such at top)
* Sub-Images (non-hero, set as lazy etc.)
etc.
Logic says G not only have a method (at least one),
but use it too!
And I've asked (at least 4 times) for an indication of what the threshold is,
and whether it's based solely on "content",
or if it includes code etc.,
and been ignored/evaded - every single time :(
I don't think there is a "specific" threshold,
I believe it is variable - based on availability.
G can/does show duplicates and highly similar results in a SERP,
esp. if there is little else for them to show.
The more "options" to show (that aren't dupes),
the fewer G shows.