This is practical & based on lived experiences as a learner - training & as a lifelong learner; experiences as a teacher; feedback I've received & how I changed; some literature; & how I've tested some stuff experimentally mainly in #endoscopy
(caveat - not saying I'm excellent)
1. Safe learning environments
Man this is critical.
I'll use my consult rounds as an example. Everyone seated. I make sure schedule is cleared - nothing lingering. I don't lead - the senior-most house staff leads the rounds.
The environment should be fun and positive.
➡️No harsh words
➡️No making fun of anyone
➡️Questions will be asked and it's ok to not know the answers
➡️I admit when I don't know
➡️It's ok to use devices to look stuff up in rounds
➡️It's ok to question me
➡️+ feedback often with others
➡️- feedback small groups or in private
And respect for others who are not the same as you.
It's ok to screw up. And you shouldn't be crucified for it.
It's also why I like #simulation so much - it's easy to make the environment super safe.
Safe learning environments are foremost in #MedEd IMO.
2. Challenge learners appropriately
There is this education theory I love called #challengepointheory - learning is optimized when the difficulty of a task is matched in a sort of Goldilocks zone.
Too easy - they know it, not much gain
Too hard - then can't even tackle it
My mentor Jim Kitchens @UnityHealthTO demonstrated this once & it stuck w/ me. 3 learners - me (CC3); a bright R1 in IM & cardiology bound R3
Rounds on MR
He asked me to describe MR murmur (easy)
R1 - which gallop is likely in MR (harder)
R3 - what can an S4 mean in MR (hardest)
We apply this to endoscopy education
e.g. for our first-year boot camp - we start new learners on simple box simulators
then onto computer sims. Then add virtual patients, assistants, etc. Then real world.
Progression in challenge improves performance + clinical transfer
As adult learners, medical trainees thrive on challenge.
You'd be amazed what they can do when given an opportunity to tackle something complex.
3. Give learners autonomy
Entrust learners. Don't be afraid to let them figure out their ways of doing things as long as you are around to help.
Here's one time think I did it well when supervising my now colleague @jmosko29 on a case of massively bleeding rectal varices.
GI resident was @jmosko29 & my wife @nadabachi was surgery resident. 1st time they met
I knew they were smart cookies. I let them do their thing while I came in.
They had devised a way to inflate a Blakemore tube for rectal tamponade when I arrived to glue the varices.
Genius.
The @Royal_College in Canada has a "Competence by Design" framework based on some really sound theory on assessment
Learners are "entrusted" with tasks & assessed on entrustability.
Faculty should take this to heart. It's ok to let go.
It's the most important part of learning.
4. Be authentic
I've been listening to a lot of @naval lately and one of his mantras is that no one can outcompete you at being you. It holds for teachers as well.
The value you have as a teacher comes best when you teach authentically true to yourself.
I've even been introspective about it - making content, modes of delivery, even assessment schema that are true to me as educator, within my bailiwick.
About 15 yrs ago my friends @RToubassi@KashPrime &al took a trip for the 1st time and we were kind of amazed by seeing art.
We'd never really seen museums before and were fascinated by art - colours, shapes, knowing the artists and what they were experiencing.
It sort of seemed similar to endoscopic images - colours, and shapes that you had to decipher.
So I started doing rounds on art and endoscopy
I put them on every 6 mo or so to PGY1-3s who haven't seen much endoscopy.
It's fun - we go through paintings. I just ask about colours and shapes - and I tell them the little I learned about art.
Then we do endoscopy images & ask the same questions. And get great answers.
It's authentic to me. It's based on the stuff I like.
I get excited about it. I actually love giving these rounds.
Teachers - think about what makes you "you". Bring it into your #MedEd.
No one else can do it. It'll make you unstoppable.
5. Have fun.
Now you learn in any circumstance - so much learning in my life has taken place in tough/unpleasant situations.
But people gravitate toward fun things. When your rounds, seminars, small groups, sims, are enjoyable and fun - it's like a switch turns on in learners.
We joke, laugh, get to know each other, do fun things during teaching. We've made "serious" games.
And I think it's part of the package is being delivered.
Fun accentuates knowledge and skill acquisition.
And you can enjoy clinical medicine and education without being untrue to patient care.
There's a time and a place for everything - but it's definitely possible to remain empathic to difficult patient situations while teaching and remaining upbeat.
These would be the five highlights I would put forth to the #meded community when aspiring for excellence in clinical teaching.
I'd love comments and thoughts from educators, learners, and other stakeholders.
1. Modifying cognitive load
We use low fidelity simulators for basic skills (dial/button control, torque, stance, etc.) in a low risk envt. This allows the trainee to focus on basics without being overloaded by complex tasks - no patient, vital signs, assistants, sedation, etc.
2. Optimizing challenge points
We favor matching complexity of task being taught to the skill of learner. If task is too simple - there is nothing to learn. If the task is too complex, the trainee will struggle to learn anything.
1/n My friend and colleague @BilalMohammadMD tweeted recently about how to write personal letters for residency. This is my personal opinion. I note that I'm the PD for the Toronto GI program, which has a process described on the CaRMS website - applicants should follow that.
2/n This is with gastroenterology in mind. In general, the personal letter is the introduction I have to most candidates. I thoroughly read each one. Three things need to be addressed: (1) the reasons the candidate is applying to gastroenterology; (2) why the candidate thinks
3/n training with us will help them achieve their goals; and (3) what the candidate wants to highlight as the strengths of their application. This is a chance for a direct one-way conversation with the person evaluating the file to get the highlights immediately. Use it wisely.
(1/n) Today my colleague Dr. Norman Marcon, a giant in gastroenterology and endoscopy in Canada retired. This is a brief tweetorial about who he is, his career, and the contributions that he made to gastroenterology, and particularly endoscopic education.
(2/n) Dr. Marcon went to medical school at Queen's University @QueensUHealth and then began a rotating internship in 1964-1965 at @UofT_DoM in Toronto, where he was heavily inspired by Dr. Edward Prokipchuk (legacy.com/obituaries/the…), at the time new faculty in GI @UnityHealthTO.
(3/n). He followed with 2 y at Boston City Hospital @The_BMC, and then to @StMarksHospital under Prof John Lennard-Jones, along w/ Dr Christopher Williams www3.svls.se/sektioner/ga/G…. He was introduced to endoscopy from a short Machida colonoscope brought by Tetsuichiro Muto.