USA is the worlds superpower not only because of its technology and wealth, but also due to its forced democracy military campaigns all over the world.
US gets to decide who gets democracy and who doesn’t depending on their available resources like oil, gold, minerals etc. a 🧵
International arms dealer Victor Bout has given his first interview after being released from US custody #MerchantOfDeath
Julian Assange lost the fight
Edward Snowden lost the fight
They lost the fight bringing out the truth about the misdeeds of your government. If it was about any other entity like an NGO, charity or a corporation it’d have killed it. #FreeAssange#FreeSnowden
This is war funding for waging a proxy war with Russia on taxpayer dime without approval from US taxpayers of course #MilitaryIndustrialComplex
Spending 100x for taking down Russian drones is aweful ROI for war but who cares about taxpayers right
2008 - Iraqi journalist Muntadhar al-Zaidi threw his shoes at war criminal G.W. Bush who illegally invaded Iraq and slaughtered over a million Iraqis based on WMDs lies.
Israel 🇮🇱 is a bully & a war monger. USA and EU support Israel under all circumstances. Palestine 🇵🇸 is slowly erased from the world map one child at a time, one family at a time, one home at a time, one street at a time, one community at a time
If you are born in Palestine, your age is irrelevant: a child of 6, 8, or 11 years old is harassed, humiliated and persecuted as adults are.
Israel 🇮🇱 is a war monger
USA 🇺🇸 is a war monger supporter
EU is also a war monger supporter
NATO doesn’t really want peace
USA doesn’t really want peace
Allies don’t really want peace
EU doesn’t really want peace
EU, USA & NATO have brought death and devastation to Afghanistan, Iraq, Nicaragua, Palestine, Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and Bahrain. You've backed a coup in Ukraine & assisted fascist groups that sought to crush Russian speaking citizens 🤷♂️
USA & NATO presses a button here and real lives are destroyed across the world 🛑 🛑 🛑
USA & NATO destroyed lives in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, North Korea, Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, Kuwait, Congo, Cambodia, Bosnia, Somalia, Grenada and others
Mr. President… how about not starting these wars in the first place. You’re still funding the NATO proxy war in Ukraine, you’re funding the Yemen genocide and you’re supporting the Palestine land grab.
ITS LIKE YOU’RE STARTING FIRE IN A BURN PIT & TREATING THE WOUNDS
Why do we still keep funding wars
Its almost as if they never want peace & happiness, they want endless wars
Zelensky’s wife spending 40,000 Euros in Paris on a single shopping trip while asking for more… whoever’s funding Ukraine war is a sucker
- EU is a sucker
- USA is a sucker
- NATO is a sucker
USA tried but failed for 20 years
How you put an end to wars, put your politicians on the frontlines
If Ukraine 🇺🇦 is the #1 priority for USA then you know who’s interest are they serving. They never want the war to end, they want an endless war with endless profits for themselves and their weapons manufacturers.
The acronym "DOGE" "Democrats Officially Getting Exposed." It is used to imply that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the administration of President Donald Trump, is revealing or exposing alleged inefficiencies, fraud, and corruption supposedly linked to Democratic policies or government operations they've been in charge of or supported.
🚩Fraudulent Activities Uncovered by DOGE:
1. Improper Payments at the Treasury Department:
- DOGE has claimed that payment approval officers at the Treasury Department were instructed to approve payments indiscriminately, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups.
2. USAID Operations:
- DOGE has been involved in the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), asserting that it is rife with fraud and waste. Specific claims include the agency funding projects like a DEI musical in Ireland and transgender opera in Colombia.
3. Access to Sensitive Government Systems:
- There are reports of DOGE gaining access to sensitive data, including Treasury payment systems, which could involve personal financial information of citizens.
4. Alleged Waste in Federal Spending:
- DOGE has announced savings, such as canceling over $1 billion in federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) contracts, suggesting these were wasteful or fraudulent expenditures.
5. General Claims of Fraud and Abuse:
- Broad assertions have been made by DOGE about uncovering "massive fraud, abuse, money laundering, and corruption" within government operations, though specifics beyond the above examples are less detailed in public reports.
The global financial system is extraordinarily sensitive to the pronouncements of the Federal Reserve's chief due to the pivotal role the U.S. dollar plays in international trade and finance. As the world's reserve currency, fluctuations in U.S. monetary policy directly influence global liquidity, interest rates, and economic stability. When the Fed chair speaks, whether it's about interest rate decisions, inflation targets, or economic outlooks, markets around the globe adjust in anticipation or reaction. Investors, from Wall Street to the smallest foreign exchange traders, scrutinize every word for hints of policy shifts that could affect asset valuations, currency strength, and investment strategies. This reliance stems from the understanding that changes in U.S. policy can ripple through economies worldwide, affecting everything from commodity prices to international borrowing costs.
This dependency is further amplified by the psychological impact of the Fed's statements. The markets operate on a blend of hard data and human emotion, where confidence or uncertainty can sway economic directions significantly. The Federal Reserve's chief, therefore, not only sets the tone for economic policy but also manages market psychology. A mere suggestion of tightening or easing monetary policy can lead to immediate market movements, as traders and investors adjust their portfolios to hedge against perceived risks or capitalize on new opportunities. This dynamic creates a self-fulfilling prophecy where the Fed's words can shape economic reality by influencing investor behavior, credit availability, and consumer confidence, often before any actual policy changes are enacted.
