USA is the worlds superpower not only because of its technology and wealth, but also due to its forced democracy military campaigns all over the world.
US gets to decide who gets democracy and who doesn’t depending on their available resources like oil, gold, minerals etc. a 🧵
International arms dealer Victor Bout has given his first interview after being released from US custody #MerchantOfDeath
Julian Assange lost the fight
Edward Snowden lost the fight
They lost the fight bringing out the truth about the misdeeds of your government. If it was about any other entity like an NGO, charity or a corporation it’d have killed it. #FreeAssange#FreeSnowden
This is war funding for waging a proxy war with Russia on taxpayer dime without approval from US taxpayers of course #MilitaryIndustrialComplex
Spending 100x for taking down Russian drones is aweful ROI for war but who cares about taxpayers right
2008 - Iraqi journalist Muntadhar al-Zaidi threw his shoes at war criminal G.W. Bush who illegally invaded Iraq and slaughtered over a million Iraqis based on WMDs lies.
Israel 🇮🇱 is a bully & a war monger. USA and EU support Israel under all circumstances. Palestine 🇵🇸 is slowly erased from the world map one child at a time, one family at a time, one home at a time, one street at a time, one community at a time
If you are born in Palestine, your age is irrelevant: a child of 6, 8, or 11 years old is harassed, humiliated and persecuted as adults are.
Israel 🇮🇱 is a war monger
USA 🇺🇸 is a war monger supporter
EU is also a war monger supporter
NATO doesn’t really want peace
USA doesn’t really want peace
Allies don’t really want peace
EU doesn’t really want peace
EU, USA & NATO have brought death and devastation to Afghanistan, Iraq, Nicaragua, Palestine, Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen and Bahrain. You've backed a coup in Ukraine & assisted fascist groups that sought to crush Russian speaking citizens 🤷♂️
USA & NATO presses a button here and real lives are destroyed across the world 🛑 🛑 🛑
USA & NATO destroyed lives in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, North Korea, Venezuela, Colombia, Panama, Kuwait, Congo, Cambodia, Bosnia, Somalia, Grenada and others
Mr. President… how about not starting these wars in the first place. You’re still funding the NATO proxy war in Ukraine, you’re funding the Yemen genocide and you’re supporting the Palestine land grab.
ITS LIKE YOU’RE STARTING FIRE IN A BURN PIT & TREATING THE WOUNDS
Why do we still keep funding wars
Its almost as if they never want peace & happiness, they want endless wars
Zelensky’s wife spending 40,000 Euros in Paris on a single shopping trip while asking for more… whoever’s funding Ukraine war is a sucker
- EU is a sucker
- USA is a sucker
- NATO is a sucker
USA tried but failed for 20 years
How you put an end to wars, put your politicians on the frontlines
If Ukraine 🇺🇦 is the #1 priority for USA then you know who’s interest are they serving. They never want the war to end, they want an endless war with endless profits for themselves and their weapons manufacturers.
Crime statistics stand as irrefutable pillars of truth, drawn from meticulously documented police reports, arrests, and victim surveys compiled by agencies like the FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics, offering a clear lens into societal realities without bias or agenda. For instance, data reveals that Black males aged 14-49, comprising just 3% of the U.S. population, are responsible for 43% of all murders, a stark disparity rooted in verifiable trends from 1980-2008 and echoed in more recent FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing Black offenders accounting for over 50% of homicides despite being 13% of the population. These numbers aren't fabricated; they're cross-verified through methods like the Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Crime Victimization Survey, exposing patterns that demand attention rather than denial, such as the overrepresentation in violent crimes that persists across decades and guides effective policy when embraced honestly.
Yet, governments and officials often undermine this objectivity by manipulating data or reshaping narratives to fit political ideologies, eroding public trust and hindering real solutions. Examples abound, from the Biden administration's claims of historic crime lows based on selective FBI stats later criticized as misleading, to investigations into D.C. police allegedly altering felony classifications to downplay crime rates, and New York PD's documented pressure on officers to underreport incidents for favorable optics. Such efforts, often driven by a reluctance to address uncomfortable racial disparities, only perpetuate cycles of violence by diverting focus from root causes like socioeconomic factors and urban decay, proving that twisting the truth serves no one and stalls progress toward safer communities.
A thread on three letter agencies and their subordination to political narratives👇
Lip reading, often portrayed in media as a foolproof method for deciphering spoken words from visual cues alone, falls far short of reliability when used as primary evidence in criminal cases. The human mouth produces visually similar movements for numerous words and sounds—consider how "pat," "bat," and "mat" appear nearly identical on the lips—leading to error rates that can exceed 50% even among trained professionals. Factors such as poor lighting, camera angles, facial obstructions like beards or masks, accents, or rapid speech further exacerbate inaccuracies, turning what might seem like clear footage into a guessing game. Studies from organizations like the National Deaf Children's Society highlight that lip reading is context-dependent and subjective, with interpreters potentially injecting unconscious bias or misinterpreting non-verbal cues, rendering it unsuitable as standalone proof of guilt in high-stakes legal proceedings.
In courtrooms, where evidence must meet rigorous standards of admissibility and scientific validity, relying on lip reading as the main pillar of a prosecution risks miscarriages of justice. Legal precedents, such as those in U.S. cases invoking the Daubert standard, emphasize that expert testimony must be based on testable, peer-reviewed methods with known error rates—criteria lip reading often fails to satisfy due to its interpretive nature and lack of standardization. Courts in the UK and elsewhere have similarly dismissed or heavily scrutinized lip reading evidence, noting its vulnerability to challenge and the potential for alternative explanations. Ultimately, elevating such a flawed technique to primary status undermines the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt," inviting appeals, wrongful convictions, and eroded public trust in the justice system; it should instead serve, at best, as corroborative support alongside more robust forensic or auditory evidence.
In the shadowed annals of empire, the invasion of Iraq revealed the blueprint: invent an existential threat, amplify it through every megaphone of power, then unleash hell under the banner of salvation. Weapons of mass destruction—those ghostly specters that never materialized—served as the perfect phantom, terrifying enough to silence dissent yet vague enough to evade accountability when the lie collapsed. The true prize was never aluminum tubes or yellowcake; it was the second-largest proven oil reserves on Earth, waiting to be liberated from a dictator and delivered into the hands of Western corporations. The war was sold as a moral crusade, but the receipts came later in the form of no-bid contracts and decades of guaranteed crude flowing through friendly pipelines.
Venezuela now stands in the crosshairs of the same script, only the boogeyman has been rebranded for a new century. Where once we feared mushroom clouds, we are now instructed to tremble before weapons of mass intoxication—tons of cocaine allegedly funneled through Caracas by a regime painted as the kingpin of global narco-terrorism. The opioid crisis ravaging American towns becomes the emotional battering ram, the humanitarian catastrophe of Venezuelan migrants the moral veneer, while the real objective glitters beneath the Orinoco Belt: the largest oil reserves on the planet, currently outside the grip of ExxonMobil and Chevron. The pattern is identical—demonize, destabilize, invade or install a compliant regime—only this time the pretext is not yellowcake but white powder, and the war will be waged not with tanks rolling across the desert but with sanctions, proxy forces, and perhaps, when the moment is ripe, a "limited intervention" to stop the drugs and secure the wells. History does not repeat; it simply changes costumes.