Now that the federal constitutional right to abortion is overturned, state policies matter more than ever
5 states have initiatives on the ballot this year that will shape abortion access – a record. Let's talk through them🧵
In terms of protective measures, voters in CA, MI and VT can vote to explicitly protect abortion rights in their state constitutions.
Why does this matter?
💪Strengthens state-level access to abortion
🚫Blocks additional restrictions
🎆Inspires action in other states
Proposition 1 in #California would protect the right to abortion, contraception & cement the state as a leader in abortion protections
It also ensures critical healthcare for 9.2 million women of reproductive age + trans & nonbinary patients + people traveling from other states
In #Michigan, Proposition 3 would add essential protections for pregnancy and abortion amid many neighboring states trying to ban abortion.
Amending the constitution would also help permanently block the 1931 pre-Roe ban from going into effect. It is now temporarily blocked.
#Vermont is another state that has long been a leader in abortion rights & access.
Proposition 5 on this year's ballot would protect "personal reproductive liberty" including decision-making on pregnancy, abortion, contraception & sterilization. Let’s go Vermont!
Not every measure on state ballots is positive.
#Kentucky has a total abortion ban & passing Constitutional Amendment 2 would mean the constitution provides NO protection for abortion.
Defeating this measure could set the stage for future progress on abortion rights.
In #Montana, proposed law LR-131 elevates a false anti-abortion narrative & would mandate providers sustain infants born at any stage, even those that are nonviable, or face severe penalties.
Providers say this would most negatively impact people with pregnancy complications.
The bottom line is: Abortion is totally banned in 12 states and unavailable in 2 more.
This means anyone who may need an abortion in those states – including 19 million women of reproductive age + trans & nonbinary people cannot access one in their community.
Battles to protect abortion access and reproductive health care have been & will continue to be fought primarily at the state level, now more than ever.
For more on abortion policies, demographic & abortion data by state, check out our interactive map: states.guttmacher.org/policies/
Oops, I meant "personal reproductive autonomy" in Vermont, not liberty. My apologies!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#BREAKING The #Oklahoma governor just signed a *total* abortion ban with a Texas-style enforcement mechanism. It goes into effect immediately making Oklahoma the first state to totally outlaw abortion since #RoeVWade in 1973. What this means 🧵
The impact will be disastrous for Oklahomans. It will also have severe ripple effects, especially for Texas patients who had been traveling to OK in large numbers after the TX 6-week abortion ban went into effect in September.
Some basic stats. In Oklahoma there are:
* 5 abortion providers (as of yesterday, they can no longer provide abortion care)
* 890,000 women aged 15-49 (plus people who can become pregnant who don’t identify as women)
BREAKING: The Idaho Governor just signed a ban on abortion a 6 weeks of pregnancy, making this the first state to enact a Texas-style “sue thy neighbor” copycat ban. Here’s why this is deeply worrying.
Idaho’s 6-week ban is scheduled to take effect in 30 days. Once in effect the ban will decimate access to abortion across the state and will force those who can to travel far distances to access abortion care and force other to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term.
The impact will be similar to Texas as patients, providers and practical support groups scramble to provide care. Texas patients have seen appointment wait times in neighboring states grow from 2 or 3 days to 3 weeks+. Those lost weeks are critical for those who need abortions.
We need to have an honest conversation about rape and incest exceptions for abortion bans.
This is becoming a talking point in news about Idaho’s “Texas-style” 6-week ban that passed Tuesday and includes a bounty-hunter enforcement mechanism.
When those who support abortion rights, including policymakers, focus on how abortion restrictions harm rape and incest survivors—and use exceptions to indicate how 'extreme' a bill is—the debate is then on exceptions rather than how a ban makes it harder for people to get care.
Beyond Idaho, this “rape/incest” talking point has been coming up in the 2022 legislative debates pretty often and its problematic for a number of reasons I’ll touch on below:
People keep asking me about abortion access in Indiana under then-Governor Pence. There’s a lot to cover, so here we go →
To start with, Indiana is one of 6 states considered *VERY* hostile toward abortion rights. That’s a big deal (think about how many bad bills have been enacted in recent years—Indiana is still more hostile than 44 states). guttmacher.org/article/2019/0…
Indiana has passed 63 abortion restrictions since Roe was decided in 1973—that’s the second highest number of restrictions in the US (Louisiana leads all states with 89). interactives.guttmacher.org/abortion-restr…