Share this page!

LawBeat Profile picture
Twitter logo
Oct 17 • 4 tweets • 3 min read
Just In: Allahabad HC adjourns hearing in Mosque committee's revision plea against Varanasi Court order rejecting its application against the maintainability of the suit filed by 5 Hindu women seeking permission to worship Hindu deities residing inside #Gyanvapi.
#allahabadhc Image
Today, Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee informed the court that it is required to file some additional documents. The Hindu side's counsel objected to the same.
#gyanvapi #allahabadhc
The bench of Justice JJ Munir, however, asked the Varanasi Court to provide certified copies of the case records.
He made an oral observation that the scope of a petition filed under Order 7 Rule 11 is very narrow.
The matter will be next taken up on October 19.
#allahabadhc
Gyanvapi Case| In Mosque Committee's Revision Plea Allahabad HC Asks Varanasi District Judge To Provide Photocopies Of Case Records
@ISalilTiwari reports
lawbeat.in/amp/news-updat…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 19
Just In: An application has been filed in the #SupremeCourt against #DelhiGovernment seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against them owing to the #Ban on online sale of the #firecrackers allegedly imposed by them.
@dr_a_p_singhLaw
Adv AP Singh while speeking with @LawBeatInd said, not only online sale, general sale & use of #firecracker has also been banned.

Application stated, CM @ArvindKejriwal, without passing any official resolution announced a ban on the sale and distribution of firecrackers in Delhi
It submits that the prohibition imposed on the purchase and sale of #firecrackers and not licensing firecracker shops in Delhi is not only an attack on our "Religious Tradition of bursting crackers on #Deepawali but also in violation of the Explosives Rules 2008."
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 19
#SupremeCourt in an SLP challenging common judgment and order of conviction of Madras HC for the offences u/s 341, 323, 376 of IPC and u/s 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, states:
‘Oral testimony by victim, supported by husband and mother in law needs no further corroboration’
Court noted that the testimonies stood the test of cross-examination and were very consistent versions.
The appellant had challenged the conviction on the grounds:
-that all the accused were not named in FIR
-only description of height was given
-that there were no injuries on the victim
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 19
The matter is taken up by the court
Bench : Are you appearing in person?

#bombayhighcourt
Bench - You have to get permission from the registrar for appearing in person
Read 6 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 19
PIL states that during the lockdown and Corona period, when the entire print media in India was facing heavy losses, the company ‘Prabodhan Prakashan Pvt. Ltd.’, owned by Thackeray family, showed Turnover of 42 Crores and profit of Rs.11.5 Crores.
The petitioner has stated that "It seems it’s a clear case of turning the black money into white one."
The petition alleges that the PIL is filed for the purpose of exposing the huge money laundering and indiscriminate corruption played by the persons holding very high places as public servants.
Read 5 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 19
#SupremeCourt hearing a plea challenging Death Sentence of a man accused of rape and murder of a 4 year old girl.
Modification of order is sought for in the plea. Image
Court notes:
-Offence was committed in April 2013 -in February 2013 there was an amendment to IPC.
-POCSO comes in effect only in 2019.
-Section 376 IPC requires ‘till last breath’
Counsel requests Imprisonment to life. Conviction under I and M was affirmed by the Court earlier.
Read 9 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
Oct 19
#Delhi's Special CBI Court, Rouse Avenue will today continue hearing @AamAadmiParty Minister #SatyendraJain bail plea in #moneylaunderingcase.
Yesterday, Adv. Sushil Gupta for Ankush Jain &Vaibhav Jain began making his arguments before Spl. Judge Vikas Dhull.
#PMLA #Bail #plea
During the Hearing, Yesterday, SPP N. K. Matta, filed an additional affidavit on behalf of #ED showing conduct of the three accused namely, #Satyendra Jain, Ankush Jain, and Vaibhav Jain the Jail.
SPP Matta alleged that 3 accused are hampering investigation &that Ankush and Vaibhav are helping Jain. He also contended that Jain is controlling everything from inside.

Read more:
lawbeat.in/news-updates/p…
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

Email the whole thread instead of just a link!

Separate emails with commas

:(