👓#BookReview
“Technology Is Not Neutral” by @hare_brain
London Publishing Partnership
harebrain.co/books

Here are my takeaways 🧶 + bonus track Image
Trade-Off:
Is Technology good or bad? We might refine our question further. For whom is it good or bad? Under what conditions is it good or bad? What unintended consequences might there be to using it? We’re confronted by trade-offs between security, privacy and freedom.
🤷‍♀️Are we Humans?
Tech is part of what makes us human. Only some of us create tech but we all use it, and we all have it used on us, sometimes without our knowledge and consent. Tech is at the interface between citizens and governments, btw consumers and companies...
Socio-technological view:
Technology is too important to be left to technologists. We need everyone to hold technology to account. The problem is that your data is not under your control.
🧠Intelligence:
AI is ‘neither artificial nor intelligent’ but rather a dynamic system of natural resources, energy consumption, human labour in the supply chain, and data extraction from websites and devices.
Ethics:
Technology ethics is not simply a checklist that we can delegate to one person or team to do once, and then forget about. It is a mindset. It is a conversation that is interdisciplinary, dynamic and iterative...
📡Surveillance:
There will always be investors who are happy to profit from surveillance, censorship and other controversial activities...In 2018 the official estimate was 6 million cameras in the UK (for a population of 66 million people, or one camera for every eleven people).
Biometrics (i)
There’s no need for a physical ID card when we can be identified by our DNA, our fingerprints, our faces, voices or other physical and behavioural characteristics. Biometrics include our DNA, our faces, voices, fingerprints, our eyes (retinas, irises)...
Biometrics (ii)
We can leave our smartphones behind but not our faces. You can shave your beard off. But you can’t shave your biometrics. Our biometrics cannot be reset unlike a username or a password. That is a problem, because they can be stolen and gathered without our consent
Biometrics (iii)
We already have an ID card that works nationally and internationally: our face. What we do not have is a proper legislative framework to protect that ‘ID card’ from being used and abused by the police, companies, foreign powers and each other.
Regulatory framework:
The United Nations Human Rights called in 2021 for a moratorium on the sale of and use of artificial intelligence technology – including facial recognition – that poses human rights risks.
Self-Regulation:
When some of the most powerful technology companies in the world are voluntarily restricting the use of their products and asking the government for regulation, it is time to pay attention
Bonus:
The End of Privacy? Ethical Questions for the Digital Era | WGS2022

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cristobal Cobo

Cristobal Cobo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cristobalcobo

Feb 13
Recommended reading:
“The New Childhood” @jordosh
8 key ideas (+ bonus track)

amazon.com/-/es/Jordan-Sh…
1# Critical Media Literacy: All the information we receive tends to confirm/reinforce what we already believe. We rarely have meaningful encounters with opposed ideas. So we’re rarely required to practice the intellectual humility that’s at the core of good critical thinking.
2# We’re educating cognitive agents: We’re preparing people to receive data, to decode it into information, and to exchange it as knowledge. A child is not a container, but rather a cognitive agent who decodes symbolic systems, creating contexts based on values and opinions.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 19, 2021
Uno de los mayores críticos actuales del uso de tecnologías para la educación Michel Desmurget (Director de investigación del Instituto Nacional de Salud de Francia) autor de “La fábrica de cretinos digitales”.


Aquí 20 frases destacables/inquietantes del libro + bonus track...
1.        Conviene preguntarse si esas maravillosas TIC para la educación han cumplido sus promesas. Para evitar equívocos, comenzaré por aclarar: mucha gente parece confundir (a veces voluntariamente) el aprendizaje «de» lo digital con el aprendizaje «a través de» lo digital.
2.       Tres ideas de esta verborrea: (1) la omnipresencia de las pantallas dieron lugar a una nueva generación de seres humanos, diferente a las anteriores; (2) los miembros de esta generación son expertos digitales; (3) el sistema escolar tiene que adaptarse a esta revolución.
Read 22 tweets
Dec 6, 2020
Book selection:

Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World @merbroussard mitpress.mit.edu/books/artifici…
‘techno-chauvinism’—the unrealistic belief that technology, and in particular #AI, can solve everything...
The author emphasizes the need for ‘human-in-the-loop’ systems where computers work in sync with, and augment the capabilities of, humans...
Read 6 tweets
Nov 5, 2020
¿Cuáles son las fortalezas de la educación presencial que se dificultan en la educación virtual?

Hilo de #LeccionesAúnNoAprendidas
La educación es un proceso transaccional, pero por sobre todo es fundamentalmente también relacional....
La educación presencial no es solamente para adquirir acceso a contenidos: Es también un espacio donde hay innumerables oportunidades para desarrollar de manera permanente habilidades socio emocionales, y adquirir valores para vivir en sociedad.
Read 18 tweets
Jul 20, 2020
New publication:
Commercialisation and privatisation in/of education in the context of Covid-19 Anna Hogan and Ben Williamson @eduint

9 take away ideas ↧
issuu.com/educationinter…
1. While #edtech has long been presented as a powerfully ‘disruptive’ force in education, during the ongoing #coronavirus crisis, new pandemic power networks have begun to coalesce around claims that edtech is not just disruptive, but palliative too.
2. "We need to think critically about how this [COVID] response might shape schooling for years to come. Our intention is to do so without taking a nostalgic view of pre-pandemic public education or a dystopic view of its commercialised future".
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(