Moreover, the absence of a truly global monetary authority makes the Federal Reserve's chair one of the most influential figures in international finance. Other central banks and governments watch closely, often aligning their policies to mitigate or leverage the effects of U.S. monetary decisions. This isn't merely about following the dollar; it's about navigating the complex web of global economic interdependence where the U.S. economy, due to its size and influence, acts as a linchpin. The Fed's communication strategy, thus, becomes a critical tool not just for domestic policy but for global financial stability. This concentration of influence underscores a system where one person's words can dictate the financial health and economic direction of nations far beyond U.S. borders, highlighting our world's reliance on the Federal Reserve chief's rhetoric.
Here's why systems dominated by certain sectors might inherently fail to achieve broader societal goals:
🚩A Country Run by Banks Will Always Be in Debt:
- **Profit Over Stability:** Banks inherently aim to maximize profit, which often involves lending money and charging interest. This creates a cycle of perpetual debt for the state, as governments need to borrow to fund operations, infrastructure, and crises. The more debt there is, the more interest accumulates, ensuring that the debt never truly diminishes.
- **Economic Dependency:** By controlling financial policies, banks can dictate economic conditions that favor debt accumulation, like low interest rates that encourage borrowing or high inflation rates that devalue currency, increasing the nominal value of debt.
🚩Healthcare Run by Big Pharma Will Never Cure Disease:
- **Financial Incentives:** Curing diseases is less profitable than managing chronic conditions. Big Pharma benefits from long-term treatments where patients need continuous medication, rather than one-time cures which would eliminate future revenue from that ailment.
- **Research Focus:** The pharmaceutical industry's R&D is heavily influenced by potential market size and profitability rather than public health needs, often sidelining research into cures for less common or less profitable diseases.
- **Regulatory Influence:** Through lobbying, big pharma can influence regulations and drug approval processes to favor treatments that don't eradicate diseases but manage symptoms, thus ensuring sustained sales.
🚩A State Run by War Will Never Know Peace:
- **Perpetual Conflict:** Military-industrial complexes thrive on conflict. Wars justify defense budgets, contracts, and arms sales. Peace reduces these opportunities, hence there's an institutional bias towards maintaining some level of tension or conflict.
- **Political Power:** Military leaders or regimes often gain and retain power through war, making peace less appealing as it might lead to a reduction in their control or influence.
- **Economic Dependency:** Economies can become dependent on war industries for jobs and innovation, creating a cycle where peace is economically destabilizing.
🚩A Nation Run by Media Will Never Know the Truth:
- **Profit from Sensationalism:** Media outlets often prioritize sensational, controversial, or divisive content to attract viewership, which can distort facts or omit context for the sake of engagement.
- **Control Over Information:** Media conglomerates can influence public opinion by controlling what information is disseminated, how it's framed, or even by suppressing stories that don't align with their interests or those of their sponsors.
- **Bias and Agenda Setting:** Whether through political alignment, ownership biases, or advertiser influence, media can skew narratives away from objective truth towards narratives that benefit their agendas or maintain viewer loyalty.
In each case, the systemic incentives and structures prioritize outcomes that align with the dominant institution's interests rather than the public good or societal well-being.
The issue of Muslim grooming gangs in Britain involves groups of men, primarily of Pakistani heritage, who were involved in the systematic sexual exploitation of young, mostly white, girls. These crimes took place over several decades, particularly highlighted in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford.
**Nature of the Crimes:**
These gangs would typically target vulnerable young girls, often from disadvantaged backgrounds, using methods such as providing gifts, alcohol, or drugs to manipulate and control them. The abuse included rape, trafficking, and other forms of sexual exploitation, often occurring in a group setting where girls were passed among multiple men for abuse.
**Scale of Impact:**
While exact numbers are difficult to ascertain due to the scale and historical nature of these crimes, various reports suggest:
- In Rotherham alone, an independent inquiry estimated around 1,400 children were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. However, some sources suggest that the total number of victims across the UK could reach into the tens of thousands over the span of decades.
- In Telford, one investigation suggested that over 1,000 girls could have been affected over several decades.
**Cover-up Allegations:**
The allegations of cover-ups primarily involve:
- **Police**: Concerns have been raised that the police were reluctant to act due to fears of being perceived as racist or stirring up racial tensions. This hesitation led to insufficient action, with some victims' complaints being dismissed or not taken seriously. There were instances where police officers reportedly did not pursue leads or investigations because they were concerned about community relations or accusations of racial profiling.
- **Labour Party Politicians**: Critics argue that Labour politicians, particularly in areas with significant minority populations, were aware of these crimes but prioritized community cohesion and electoral considerations over addressing the abuse. There have been accusations that local councils, often led by Labour, downplayed or ignored the ethnic dimension of these crimes to avoid accusations of racism, thereby failing the victims.
- **Silence and Inaction**: The term "political correctness" has often been cited as a reason for the silence, where fear of backlash for highlighting the ethnicity of the perpetrators led to systemic failures. This included not only inaction but also in some cases, active suppression of information or downplaying the severity of the incidents.
**Public and Political Response:**
The issue has become politically charged, with debates over the extent to which ethnicity played a role in both the crimes and the cover-up. There has been criticism from various political quarters about the handling of these cases, with calls for more accountability, better policing strategies, and cultural changes within communities to address such issues.
The response from both police and political figures has evolved over time, with more recent commitments to tackle these issues head-on, including the establishment of task forces to investigate grooming gangs. However, the historical mishandling remains a point of contention and has been used in political discourse to critique the approach of past administrations and local governance.