As I've done this 18 months or so of book talks for Of Thee I Sing (many traced below, w/links to videos for a lot of them!), I've focused more & more on one of my book's four categories of contested American patriotisms: mythic patriotism. Quick thread:
So mythic patriotism is still a celebration of America (a la my 1st category, celebratory patriotism), but it's one that's exclusionary in two key & interconnected ways. 1) It celebrates a particular vision of US history, identity, etc., one I'd call overtly white-centered.
& 2) It defines anyone who disagrees with, critiques, challenges that particular vision of the US as not only outside that vision or narrative, but also & especially as outside of both patriotism (unpatriotic, treasonous) & the US (un/anti-American).
We saw that in last night's #WISen debate between @RonJohnsonWI & @TheOtherMandela. When asked to say something positive about Barnes, Johnson noted he has "loving parents" but added "What puzzles me is why did he turn against America?”
That's the vision of anyone who challenges the kinds of white-centered narratives of the US that Johnson espouses as un/anti-American. But as I've taught my current adult ed class on how white supremacy undermines the US ideals it claims to love, I'd add one more layer to this:
There are no American ideals more central than those of democracy, representative gov, voting & elections. Johnson & WI GOP have consistently attacked & undermined those ideals for years. & Johnson did so directly on #January6th, taking part in the alternate electors nonsense.
If anyone the #WISenateDebate can be said to have "turned against America," it's Johnson. That he attacks Barnes for doing so embodies this 3rd layer of mythic patriotism: a patriotism that celebrates white America, attacks those who don't, & undermines our ideals in every way.
For more, check out my book--which I'd love to chat about w/any & all communities, including students/classes for sure! rowman.com/ISBN/978153814…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here it is, my 97th #ScholarSunday thread of great public scholarly writing & work, podcast episodes & conversations, new & forthcoming books from the last week. Add more below & enjoy, all! #twitterstorians
Happy 60th to #DrNo & the James Bond film franchise! We all have those pop culture things for which we mostly turn off our brain, & for me the Bond films are definitely atop that list. I'm able to analyze & criticize them for sure, but I also get great pleasure from the series.
But I also greatly value those folks & works helping contextualize & analyze the films & character, including @DrLisaFunnell, YouTube channels like @calvindyson's, books like James Chapman's License to Thrill, & much more. google.com/books/edition/…
I've blogged about Bond twice so far, both in relationship to AmericanStudies topics:
This one on the most thoroughly (& at times frustratingly) American & Western Hemispheric film, Live & Let Die:
Taught my favorite poet, Sarah Piatt, last week in online Am Lit II & this week in Honors Lit Seminar on the Gilded Age, & have been thinking a lot in the process about two layers to why we should all read & talk about poetry. (Cf. this @AWMuseum post.) americanwritersmuseum.org/why-we-should-…
First & foremost, like all our greatest poets, Piatt uses the form & genre to open up familiar questions & themes in profoundly new & illuminating ways. Take "A Pique at Parting," for example, which we're talking about this week in Honors Lit:
Courtship & relationship dynamics in the late 19C, women's perspectives on their own identities & possibilities/limits as well as on men & the world, domesticity & work, religion--it's all there, & so much more, in a stanza & rhyme structure that moves us through Piatt's ideas.
One of the central ideas underlying my new project is the question of historical inevitability, & more exactly challenging our understandable sense that things had to play out how they did. Every moment was contingent, & changeable based on individual & collective actions alike.
Some of the most influential such actors in American history specifically, of course, have been our presidents. & those influences have often been, well, pretty bad. So this week, in honor of Rutherford B. Hayes' 200th birthday, I'm blogging about a handful of Bad Presidents.
Starting today with James Buchanan, & how his badness helps us challenge the idea that the #CivilWar was inevitable by the 1850s. #twitterstorians
Here it is, my 93rd #ScholarSunday thread of great public scholarly writing & work, podcast eps & convos, new & forthcoming books from the last week. Share more below & enjoy, all! #twitterstorians