Simona Cristea Profile picture
Dec 7, 2022 27 tweets 11 min read Read on X
Can we outsmart #cancer and stop it before it even starts?

Our brand new paper🔥@NatureComms reveals a novel stem-like cell population directly related to #breast tumor initiation.

Let's dig in🧵🧵 Image
First, quick background.

Sadly, everybody reading this knows breast cancer.

It is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women, with a staggering 1 in every 8 women in the world receiving this diagnosis throughout their lifetimes.
Multiple factors have been shown to modulate breast cancer risk.

You might already know that:

An active lifestyle🏃‍♀️, a good diet 🥦 or breastfeeding 🤱 are protective, while high breast density, radiation exposure or hormone replacement therapy are detrimental. Image
Unfortunately, what you might not know is that the absolute risk reduction from such protective lifestyle factors is depressingly modest.

But, make no mistake and prepare to be shocked😳.

Breast cancer is one of the very few cancers that can be effectively prevented!
Enter Pregnancy🤰

A single full-term early pregnancy (< 25 yrs) decreases the lifelong risk of hormone receptor positive breast cancer (85% of all breast cancers) by an unbelievable 40%.

Later first pregnancies (> 30 yrs) are still protective, but less so. Image
Unfortunately, in practice, preventing breast cancer is not that easy. On the contrary.

We all know that full-term early pregnancies are not feasible as a population-level breast cancer prevention strategy.
There’s more:

The lifelong breast cancer risk of BRCA1/2 germline mutation carriers 🧬 is even further increased‼️ by pregnancies, reaching an unbelievable 80% for BRCA1+ carriers with one child. Image
The natural question now becomes:

Can we mimic the protective effect of early🤰with a 💊?

Let's try!

But in order to do this, we need to first map out the mechanisms by which pregnancy decreases breast cancer risk.
Past data @LabPolyak shows that p27+ (CDKN1B+) progenitors with high TGFB pathway activity are decreased after pregnancy.

Therefore, TGFB could regulates the proliferation & pool size of hormone-responsive mammary epithelial progenitors which are cell of origin in breast cancer. Image
If so,modulating the TGFB pathway could modulate breast cancer risk.

Let's test this.

1.Strategy🧭
Deplete p27+ progenitors via inhibition of TGFB. Decreasing these progenitors could prevent tumors.

2.Intervention⚡️
Short treatment with TGFB Receptor1 inhibitor in 2 rat models
In a mind-boggling experiment, after treating rats with the inhibitor (TGFBRi) for 10 days, we expose them to a potent carcinogen.

90% of untreated rats develop tumors, whereas only 40% of treated rats do!

‼️In other words: 50% of rats are tumor-free because of the treatment😯 Image
Digging deeper:

1. The treated rats have fewer tumors which develop later.

2. The mammary glands of tumor-free animals are histologically normal.

Hence: This treatment 💊 has a long-term cancer preventive effect without perturbing normal mammary physiology.

Why is this?
Enter molecular #scRNAseq data 🧬

We find that the TGFBRi treatment promotes epithelial features (shifted keratin distribution), and that all 3 main breast mammary gland epithelial populations (basal, luminal progenitor, mature luminal) are heavily perturbed by the treatment. Image
Surprisingly, in the single cell data, the TGFBRi treatment induces cell cycle proliferation of progenitors, as shown by unique groups of cells with strong expression of proliferation and cell-cycle markers popping up after treatment. Image
The most striking treatment-induced change is how a totally novel population with both epithelial basal & secretory features emerges right after treatment.

We term them Secretory Basal Cells (SBCs).

We identify SBCs in both rat strains and create a SBC characteristic signature. Image
We characterize SBCs in great detail, via experiments & computational analyses.

SBCs have strong mammary epithelial stem cell features. They are enriched in Terminal End Buds, a specialized structure consisting of stem cells & guiding pubertal mammary development & cancer risk. Image
Again surprisingly, SBCs are enriched in tissues from the mammary gland of high-risk conditions (women without any pregnancy-nulliparous vs. women with pregnancies-parous), as well as in tissues from BRCA1/2+ carriers.

Hence,SBCs are positively associated with breast cancer risk Image
Interactome analysis shows a central role for SBCs in the mammary epithelium.

SBCs are the most active cell type (highest number of connections/cell) and they most actively regulate insulin-IGF signaling, a critical pathways for mammary gland development & breast cancer risk. Image
Finally, we also validate the epithelial nature and presence of the SBC subpopulation experimentally in rat organoid data from both control and TGFBRi-treated rats.

In treated rats, this population is expanded, confirming SBC enrichment following treatment. Image
Let's recap📚

1. A novel breast epithelial population (SBC) emerges right after a TGFBRi short-term treatment which prevents tumors in 2 rat models.

2. SBCs are associated with increased proliferation.

3. SBCs are stem-like.

4. SBCs are enriched in high-risk cancer conditions
Taken together, these observations seem counter-intuitive🤔

But, biology is complex. What we believe is actually happening:

Treatment💊
⬇️
Transient increase📈in progenitor proliferation
⬇️
Long-term depletion of the progenitor pool
⬇️
Lifelong decrease📉in breast cancer risk Image
Take home messages‼️

1. Breast cancer is one of the few cancers for which a potent natural prevention strategy does exist.

Understanding the underlying mechanisms by which this happens is an immense opportunity still hidden in plain sight.
2. Breast cancer can be prevented by targeting TGFB-responsive mammary epithelial progenitors in 2 different rat models.

