Malthus John Profile picture
Oct 29 11 tweets 12 min read
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning In the context I gave, the answers to the 2 questions play a critical role: they define the market. Prof. White added another: #anonymous #bearer_instruments.

Forgery, issuing, loaning, & taxing have been concerns from the earliest days of State control. Laws have to adapt >

/1
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning - to technology changes, which can radically alter the landscape of the #system.

Long before the specific formal appearance in the Literature¹ʻ², conflicts between open & closed markets were apparent & dealt with. The dilemma didn't go away, they relied on the difficulty >

/2
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning - of producing & transporting the object of redemption: gold. This clearing was done in separate, closed markets between banks &/or #nationstates.

Removing that standard shifted the dilemma for them, but we're concerned w/the citizen markets of nations. Suffice it to say, >

/3
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning - #banknotes as bearer instruments were no longer redeemable for anything other than goods & services in regulated mkts, subject to consumer protection laws, etc.

The other hole in the supposedly closed system was addressed in 1982³. Note that I've purposefully highlighted >

/4
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning several other elements here to underscore that this is a #complex problem, & cannot be answered by a single linear stance such as "but it's not expressly forbidden".

We're seeing a related ongoing debate regarding regulation of #McCrypto (Wall St version), & the conclusion >

/5
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning - will be the same. In these head-on battles, the nationstate as we know it will win, or #collapse.

Bearer instruments categorically share components that require similar #regulation, so the same reasoning applies to all.

In the tight margin of issue/redeem liquidity, >

/6
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning - failures stem from tiny changes in conditions (far from #equilibrium state), so the (US) eliminating tax deductions as well as imposing 1% excise tax on bearer obligations³ʻ⁴ killed the practice of issuing them as a viable business model. Other countries have direct bans.
>
/7
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning If it wasn't apparent before, the final nails in this coffin came in 2001⁵.

So while there is no 'outright ban' on things like private banknotes, #bitcoin, or "token stocks", neither is one needed, as every necessary component of them has been corralled into #compliance.

>
/8
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning Notes:
¹ Gold & Central Banks, Młynarski, 1929
² Gold & the Dollar Crisis, Triffin, 1960
³ Tax Equity & Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982
⁴ FDIC Trust Examination Manual, Sec 11
⁵ Patriot Act, Title III (amended Money Laundering Control Act of 1986, Bank Secrecy Act of 1970)
@GeorgeSelgin @lawrencehwhite1 @jp_koning Standard disclaimer:

I'm observing & parsing here, not trying to make normative claims.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Malthus John

Malthus John Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MalthusJohn

Aug 31, 2020
@MarcGoldich Points of clarity to discuss:

It's not lawyers who use handcuffs.

This sword cuts both ways: the same ambiguity that emboldens innovators to imagine themselves a step ahead of law won't convince enforcement & courts that existing laws don't apply.

1⃣/4
@MarcGoldich 2⃣/4

Reality is nonlinear. Changes to law come from society itself, not merely lawyers & regulators.

'Innovators' are not all 1 type. There will be crypto visionaries, MS competitors, copycat scams & victims all vying to frame new laws here.

Does a cat catch-up to its tail?
@MarcGoldich 3⃣/4

In general, the number of people who are breaking laws is always much larger than the number of people who get caught, charged, and convicted of same.

You can't ignore the deterrence component of laws. No one expects 100% compliance, and enforcement has time & $ limits.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 30, 2019
@FrankPasquale What I'm not seeing enough unpacking of, is the word 'data'.

What data? Without more detail, this cannot possibly be adequately broken down & understood, thereby proving useful to the task at hand.

The more general approach is via Information Paradigm: I/O = Time value (data=$)
@FrankPasquale Some i/o action we call 'work', and associate with a cost. Other work may not be. Some work we want to record, as it contributes to our Experience & Reputation, which are multipliers of T_v. The default choice should lie with the creator, or as an agreement between them & others.
@FrankPasquale The other part is the level of certainty of an ID. Take note from physics, as we went from 2D, to 3D/t, to 6 points in Space, to 10 dimensions of Spacetime. The lack of numerous verifications = pseudonymity. Only unique combinations reveal ID. Can collect generic info privately.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(