A few facts about Tory MP, Marco Longhi - the new Honorary President of dangerously irresponsible far-right lobbying group, Turning Point UK, which is one of the organisations far-right terrorist Andrew Leak engaged with before petrol-bombing the Dover migrant centre.
Longhi grew up in Rome, the son of an Italian airline worker. He trained as a pilot & later studied at Manchester University, following this by working for a time in civil engineering. He then worked in the oil and gas industry, which included five years in South America.
In 1999, Longhi was elected as a Conservative councillor in Walsall, & became Mayor in 2017 and again in 2018.
He became the first Tory to represent Dudley North at #GE2019, after the incumbent, Ian Austin (independent, formerly Labour), stood down.
Following an interim report on the connections between colonialism & properties in care of the @nationaltrust, Longhi was among the signatories of a letter to The Telegraph from the "Common Sense Group" accusing the National Trust of being "coloured by cultural Marxist dogma".
On 23 August 2021, Prime Minister Boris Johnson appointed free-market extremist & Truss-supporter Longhi as the UK's trade envoy to Bolsonaro's Brazil.
In June, Longhi, in a private message directed to the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, about the #Rwanda asylum plan, said, "Archbishop, as you appear to feel so strongly about this, will you give up two of your palaces for illegal migrants and pay for their accommodation?"
On 1st November, two days after the far-right terrorism attack on a migrant centre by Andrew Leak, Longhi supported the use of the grotesque military metaphor of "invasion" used by Braverman to demonise those crossing the channel, & now he's TPUK's Honorary President... 🙋♂️🙋♂️🙋♂️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Really important research on attitudes to immigration, asking why politicians & policymakers do not prioritize pro-immigration reforms, even when public opinion on the issue is positive.
This research examines one previously overlooked explanation related to the systematically greater importance of immigration as a political issue among those who oppose it, relative to those who support it.
The research finds that "compared to pro-immigration voters, anti-immigration voters feel stronger about the issue & are more likely to consider it as both personally & nationally important."
'Understanding right-wing populism (and what to do about it)'.
'The continuing rise of right-wing populism may be stalled in some countries but the overall level of support is still strong. The challenge to liberal democracies is not over.'
"As progressives, we should remain vigilant in this debate and promote evidence-based political strategies addressing current & future right-wing populist challenges.
The report at hand is full of quantitative & qualitative evidence helping to formulate those strategies."
"The authors encourage readers to look beyond the populism dimension & focus their attention on the economic insecurities underlying supposedly cultural issues such as immigration and how right-wing populist parties (RWPPs) become successful in appealing to these insecurities."
Essential for understanding the rise of neofascist anti-immigrant rhetoric:
'Political elite discourses polarize attitudes toward immigration along ideological lines. A comparative longitudinal analysis of Europe in the twenty-first century'.
"Immigration is a hotly-debated topic in many countries around the world. We examine how immigration-related political elite discourses affect natives’ attitudes towards immigration & how these discourses contribute to polarisation along political & socio-economic dimensions."
Analysis draws upon strong evidence from "longitudinal cross-national data from the European Social Survey over 18 years & a genuine within-country estimator for both country-level main effects & cross-level interactions, controlling for actual immigration".
Many social media accounts on a range of platforms promote 'toxic masculinity', commonly referred to as the “manosphere”, which offers unhappy unfulfilled men a sense of belonging - it also overlaps with the return & rise of far-right ideology & activism.
Tate's dangerously irresponsible & profoundly misogynistic online grift 'academy' is called 'Hustler’s University' – a moneymaking scheme aimed at young men – encourages users to post videos of him to generate referrals.
One prominent barrister with knowledge of the discussions during October 2020 said that Braverman was fully aware that her intervention last week in the immigration debate was incendiary.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, they said: “At the very least, it was reckless. At worst, she knows it’s likely to instigate attacks. It’s either reckless or it’s deliberate and she’s got no concern for the consequences.
“The home secretary’s job is to ensure public safety, not to generate serious risk of harm to individuals.”Another senior legal source, who also asked not to be named, said: “Braverman was told directly of the risks such language was having on members of the profession.”
Extreme metaphors such as "invasion" enact images of an aggressive incursion by a foreign enemy force. They are mobilised deliberately, are offensive, inflammatory &/or derogatory, & as a result, are controversial & contested, & capable of being rejected.
Extreme metaphors such as "invasion" - especially when used by politicians - may attract critical media attention, as Suella Braverman's repeated use of the provocative & divisive term has done recently.