THREAD: @ECIU_UK report out today asks whether the Big Four emitters - China, the US, the EU and India - are likely to cut emissions faster than their headline targets indicate eciu.net/analysis/repor…
TL:DR - the answer, for three of the four, is 'yes'
We're used to hearing that China under-promises and over-delivers. Certainly the real-world stats and trends in clean energy are big and fast-moving
One example: early this year think-tank @CREACleanAir estimated there were 600GW of renewables in the pipeline to 2025. Just months later they upgraded this to 870GW, so fast were new plans coming through
Sales of EVs this year are forecast to be 6 million - twice the figure for non-EVs last year. Carmaker BYD has stopped building fossil-fuelled models already, and five times more EV chargers will be rolled out than in the rest of the world combined
Yes, coal-fired power stations are still being built... but increasingly, to back up cheaper renewable generation. Which puts coal progressively in a battle with energy storage for an application that storage is designed for and coal-fired power stations aren't. Only one winner
It's a similar picture in India. Over this decade the National Electricity Plan projects a coal power station expansion of 20% - & a solar expansion of 250%. Installed capacity of renewables will comfortably exceed even peak demand cea.nic.in/wp-content/upl… reducing coal to back-up
Private sector is already poised to build 86% of the solar target. So provided storage is cheap and plentiful and grid connections adequate, coal is fast heading for the exit (big chance for international funding like a JET-P to support grid & storage)
The EV numbers are impressive for India too, mainly in 2- and 3-wheelers. Projections vary from 49% to 90% compound annual growth - re-iterating, compound growth - through the 2020s
In the EU the rationale is about more than climate change and cheap solar power. Putin's war has changed the entire conversation
Now, the clean energy transition doesn't only deliver for climate change, air pollution and energy bills, but also for energy security, industrial growth and foreign policy independence
OPEC+'s decision to keep restricting supply is also a factor npr.org/2022/10/05/112…. European governments have already shelled out an estimated €674bn to keep energy bills affordable
If OPEC+ is to deliberately keep the price of oil and gas high, similar sums may be needed year after year - which will quickly become unaffordable - unless and until Europe cuts its fossil fuel dependence
In response the EU has increased targets on energy efficiency and renewables build to 2030, which should lead to over-achievement of its 55% NDC target by 2-3% climateanalytics.org/media/1-5pathw…
But could it go further? Many EU member states have implemented their own measures to cut gas use and boost clean energy rollout bruegel.org/dataset/nation…
And businesses and individual decisions may play a role. EV sales are increasing market share, heat pumps too (34% growth annually). Like renewables and batteries, we can expect cost reductions as the market expands. Will the impact of all this take the EU beyond that 2-3%?
Which, of the big four emitters, leaves the US. Here, there are more political uncertainties. But the recent mid-term election results suggest that implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act and other measures will go ahead
That means clean technologies could be supplying a massive 85% of US electricity by 2030 energyinnovation.org/wp-content/upl…. Big advances in energy efficiency, EVs etc also likely
...all of which could lead to a cut in US emissions of 32-42% below 2005 levels by 2030 - still short of the US NDC target of 50-52%
Could faster action at state level (eg California, Illinois) provide faster carbon-cutting? Unsure - the gap to the NDC number is quite big
Nevertheless... for three of the Big Four, we find strong signs that headline targets will be exceeded. Of course it would be advantageous if their NDCs included the implications of all this real-world progress - a big aid to transparency - but maybe that will come in time
Those claiming @KemiBadenoch rowed back on the UK 2050 #NetZero target yesterday appear to have missed the main point. Which is, that a target needs a plan, and is useless without. She's not wrong
And yesterday's High Court ruling theguardian.com/environment/20… confirms that the next PM will need to develop a better plan than exists right now
In the course of doing that, the next PM (whether @KemiBadenoch or any other #ToryLeadershipContest contender) would take briefings from real experts rather than Tufton St has-beens and would discover that a) the 2050 target is not arbitrary but based in science and fairness,
THREAD: At last year's UN climate summit #COP26 in Glasgow, governments recognised the paucity of their carbon-cutting plans for this decade and urged each other to make new ones before the end of this year
'...requests Parties to revisit and strengthen the 2030 targets in their nationally determined contributions as necessary to align with the Paris Agreement temperature goal by the end of 2022...' is the exact wording unfccc.int/sites/default/…
As enshrined in the UN climate convention, prosperous nations have a duty to go first
I'm not going to argue that the Russian state or any of its agencies never campaigned against fracking in the West, because I don't know - it's certainly credible that they would have done so
But on the part of the frackophiles, there is no evidence that Russia funded environment groups. Rather, one quote and one report circulate endlessly, as though they gain credibility through repetition.
Three pieces in @Telegraph today, two in @TheSun, and Jacob Rees-Mogg all cheerleading ‘gas, gas gas’ – during an energy price crisis caused by gas dependence, which increasing gas production cannot solve
The short version: gas extracted in British fields doesn't belong to Britain, it's owned by commercial companies who sell to the highest bidder. No way to change that except by export controls or public ownership - good luck with either of those
Production in UK would always be tiny compared to Russia etc who can and do manipulate supply and prices for political reasons
THREAD: Something curious turns up in the gas statistics released this morning by government
Curious because at a time of eye-wateringly high gas prices, with Vladimir Putin at the Ukraine's door, with warnings of dire outcomes everywhere and the oil industry telling us that continuing UK oil and gas extraction is necessary for energy security ogauthority.co.uk/news-publicati…
...at a time when politicians like @RobertJenricktelegraph.co.uk/news/2022/01/2… are urging 'us' to increase 'our production' of oil and gas to avoid exposure to internationally-sparked price hikes...