These are precisely the kind of 'Expert Views' that readers should avoid if the journalist doesn't use prudence in publishing.
A thread ....
Tech Layoffs | Mohandas Pai: TV Mohandas Pai’s advice for young techies: Work 12-14 hours, keep learning and save m.economictimes.com/markets/expert…
Instead of discussing the root cause behind tech layoffs, @TVMohandasPai espouses paternalistic advice to young techies.
The real root causes behind what ails the tech-workers globally: 1. Leadership greed - Layoffs are an attempt by leaders to fix business underperformance
....
2. Business underperformance is caused by irrational leadership exuberance - Tech leaders build irrational euphoria for the future, use investor money to scale up the workforce, and bloat up the cost structures.
....
3. Irrational leadership exuberance is fuelled by valuation dreams - All tech leaders exist in a parallel universe of start-up valuation methods, NOT in the world of true economic performance, except for the rare folks like @svembu of Zoho, @Nithin0dha of Zerodha etc.).
....
4. Some tech leaders do manage to achieve their valuation/IPO dreams and cash out to create wealth - These leaders run sweatshops to an IPO (some great examples in India). The tech leaders are now VCs in their own right using capital from the liquidation of their holdings.
....
5. Now the tech leader turned VC goes in the search of even more wealth from venture investing - The scale of aspiration is now even bigger. Now the venture capital needs to deploy in even more sweatshop bets. But one issue is the backlash against the work & employer ethics.
...
6. The tech leaders now need to evangelize 'sweat ethics' to deflect the backlash against the tech industry - There's a lot of money now in play. Tech leaders cannot allow any 'uprising' against work overload for low compensation. The attrition is out of whack, payroll costs ...
....are on the rise, there's a lot of unhappiness and the business is not performing to plan. How does one justify the layoffs?
The tech industry tries to declare layoffs as the new normal. It will happen. Accept it. Learn to live with it...
and here is 'sweat work mainfesto'...
"First 10 years of life work 12-14 hrs/day. Work-life balance? Work is life! You get laid off unless you are productive. It is a battle to the death. Compete with everybody and do better to keep job secure."
....
"Ask not why the layoffs are happening. OR who is to be held accountable. Resign to the fate the tech industry is doling out to you. That's what is expected of you. Don't ask us to be accountable."
I was on Twitter Spaces recently on 'moonlighting'. ....
A participant shared "Tech workers in the valley have lost faith in leadership." Not long before this spreads worldwide.
The signs are already there. Since the dot-com bubble attrition, offer drops, wage escalation, and disengagement have plagued the tech industry.
...
The current lay-offs will further accelerate these trends.
Tech workers have known all along how mercenary tech founders, leaders, and investors are.
....
They see through the hollow preachings of these leaders about loyalty, commitment, & performance.
Tech workers will now ask for the same in return. Quid pro quo.
Here’s a commentary on two Indian disasters - Our legal system and customer service.
I bought a SUV from @MercedesBenzInd in 2012. They guys who sold it convinced me to go for the Star Lease program from Daimler Finance so that I could upgrade to the latest model every 3 years.
My lease program was a premium one, my all inclusive insurance was a premium one and even my monthly EMI was a premium one. All was fine for 4-5 months. Then I had my first trust with destiny - sent it for a service camp.
The GL350 came back with a big dent on the tailgate.
My complaint was immediately responded to by giving me a standby C Series car while it went back to the service center for ‘repairs’.
This cycle repeated over the ensuing months and by the time 2 years were over, my SUV had spent 2 months in the service center while I drove C /
Here is a Public Service thread that demonstrates determination. My determination.
I have been craving beer for ages. So decided to register for a liquor license on Maharashtra Govt Excise portal anticipating the begining of home delivery by @swiggy_in sometime soon.
Now the experience of applying for this - “Permit for purchase, possession, transport, use and consumption of Foreign Liquor and Country Liquor in the State of Maharashtra (Annual or lifelong Permit) i.e. license in Form FL-XC granted under the Mumbai Foreign Liquor Rules,1953”
What If we needed to abandon Learning & Development as we know it today?
I am suggesting we rename Learning & Development as Try, Refine, Learn. But the forces are stacked against it.
Who will object?
The global corporate learning market is estimated to be $ 18.5 billion in a couple of years. How good is it? Well, given the size of the market it is pretty good for the product and service providers. But for the learner it is the exact opposite.
Whereas the objective of learning is to ‘create new knowledge’ almost all corporate learning providers are designed to package ‘existing or old knowledge’ and share it with learners. I would rather say ‘Forced Learners’. Content packaged as ‘knowledge’ and delivered to employees.
With the scenes of queues outside liquor stores from across India unfolding, one can make this statement (with statistical confidence):
INDIA HAS A MASSIVE ALCOHOLISM PROBLEM.
It’s time for us to leapfrog to a marijuana + hemp economy.
Sequel 1 - @BYJUS future is very threatened...
The original poster boys of Edtech disruptors in India were:
A. Tutorvista - Sold to Pearson starting in 2009 and then (coincidence of coincidences) acquired by BYJUs in 2017.
The famous founders of Tutorvista never ever forayed into education although they’re successful serial entrepreneurs - BigBasket, Protea, Bluestone, HomeLane etc.
Let me make an unpopular comment - @BYJUS future is very threatened.
Here’s my reasoning: 1. ‘Avg revenue/user doesn’t stack up’ - As per this news it has 2.4 mill paying customers and a 2019 Revenue of $78 mill (from Wikipedia).
The Revenue/User translates to ~Rs 2,500. This is strange given:
a. BYJUs success is largely school student led
b. They don’t have a single product priced below Rs 30,000
What’s the erosion from?
Let’s assume that it is 2019 Revenue figure and the Paid user base is 2020. Even then the story doesn’t add up. They are supposed to be growing at a 3 yr avg of 400%.