The #cop27 closing is now underway. And multiple contentious issues remain open. The stocktaking session following the formal session featured multiple report backs from Ministers charged with seeking consensus in contentious areas.
The second facilitating minister, from Australia on Climate Finance progress.
Singapore on Article 6 (ETS) and related issues.
Denmark and South Africa on the Mitigation (emissions reduction) work program.
Part 2.
Loss & Damages 1/2
2/2 German Federal Climate Policy Commissioner Jennifer Morgan on Loss & Damages.
This was followed by an report back from the Presidency on progress. Unfortunately the video of this is corrupted.
As is the intervention by @TimmermansEU that followed in which he repeated a statement made earlier in a press conference agreeing to the demand for the establishment of a Loss & Damage fund. Whilst also requesting a “mosaic” of other mechanisms to deliver a full package.
There has been some resistance to insurance based mechanisms in this area from developing countries. @TimmermansEU received a round of applause for his remarks but the debate was far from over.
Several interventions on this - the most contentious issue in #cop27 followed including this one from Ghana on behalf of the Africa Group.
Part 2.
At which point Norway responded.
Norway here repeats the European position in these talks (note that Norway is not a member of the EU):
I.E. that a maximum warming of 1.5 degrees needs to remain the goal as agreed in Glasgow.
He also repeats the European position linking Loss & Damages efforts to mitigation…
Which argues that without effective mitigation efforts, loss & damage impacts will spiral out of control and become so common as to be unaddressable.
This was followed by a series of developing nation statements on this subject from:
Pakistan
Bolivia
Colombia and others further hammering home the point about the scale of the loss & damage that is already occurring.
China spoke out in support of the G77 on this issue and has also agreed to contribute to the fund. And the UK also made an intervention.
Notably absent from the discussion was the other economic super power, the US.
At the end of all this the COP president Sameh Shoukry said he would hold a another stocktaking meeting at 12pm tomorrow to assess how much progress has been made overnight.
Tomorrow is the scheduled end for #cop27, but there are numerous precedents for extensions.
Last year in Glasgow a similar situation arose and COP concluded on Saturday, but there are several precedents for the discussions continuing into Sunday.
COP has only once failed altogether to reach a consensus. In 2000 in the Netherlands. enb.iisd.org/events/unfccc-…
The 2000 failed COP then resumed in the middle of 2001 in Bonn, Germany, and this may be the precedent followed should #COP27 fail, which now appears to be a possibility.
Europe is particularly motivated to avoid this outcome as Europe is now fully mobilised to accelerate its mitigation and renewable energy plans, in part spurred on by the Energy Crisis caused by the war in Ukraine.
A failure in Egypt could result in criticism at home.
However the triple crises of Covid, Climate and the Ukraine war may have improved the European public’s understanding of risk, and improved public resilience to political setbacks.
A small video tribute to the Scottish Govt. which bravely kicked off the #LossAndDamage implementation pathway last year at #cop26 in Glasgow by establishing a loss and damage fund unilaterally and putting 5 million pounds in it. This was dropped however on the final day.
The Loss & Damage Text was signed off about an hour and a half ago in a meeting convened by the Presidency with only final modifications from the penultimate text.
The Loss and Damage Fund will be established and become tentatively operational at #cop28 in Dubai.
This information is as confirmed from s sources in the meeting. Those present in the meeting included US, EU, UK, G77 an African Minister, Switzerland and others. This has effectively removed the most significant hurdle from #Cop27 concluding successfully later today.
Video thread of a standup yesterday afternoon in the Cairo Press Conference Room with Eamon Ryan, the European Union's lead negotiator in 'loss and damage. 1/5
Loss & Damages has emerged as the most contentious of five areas in the negotiations in which the parties are yet to finalise agreed texts.
[Quoted thread ... Earlier thread covering part of the stocktaking session discussion of #LossAndDamage last night.
The remarks in response to the unfathomably misguided questions from the TPLF congressman from California @BradSherman in this clip are to be expected. He’s on their payroll.
As an active participant/sponsor of this peace, as well as someone who is fully aware of the facts in this war, the misrepresentations in Sherman’s questions ought to have been challenged by Phee not assented to.
For many Ethiopians, the humouring (at best) and apparent concurrence by Phee with the unfounded allegations and tone of the Congressman by @AsstSecStateAF will be received as if it is yet another US gut punch, bringing back the worst days in 2021.
The Nefertiti Plenary room. The Closing Plenary has begun. During this process documents from a range of different bodies, which together make up the decisions of the COP (conference of the parties to the @UNFCCC convention) are formally adopted.
One of the first items in this is the invitation to #COP28 to be held in Dubai next year. A representative for the UAE 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates made an inspirational statement about the work of the COP.
Three decisions submitted by the SBSTA were then adopted without objection. Under the headings of SBI decisions there were two interventions, one from Armenia about discrimination and two about #LossAndDamage from Antigua and Barbados and one from Colombia.
There are parts of this briefing which may be annoying/patronising. But it needs to be read in the context that the US very much continues to seek credit for its involvement in this peace.
This passage in particular indicates a very high level of US ownership of delight in the positivity of this news.
There is no evidence in particular of Victoria Nuland or Wendy Sherman ever showing any interest in this war at all.
To the extent the US can claim any credit for this peace - a claim which needs to be considered in the context of repeated U.S. govt actions which prolonged this war - the only US officials who deserve credit here are @AsstSecStateAF Molly Phee and @MikeHammerUSA.