Tuomas Malinen Profile picture
Dec 8, 2022 14 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Seven charts to explain, why the U.S. is heading into a #recession (which is unlikely to be "mild"). 🧵

Let's start with the most problematic one: the yield curves. Many read these like the Bible, and they rarely have gotten it wrong. However, this time there's a problem.
1/14 Image
Our first-ever U.S. #recession call, in March 2019, predicting the beginning of an U.S. recession in early 2020, was based on the inversion of the yields of the Treasuries with 10-year and 3-month maturities.

But, they are being manipulated. 2/
gnseconomics.com/2019/03/27/rec…
This is depicted in the strange divergence of the 10y/3mo and 10y/2y spreads in early 2022 shown in the figure above. I explained this in detail in my @EpochOpinion piece in May.

Main point: purchases of Treasuries by the #Fed are twisting the curves. 3/
theepochtimes.com/recession-come…
I summarized the situation as:
"In any case, because of the quantitative easing (QE) and QT, the whole bond market is a mess, and all signals from it should be interpreted with a heavy grain of salt."

More on QT here.👇
4/
theepochtimes.com/the-failure-of…
Yet, we can argue that because the inversion is so large now, it probably holds true, but we need some information outside the bond markets to verify this.

Such verifications can be found from bank, more precisely on bank lending standards, and debt data. 5/
The share of banks tightening lending standards has been a reliable #recession indicator. It gave a warning even right before the artificial 2020 recession caused by the lockdowns.

So, here are the three main bank lending charts all showing the same thing. 6/ ImageImageImage
They show than #banks are tightening standards in all their lending activities for corporations and for credit cards. However, this is not enough to guarantee the arrival of a #recession , by itself.
Corporations, for example can seek funding from the bond markets.
7/
However, first note that U.S. corporations are more indebted than ever in total terms, but also when compared to their income base (gross domestic product). Firms are effectively "swimming" in #debt .

How are their interest payments (yields) behaving then?
8/ Image
Unsurprisingly, not good. Interest rate hikes and QT of the #FederalReserve have pushed yields of corporate bonds considerably higher in practically all credit-rated classes.

Alas, the ability of U.S. firms to borrow more is becoming gravely limited.
9/ Image
Moreover, some corporations are likely to face problems of maintaining their debt sustainability (interest payments + the principal).
This concerns especially the so-called zombie corporations. Mass bankruptcies loom.
10/
theepochtimes.com/zombie-corpora…
So, because firms are more indebted than ever, banks are tightening lending standards on their loans and because yields of their bonds are their 13-year peak, corporations will be forced to cut spending, and some (mostly 'zombies') are likely to fail.
11/
This implies layoffs, possible on a massive scale, less investment spending and less corporate consumption.

These will eat further into the income of, rather heavily indebted, households who are already suffering from high interest rates and tightening lending standards.
12/ Image
Alas, the U.S. is, almost certainly, heading into a #recession during the first two quarters of next year.

The massive problems in #Europe , however, may (are likely to) turn the approaching recession to something more sinister. 👇😬
13/
mtmalinen.substack.com/p/european-deb…
In the worst-case, we will see a very destructive loop of falling household consumption, wide-spread bankruptcies and mass layoffs feeding falling consumption.
It would lead to existential banking problems and to an outright economic collapse. 🥶
/End
mtmalinen.substack.com/p/enter-the-pe…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tuomas Malinen

Tuomas Malinen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mtmalinen

May 2
Europe stands at the verge of a catastrophe.

When @POTUS took power, there were hope that he would A) restore the relationship between two nuclear powers and B) understand the actions leading to the Russo-Ukraine conflict, defusing them.

This hope has now (almost) failed. 🧵1/ Image
President Trump started with a correct note by re-establishing connections with Moscow. He also put President Zelensky in the "presser" with @VP .

However, he seems to have used his position only to establish the mineral deal with Ukraine. This can be seen as a grave mistake because it 1) alienates Moscow and 2) ties the U.S. into the conflict.
2/Image
The problem it creates is that the deal yields to 'vested interest' for the U.S. in Ukraine. How can President Trump now act as a neutral party in a deeply entrenched conflict between Ukraine and Russia?

He cannot.

Naturally, he can (and will) try, but he has effectively pushed Moscow into the corner. What options do the Russian leadership now have?
3/
Read 12 tweets
Feb 11
I hope @POTUS understands this. There will be no peace in the European continent as long as your bases are here.

