NEXT Speaker : VA ecmo for which patients?
Alain COMBES
Severe cardiogenic shock has different phenotypes 1. medical cardiogenic shock(AMI, end stage dilated CM, myocarditis, septic shock) 2. Post cardiotomy refractory CS (post CABG) #LIVES2022 @ESICM#ecmo#resuscitation#ALS
@ESICM 2022 what do the guidelines say
- ESC recommends short term MCS should be considred in cardiogenic shock.
IABP may be considered but not routinely recommended in post MI #LIVES2022
What about in fulminant!myocarditis ? Mostly giant cell myocarditis #LIVES2022
What about in cardiomyopathy patients?
- ECMO can be used as a bridge to heart transplant
- the other strategy is "bridge to bridge"
- 2 ecmo device for each L and R heart WOAHHHH!!
2 ecmo for 1 pt
ECMO has completely changed the way we manage heart transplant
- 20 years ago we dont have VA ECMO and not this rapidly
- e.g., RV failure post heart transplant.
- see below where ECMO pre Heart tx has almost as good outcome
Next : what about in life-threatening PE?
this is a difficult area.
timing is very important
- as part of resuscitation OR to stabilise severe haemodynamics OR in case of failed sys thrombolytics or catheter directed therapies.
Again Ecmo chat needs to reference @SCAI criteria of CS. #LIVES2022
But class E may not be the right patient group. Multi organ failure is major risk factors for not surviving Ecmo. We need to find right patient group perhaps in scai C D groups. #LIVES2022#ecmo#ECMO
A few more trials coming and more results likely to come out soon over next few months and years.
Another trial in France ongoing with a different primary end point.
Q: what about using ECMO earlier not as a final rescue device but more commonly?
A: clearly we have to move on to earlier in disease process but we do need to work on early identification of this patient groups for both ecmo and impella #ecmo#LIVES2022 #ECMO
Q: drug toxicity cardiogenic shock?
A: again if started early could have good outcomes. WE SHOULD NOT hesitate to start ECMO in 2022 -- this is so 2010. :P #ECMO#als#MCS#LIVES2022
Mariangela PELLEGRINI
Uppsala- Sweden
"Do we Need a biological definition of ARDS"
- Berlin definition has NO Diffuse alveolar damage .
- the Berlin defn does not capture well
Frohlich - different definitions specificity of 0.63, 0.42, 0.31 even! #ventilation#ards#LIVES2022
ARDS - new definition or phenotypes by @GicoBellani refreshing with Kigali definition of ARDS - useful not just low resource but during pandemic in supposedly high income settings and only draw back is no PEEp requirement #ards#ventilation#LIVES2022@ESICM
@GicoBellani@ESICM Resolved versus confirmed ARDS
- prospectively applying Berlin definition did work but if ya wait 24 hrs and re-measure P/F ratio, you end up stratifying much better.
- Better separation of groups
@ESICM PARAMEDIC 2 - big study
8007 pts, adrenaline 4000, placebo 3999
- a lot of discussion post trial
- need a nuanced interpretation.
- 19 "more good" survivors and 5 "more bad" survivors in adrenaline arm.