Kerala High Court is set to pronounce verdict on Kozhikode Sessions judge S Krishnakumar's plea against his transfer to a labour court.
The judge had come under the scanner for his controversial "provocative dress" order.
The HC registrar had opposed the plea stating that the transfer was effected in the general interest of administration of justice and that the judge had made unwarranted comments and used inappropriate methods while handling some cases
Kerala High Court SETS ASIDE the transfer of Kozhikode Sessions judge S Krishnakumar to a labour court following his controversial "provocative" dress order
A bench of Justices AK Jayasankaran Nambiar and Mohammed Nias CP delivered the verdict allowing judge Krishnakumar's appeal
1. 2014 amendment upheld with suitable reading down 2. Law laid down in RC gupta has been upheld
3. 3. For employees in service and were not allowed to exercise option pre 2014 under proviso to 11(3)— they shall be entitled to exercise said option under amended 11(4) #EPFO#SupremeCourt
4. For employees that have retired — if they retired prior to 2014– they cannot exercise the option— #EPFO#SupremeCourt
The Delhi High Court will hear today a plea to make Twitter's new owner and billionaire Elon Musk a party to a petition regarding suspension of Twitter account. #delhihighcourt@elonmusk
An application has been moved in an already pending petition before HC to make musk a party after a change in the ownership of Twitter.
Musk bought Twitter for over US$ 40 billion. #DelhiHighCourt#Twitter @elonmusk
The application argues that Musk has a very different approach to free speech and therefore his views are important to be heard. #DelhiHighCourt#Twitter#ElonMusk
#SupremeCourt to deliver judgment in appeals filed by Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation against a decision of the Kerala HC setting aside amendments on “determination of pensionable salary” under the Employees Pension Scheme (EPS) of 1995 as “ultra vires” #EPFO
EPFO had argued that the EPS would face a “complete collapse” if the Kerala High Court judgment was allowed to hold fort #Epfo
Case is around the controversial amendments made to Clause 11(3) of the EPS-1995 #EPFO
A court in UP awarded death sentence to two accused for gang rape and attempt to kill a minor girl.
"It's a pity that in our country, Maa Durga is worshiped as Shakti, Maa Saraswati is worshiped for learning, Maa Lakshmi is worshiped for wealth....in that country such heinous and brutal gang rape of a minor victim puts a question mark on the whole society" UP Court
"Why has our society become so narrow..why does he consider women around him present in form of goddesses to be objects of enjoyment from point of view of lust and does not leave not only adult women but also small girls for fulfillment of his lust' the judge states in the order
Husband counsel: She is highly educated, she is perfectly fit and fine. She is a PhD holder. Why she needs someone to accompany her to Pune? Moreover, why does she need a person in her life who doesn't want to live with her?
CJI UU Lalit: I quite see the forceful submission made by you.. unfortunately, the ethos which has developed in this court is.. convenience of the wife is paramount. Therefore, to say that wife can travel to Pune to Patiala, the same applies to husband as well.
CJI UU Lalit led bench takes up the case where it had directed the registry to furnish reasons why a case was not listed for over a year even though the case was ready for listing
CJI UU Lalit and Justice Bela Trivedi discuss the case #SupremeCourt
CJI:Pursuant to direction of this court on Nov 1, a report dated Nov 2 under signature of concerned registrar has been placed before us. The report makes a ref to certain acts of some of the officials. Before we take any view in the matter.