2/ As always, personal opinion, but especially here, since this is speculative just a day in advance.
3/ Main point of the budget going to be both short term (2023) and long term (next few years) plan on reducing budget deficit. Both IMF driven but regardless, something SL needs to do.
4/ We've already seen a bulk of the tax policy measures already announced one way or the other. There could be some more as well here, including a possible wealth tax (possibly in the form of property/vehicle tax?).
5/ I've argued before on why the painful tax changes are necessary, so not going to go there again
6/ But I think there's a lot of pessimism about any further change on tax administration/collection as well as on expenditure management. Probably the comms from gov as well as the view of "protecting the corrupt" is tying into this.
7/ I think it's very unlikely that RW will push for something like the UN's StAR programme given the balance of power needed to pass the budget, outside of some token measures. unodc.org/unodc/en/corru…
8/ But because SOE reform including privatisation is a key part of the IMF programme too, as well as tax admin reform being critical for maintaining tax levels, I think there's a good chance of some progress beyond expectations on these too.
9/ To be clear, not expecting really good measures on either, but think something more than in a usual budget is probably likely. Because expectations are set somewhat low, this could be a bit of a "positive surprise".
10/ Expenditure allocations is another thing I'm looking at - because the top line numbers that often get quoted don't tell the film story.
Eg - health/edu exp is largely in Public Admin not in line ministries.
11/ Even capital expenditure might not be as simply reported, with some expenditures being in the budget but not really going to be expenditures. Interpretation will likely be needed.
12/ In any case, budget (once passed) is a critical step to recovering SL. Especially the framework it sets for the next few years will be critical to getting us out of this deficit and debt driven story of the past.
13/ Yes, it's also needed for the IMF programme, but that's mostly held up by the bilateral negotiations on arrears. If interested in more on that, can follow @TheoMaret who talks of this globally.
14/ But I'm cautiously optimistic that the budget WILL go in the direction needed to some degree. Part of it is that it's forced in a crisis, of course, but its progress nevertheless.
15/ Hopefully, this momentum continues and the new personal impetus people have also pushed further change.
That way perhaps we can get to a better future.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a hypothetical example to show the story of corruption and theft in Sri Lanka and why it's really painful to reverse it - for reasons that you might not realise!
2/ Let's assume some 20 years ago, in an election, a politician's crony friend donated some 100m LKR to an election campaign. In return, the crony wanted at least 200m LKR in profit a year in some way if the politician got elected.
3/ The politician gets elected. Now, he must help his crony friend.
Can he explicitly steal 200m and give every year? Nah, that's too easy to trace.
Instead, he creates an opportunity for the crony friend to earn that kind of money.
1/ These tax changes are sudden and unexpected, cause pain, and feel unfair for many. I'm going to try and make some sense of why this ended up so and what we can do about it.
2/ Personal views not reflecting anyone else. Twitter is also not a great place for this due to character limits - so this interview I did might be a better explanation.
3/ To start with - yes, these taxes are painful. There's no question about it. Yes, the pain will be different for different people - someone might have to cut down on a night of drinks with friends while someone else might struggle with debt.
1/ Corruption and tackling it is a key question, especially now that tax hikes have come in place. Noting down my thoughts on it and how we can move forward regarding the problem in my view.
2/ As always my personal view. This is how I see corruption in SL rather than any academic or "correct" way to see it (which doesn't exist obv). So discussion and questions welcome!
3/ I personally think of corruption as happening in one of 5 ways.
1. Outright theft and low-level bribes 2. Political expenses 3. Crony projects 4. Crony policies
1/ From a piece I wrote a few months ago but never got around to publishing. Vast majority of Sri Lankans have access to poor quality of life, and in a crisis, my view was that we should ideally focus on them. The piece is linked at the end.
2/ Of course, this is very much personal view and there are many flaws in this argument as its oversimplified a lot. But my hope was that this serves as a good basis to think and talk about inequality in Sri Lanka.
3/ The main idea is that concept of "middle class" or "lower class" or "upper class" is way too subjective and moral. Becomes very difficult to talk and make decisions based on it. Recent tax debate shows this as well.
With the new government finally expected to bring in an interim budget in August (fingers crossed), lets look at government expenditure, how high it really is, and what we can do about it.
Despite some belief that Sri Lanka has high expenditure levels, and we need to "cut down" on this - this is actually not the case.
Looking at the data shows that Sri Lanka actually has quite low government expenditure by global and regional standards.
(2/25)
If we look at a bunch of other countries that have similar debt related issues, this trend is even stronger - Sri Lanka's government expenditure is much lower than these other countries and in fact has been falling for a while