This offers preclinical evidence for the design of breast cancer prevention strategies initially targeting women at high risk of developing breast cancer 🧬
However, our results are still very preliminary.

There are immense challenges ahead on the way to clinical implementation⛰️

We’re thinking about these issues a lot and doing follow-up studies and experiments.
We believe cancer prevention is the future.

Cancers are evolutionary beasts. Fighting them is hard. Current cancer treatments are complicated & often don't work.

This is why stopping cancer before it starts is the way forward.

This is real & possible.
All #Bioinformatics #DataScience code and materials to support these results is on GitHub github.com/csimona/tumor-…

The raw and preprocessed genomics data is on GEO 0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/geo/query/acc.…

Preprocessed #RStats objects can be downloaded from Zenodo zenodo.org/record/7293642…
Finally, here is the link to the @NatureComms paper. Read it and get it touch!

This was a monumental effort spanning many years together with @LabPolyak @nellage & so many wonderful colleagues @DanaFarber @harvardmed @dfcidatascience

Thank you all!

nature.com/articles/s4146…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simona Cristea

Simona Cristea Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @simocristea

Feb 1
Impressive advancement in Computational Pathology.

A new multimodal foundation model by @AI4Pathology trained on 47,000 paired histology & genomics, which beautifully shows the multi-modal power of images & DNA & RNA

Even though patient genomic data is rare, it's so powerful 🧵 Image
First, why is this model so important?

To my view, THREADS is the closest we have today to a cancer-level patient-centric foundation model.

It beautifully integrates lots of images, DNA & RNA - 3 data modalities providing critical orthogonal information about cancerous tissues
For some background:

Computational Pathology has been really revolutionized by Deep Learning (arguably like no other cancer-related field).

It turns out that the usual slides that pathologists read to diagnose & investigate tumors are very "learnable"

developer.nvidia.com/blog/whole-sli…
Read 19 tweets
Jan 22
Many people wonder what is the scientific evidence behind what @sama & Larry Ellison said today
at The White House: that AI will cure cancer.

Truth is that this is not a hype. The potential of AI to accelerate cancer discoveries like never before is enormous.

Here’s why🧵
To start with: cancer is a very difficult problem. Funded with several billion dollars from the US government alone over the past few years, cancer survival has only marginally improved & incidence is actually increasing in younger people. That’s not good, in fact it’s really bad
Why is this though? Why haven’t we been able to cure cancer?

It’s because cancer is a very adaptable disease.

It’s not that we don’t have treatments for cancer. We have hundreds of them.

But tumors are versatile. They change states often during treatments & become resistant.
Read 17 tweets
Jan 16
Cancer statistics in 2025 🇺🇸- new report 🚨

Cancer is becoming a new disease.

We're seeing a fundamental shift in who gets cancer, moving from a predominantly male, elderly disease to one that increasingly affects women and younger people.

Key highlights 🧵Image
Image
1. New Cancer Cases and Deaths in 2025:

An estimated 2,041,910 new cancer cases will be diagnosed.

Approximately 618,120 cancer deaths will occur.

This equals about 5,600 new cases and 1,700 deaths per day.
2. Progress:

Cancer death rates have declined continuously through 2022, preventing nearly 4.5 million deaths since 1991.

This progress is attributed to reduced smoking, earlier detection, and improved treatments.
Read 10 tweets
Dec 31, 2023
To end 2023, I’ll share one of the most insightful & well-written papers I read in 2023.

This study @Nature links *spatial* tumor organization to immunotherapy response in breast cancer.

Immunotherapy is our strongest weapon against cancer. We need to understand it better.
🧵🧵 Image
Long thread ahead, going deep into the molecular workings of breast cancer immunotherapy.

TL;DR:
1. Cancer–immune interactions & proliferative fractions predict immunotherapy response
2. Both pre-treatment & on-treatment predictors
3. Immunotherapy remodels the microenvironment
The paper is about triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

TNBC lacks ER & PR hormone receptors and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) activity.

It is the most aggressive of the 4 breast cancer subtypes.

Responds poorest to treatment & has higher prevalence in younger women. Image
Read 41 tweets
Oct 31, 2023
New: the monthly roller-coaster through October’s coolest life science papers is here 🚀🧬

3-sentence summaries of papers on evolution, single cell methodologies, genetic screens & more.

And, only for October, an educational video on fighting cancer🤺 as a bonus.

Enjoy 3x10! Image
1. Assembly theory (Sharma et al., Nature)

The most (in)famous paper I read this month proposes a new framework (assembly theory, that is) to explain basically everything… or, more specifically, “to unify descriptions of evolutionary selection across physics and biology” 1/3 Image
This paper is not an easy read for anybody (in particular evolutionary biologists), but, to its merit, it sparked scientific discussions by being different than what is expected for a scientific paper describing evolution. 2/3
Read 38 tweets
Sep 22, 2023
The human genome is gradually unravelling its secrets 🎁

AlphaMissense model @ScienceMagazine: one more path lit up by deep learning in exploring the code of life 🧬

We now know with high confidence if 89% of ALL missense variants are benign or pathogenic

Key contributions🧵🧵 Image
First things first:

Missense variants = genetic variants (i.e DNA bases) that change the amino acid sequence (i.e groups of 3 bases, building blocks of proteins) in proteins.

Missense variants are more important than non-missense ones, as more likely to have functional impact. Image
Now, even if a variant changes the amino acid structure of a protein (i.e it is missense), it is not necessarily that the variant also impacts the function of its corresponding protein.

Further, even if protein function gets impacted, it isn't clear in which way or by how much.
Read 41 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(