There's no threat of a Soviet Union anymore. We've dealt with Russia for centuries without the U.S. "support". Those times were rather violent, but that was mostly because actions of western and central European states, not because of Russia.

The U.S. essentially created the Russo-Ukrainian war, leading to the slow economic demise of Europe. This is something the Deep State has been planning since, at least 1997.

I've explained this thoroughly in my piece detailing the history of NATO vs. Russia, which main points I will summarize here.
🧵1/9
What follows is a quote from Dr. Zbigniew Brzezinski. He was a Polish-born political scientist, who served as a counselor to President Lyndon B. Johnson from 1966 to 1968 and as a National Security Advisor for President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981.

He was probably the most influential political scholar in the U.S., known for his very hawkish stance towards Russia and China, and as a major proponent of NATO enlargement.
2/
It follows that a wider Europe and an enlarged NATO will serve well both the short-term and the longer-term goals of U.S. policy.

A larger Europe will expand the range of American influence-- and, through the admission of new Central European members, also increase in the European councils the number of states with a pro-American proclivity-- without simultaneously creating a Europe politically so integrated that it could soon challenge the United States on geopolitical matters of high importance to America elsewhere, particularly in the Middle East.

This was, most likely, the plan with Ukraine. To make sure that the Eurasian alliance between China, Europe and Russia fails.
3/
Read 11 tweets
Jan 11
You think you know what happened during the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-2008?

The road to the GFC is long and complex. In its heart lies an innocent innovation to manage risks better, until authorities messed everything up.

The road to an (epic) financial crash. 🧵
Basically since the birth of banking, banks have been in the forefront of risk distribution through diversification and hedging. In the US, banks started to sell mortgage-backed debt obligations to investors already in the 1960s.

The idea was to distribute risk outside the balance sheet of banks, which would make more funds available for bank lending.
2/
In the late 1970s, Salomon Brothers and Bank of America Corporation started to securitize the mortgages by pooling together their interest payments and selling investors tranches based on their riskiness. The tranches became known as: junior, mezzanine and senior.

Junior was the most-risky one, but it also received the highest payments. Senior tranche was thought to be very safe. If there would be defaults on mortgages, all the other tranches would be wiped out before senior, effectively implying a collapse of the housing market.

Lewis Ranieri was a central figure in opening up the markets for mortgage-backed securities. 3/Image
Read 18 tweets
Dec 29, 2024
The level of war-propaganda in Finland is massive.

@iltalehti_fi speculates that Russia is planning to restore the 1743 borders established in Treaty of Åbo to create a "buffer-zone". Russia would also strike Helsinki with missiles.

And there's much more. 1/13🧵 Image
Just six months ago, our government-funded (propaganda) channel @yleuutiset notified that Russian military bases near Finland are nearly empty.

I guess Russia plans to attack Finland "with shovels".
2/ Image
Continuing on the first note, @iltasanomat (our second largest daily newspaper) has just published a lengthy article (for subscribers only) on where Finns should evacuate in the case of a war.

Preparation is required "because of Russia". We did not have this "problem" before.
3/ Image
Read 14 tweets
Dec 18, 2024
Russia and Israel are treated totally differently in spite of the fact that both are waging wars of invasion. The major difference is that while Russia is engaged in an existential war, Israel is waging a war of expansion.

Thread on Russia vs. Israel. 🧵1/12 Image
For an untrained eye, it may appear that the motivation behind both wars, in Ukraine and the Middle East (Gaza/Lebanon/Syria), would be the same: threat.

The difference is in the level of threat experienced.
2/
The start of the second phase of the Ukrainian military conflict in February 2022 was presented to us as an over-reaction by Kremlin. The invasion was painted as an un-provoked attack of Russia to a friendly neighbor.

In reality NATO had fought a war of provocation towards Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union in early 1990s. 3/
Read 12 tweets
Nov 10, 2024
A friend asked me sometime ago, how do I always attract women everyone wants to f*ck. The simple answer: just be a fucking man.

Your looks and content of your wallet are irrelevant to non-toxic classy women, which you want into your life. But, you need to be brutally picky.
1/ Image
Even in the deepest depths of my depression in my teenage years, I did not settle. I knew what I wanted. Never settle. ☝️

This means that you need to spend extended perios of time alone, because top-class women do not want a womanizer either. Be comfortable in your own skin.
2/
Classy women want someone they can trust. Like the blonde in the picture told me some time ago, "your woman needs to understand that there's always interested women around, but that I always come home after the evening".

Your word is the only thing you got. Protect it.
3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(