We’ve signed an open letter @RishiSunak on how the #OnlineSafetyBill threatens UK cybersecurity. The Bill introduces content scanning on our devices, compromising end-to-end encryption for individuals and business @encryption_day
Installing content scanning software on our devices with access to our private messages and images is an open goal for the surveillance of an entire population.
If you create an opening, anyone can walk through it. Content scanning software punches a hole in the security of our devices, leaving us all exposed to hackers and bad actors.
“When Australia passed a similar law undermining end-to-end encryption in 2018, the Australian digital industry lost an estimated $AUS 1 billion in current and forecast sales and further losses in foreign investment”
With a backdoor to your devices through content scanning software, criminals will have greater access to the personal data of the most vulnerable in society, including children.
The latest in government wishful thinking has dropped.
@SuellaBraverman takes to @Telegraph with claims about encryption that don't stack up.
There's a failure to grasp how the Online Safety Bill will harm privacy, despite repeated warnings from experts. openrightsgroup.org/press-releases…
Experts have explained that any compromise of end-to-end encryption to detect CSAM can add 'backdoors'.
This will expose users to hackers accessing personal information and messages. It'll put the very people who the government claims to be protecting at risk. #OnlineSafetyBill
Braverman refers to the Safety Tech Challenge Fund, funded by the government to look at tools for detecting CSAM on encrypted systems.
An evaluation of five of those projects shows the confidentiality of users' comms can't be guaranteed. #OnlineSafetyBill bpb-eu-w2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.bristol.…
⚠️ The government has announced revisions to the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. It appears that the revised version will be worse than the last, posing a greater threat to our privacy rights. Our response to today's announcement. #DPDIBillopenrightsgroup.org/press-releases…
"The UK has an opportunity to create a world-leading data protection law that puts people’s privacy rights at the fore, and aligns with our biggest markets. Instead, this appears to be an attempt to take power from citizens and give it to government" @burkeabigaile#DPDIBill
@burkeabigaile The revised #DPDIBill fails to address the privacy concerns raised by civil society, despite our open letter signed by 26 organisations. In fact the Bill expands the ways that businesses and government bodies can process, use and re-use our data. openrightsgroup.org/press-releases…
Yesterday we sent an urgent open letter to @michelledonelan with 25 other civil society groups. We called on the government to scrap the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill and the attack on our data protection rights. Here's why.
@michelledonelan The #DPDIBill lowers the threshold for organisations to refuse a Subject Access Request and removes individuals’ right to not to be subjected to solely automated decision making. 2/7
@michelledonelan The independence of the @ICOnews will be reduced by the #DPDIBill. As the ICO plays a key part in the oversight of the government’s use of data, this is extremely problematic. 3/7
🚨Twitter Passports are dangerous and impractical 🚨
Banning anonymity online will not solve the issue of abuse and will actually make people
less safe. THREAD (1/9)🧵
First, a massive amount of online abuse comes not from anonymous accounts but from those who are happy to spout hate in their own name. 99% of Twitter accounts suspended for racism during Euro 2020 were NOT anonymous. (2/9)
Second, most “anonymous” content is not actually anonymous. In nearly all cases, the individual can be identified via other details held by a platform if it becomes necessary. (3/9)