So far, the #POECommission testimony from convoy leaders has demonstrated that a) they absolutely wanted to force government change, b) they have zero regard for anyone who isn't part of their crew, c) they have an incorrect perception that they represent
the views of a majority of Canadians, d) they still feel that what they were doing was correct, justified, and maybe divinely ordered, e) they have a deep sense of entitlement and delusions of persecution, f) they can cry on cue for effect, g) they have a deeply flawed grasp
of Canadian civics, h) they harbour a lot of anti-social opinions, i) they have absorbed all the right-wing talking points about science, experts, etc, j) they are not taking the gravity of the charges against them seriously, k) they have testified in direct opposition to
documented evidence (i.e. they appear to perjure themselves often), and l) they are not done making trouble. They are quite similar to the Americans who believe, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that Trump was robbed of the presidency.
Indeed, many are self-declared Trump enthusiasts. And don't forget, a former Trump advisor was with them during the occupation. Paul Alexander was even too much for the Trump administration. cbc.ca/news/world/pau…
We may find the absurdity of the testimony thus far humourous, but we must not forget that this group actually does represent a clear and present danger to the public good. People with the same beliefs have blocked access to hospitals, intimidated school children,
attacked people for wearing masks, or going to get vaccines. Many favour overturning the democratic will of a majority of Canadians. These people are in the minority, but they are continuing to create problems far beyond their numbers.
We need to have some serious conversations in this country about how a civilized, compassionate, diverse society can deal with a fringe movement that refuses to abide by our laws, accept demonstrable facts, or respect the rights of others, without losing our own
moral compass and self-respect. It seems as though they are goading us to make their claims of tyranny, oppression, and crimes against humanity a reality. I expect they were disappointed that no one was seriously injured or killed when the convoys and blockades were cleared,
because then they could say, "See? What we are saying about Canada is true!" We must not back away from our principles of peace, order, and good governance. We must not allow ourselves to be drawn down. At the same time, we cannot simply allow this ongoing radicalization
and disruption to continue. So, what is to be done? What is the way forward? They see two paths; either we lay down and let them continue to foment insurrection, or we become as draconian as they are accusing us of being. We need to find a third option. There has to be a path
wherein this can be resolved without betraying our values of compassion, inclusion, human rights, justice, fairness, and fact-based policy. We need to find a way to defuse and de-escalate the situation, to discredit them without malice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@ZAlexSc And that is what all of this is about. Regime change. Keep in mind, conservatives will do and say anything, no matter how far-fetched, to get a few more votes. That little group that thinks our federal government could be responsible for price gouging by grocery chains,
@ZAlexSc That little group who thinks our federal government is responsible for global post-pandemic inflation. That little group who can be convinced that their gas and heating costs are personally profiting the PM. Low-information voters who can be persuaded to support the CPC is what
@ZAlexSc they are after. Small segments of voters here and there. It adds up. The CPC is hoping it adds up to giving them power. Once elected, they won't care at all what any of those segments think. Power is the thing. Then they can make good on their promises to developers,
There are reasons some people are electricians and some are architects and some are engineers and some are mechanics and some are epidemiologists... Our world is too complex for any of us to be an expert in everything. We have experts who have devoted countless hours to learning
their field and becoming really good at it. This is why, when your car makes a clunking noise & you are not a mechanic, you probably get a mechanic to look at it. Because you are good at something, but it's not that. Having specialized areas of expertise allows us to get through
our days without having to spend hours trying to figure out things that other people have already figured out. I am not sure why suddenly so many people are convinced that epidemiologists and scientists, and even their own doctors, are trying to kill them. It's a very curious
My husband and I went this evening and got our 2nd COVID booster shots (that's 4 shots for COVID now) & our flu shots. We did this because we are responsible adults & we trust science. We don't want to get sick & we don't want to risk making anyone else sick. #CovidIsNotOver
Well, that certainly was interesting. Hospitalization rates are higher now than in 2020 or 2021. There are a great many people who say the vaccines do nothing, or make you sick. Neither is true. COVID is a "Novel" virus. It evolves into new strains. This is why boosters are...
needed, just like we get a different flu shot every year. Being vaccinated, masking, avoiding crowds, etc all help to keep people safe. Also, apparently some R-W US talk radio host has some deep-pocketed sponsors who have funded an anti-vax film called "Sudden Deaths" or
Conservatives have conveniently divided the world into "law-abiding people" and "criminals". Yet, we are all capable of doing something criminal. Many have done illegal things and not got caught. Law-abiding vs criminal is a false dichotomy. #cdnpoli#guncontrol
Did you ever smoke weed before October 17, 2018? Have you ever rolled through a stop sign? Driven without your seatbelt? Driven above the posted speed limit? Fudged something on your taxes? Eaten something in a grocery store without paying for it? Been in a fist fight?
Been drunk and disorderly? Driven while under the influence? Made an exaggerated insurance claim? Failed to properly lock up your guns? If you have done any of these things, are you "law-abiding"? Or are you a "criminal"? It gets a bit vague, doesn't it?
Crowd-sourcing for suggestions here. On account of my husband flying so much for work (we joke that he's an airline seat-tester), we got a voucher for a companion. Sort of a 2-fer. Anyway, we are going to Paris. Anyone familiar with the city and surrounding area? Recommendations?
We're going in May. In case that makes any difference. Some places may be less busy or whatever in different seasons... We are both interested in history, but I feel could overdose on art galleries pretty quickly. Neither of us is into standing in line for a very long time.
I mean, you're in Paris! Why are you spending hours standing in a line? There has to be so many things you could be doing instead. I would rather miss some of the major tourist draws if it means I get to explore some really cool areas, instead of standing in a line for hours.
I can't believe how this convoy lawyer is trying to destroy Ms Lee's credibility. Her age, her job, people she knows, being 2022 co-chair for Leadership Summit for Action Chinese-Canadians Together, as if being 21, being a public employee, knowing Liberal and NDP 1/ #EAInquiry
politicians, and being Chinese-Canadian, invalidated what she was saying in her testimony. She said quite clearly that her actions were as a private citizen. He tried to make it sound like she was a pawn of the government, that she was too young to know what she was doing,
2/
that there was something disingenuous about her testimony or her role in the class-action lawsuit. And then he gets totally hung up on a passing reference she made in a speech to the movie, The Purge.
3/