Thread by @LawBeatInd

#SupremeCourt litigant requests the Court to allow him to to argue his matter himself.
Case: Litigant is a #HIVpositive patient, because of a Given blood transfusion (as alleged) in a military hospital, which was contaminated with #HIV

The litigant yesterday appeared before the Court request an urgent hearing his matter. The Court listed the matter for today.
Hospital Had given a negative report of 2014, is alleged.

Litigant says HIV negative report can not be taken on record, as the concern is required in writing.

Court asks if he could place the name of the donor on record.
Respondents: 2002 blood transfusion records is not kept for this long.

The grievance of the litigant is that he is not being given proper treatment by the Military Hospital.

Counsel for the respondents says a court of enquiry has been initiated in the matter, and they will take care of the treatment of the litigant.

Court: He being an ex-service man is entitled to all the benefits.
Let the Petitioner take care of the factual aspect, you take care of the Legal (SA Meenakshi Arora).

While the Court was about rise, ASG Vikramjit Banerjee reached the Court, to present his matter ( while still in the process of catching his breath)
Court decided to hear the matter.

Out without going into issues, as ASG Banerjee fairly accepted that whatever is required shall be done every single faculty will be provided.
Directs to litigant to report to the Base Hospital, New Delhi.
Shall be examined by doctors and prepare a status report.

Considers Dr Lal Path labs positive report
Court asks for a treatment that could reverse HIV.
ASG Banerjee: I am not aware, Milords, I am not a Doctor.
Court Lists the matter for disposal before the appropriate Court for Nov 22.

*Correction* every single facility will be provided