At the end of SL's economically hardest single year since probably the 1930s, thought I'd take a look back at the changes we've had and what factors I'm looking at for 2023.
2/ I'll limit the lookback so as not to repeat and focus on how I personally think of 2023. As always, all of this is just personal opinion, especially in context of the absolutely massive uncertainty we continue to be in.
3/ My biggest takeaway from 2022's economic journey is how much I see as achieved for the country. To be very clear, this is not a statement on the current administration, but on a view on change I see on the overall system.
4/ Despite a system geared towards and by corruption, despite bad actors at all stages, despite everything against Sri Lanka's people and its future, the fact that we have seen SOME improvement from the lows is really positive for me.
5/The fact that a lot of the worst mistakes have been turned around, that there is a realistic pathway towards things like SOE reform (just love reading Facebook comments on the CEB unions comments), and there might even be SOME (🤞) progress on land and labour reform?
6/ I think these are monumental first steps of progress.
However, they remain first steps alone so far. There's far more to be done IMO, both in terms of policy but crucially, in terms of rebuilding trust and confidence.
7/ For me, that's where we end the year - out of a terrible place, taking the first shaky steps to a better future.
But the fact remains that Sri Lanka's current economic situation isn't great. For me, rather than "stability", I like to think of it as "fragile consistency".
8/ That's where we move into 2023.
A year where everything that has happened in 2022 could either be undone or taken to an incredibly powerful launching pad for Sri Lanka's future.
9/ I think we all know that all the broad policy measures (though we may disagree on the specifics) that have already been taken are broadly necessary and need to be taken to completion without dragging or reversing. The question then, is on the rest.
10/ On the rest, I see 3 main risks in 2023. I'll get the pessimism out of the way first before ending up with the hope.
11/ The first risk is that the government doesn't go for a mutually agreeable give-and-take on reforms. What I mean by this, is that I feel the government must not only take "unpopular" measures but must also take "popular" measures as well.
12/ By this I mean things that show that the government is not only putting the pain onto the people but taking measures on themselves too.
These might not be so beneficial on the numbers directly, but there needs to be a lot more done on rebuilding trust in the system.
13/ This is a risk that is 100% within the control of the government.
Cutting Parliamentary and Cabinet privileges, showing credible steps towards expenditure management, setting up credible processes on anti-corruption are all critical steps I feel to rebuild confidence.
14/ Government must also IMO, take complex steps to improve the business environment - especially in the context of the country going through a harsh recession.
Yes, relief packages aren't possible in this fiscal env but regulatory reform could really soften the blow IMO.
15/ This is where cutting red tape, taking measures on land reform, having more reasonable labour regs including things like unemployment insurance etc could really make the cost that firms and people are currently paying, including with taxes, really worth it IMO.
16/ This is especially important in the context of the absolute fragility of the economy. The government really needs the goodwill of the people right now, in a context where the economy is still so fragile a whisper could send it crashing down again.
17/
The second risk is on the energy sector - an insanely convoluted mess we've gotten ourselves in. Too complex for this thread, will talk about it later.
The third risk is on global factors - we're in a tough global environment, again too complex for this thread, more later.
18/ But despite these risks, I still see hope for Sri Lanka.
Firstly, the fact is that most countries that have gotten into this sort of debt crisis has come out of it quite well. Slowly at first, but methodically, until 10 years later, they're in a much better place.
19/ Secondly, I do feel there's a groundswell of support for overall governance reforms as well.
It's clear in the more Colombo-centric crowd, but looking at how SLPP politicians (including those that are "in opposition") are treated on Facebook implies a shift in priorities.
20/ This may be temporary, but the fact that there is STILL so much "anti-Rajapaksa" sentiment, mostly centered around corruption, to me is quite hopeful that there will be at least SOME voters who vote on this in the future.
21/ Finally, I'm hopeful because of the resilience of the people.
Yes, many have left due to the lack of confidence they have in the country - but most of the country have stayed. Some for inability to leave, but enough because they believe in the future of the country still.
22/ We all know and believe that Sri Lankans are a resilient people, and we've heard it every time some crisis hits us.
But the fact that we've had to say that so many times, and we're still able to say it, proves to me that it's true - the people are resilient and bounce back
23/ Whatever pain and tragedy comes our way, I think this year has shown that many of us will stand strong and face the storm. It will be hard, we may often felt betrayed by our leaders, and our progress may be slow. No fight worth fighting is easy, after all.
24/ But we've looked ahead in the end.
That's what 2023 will be for me - a year we look ahead to a better future.
That future might not be immediate, but it will be there one day. Until then, we must then do all we can to get there. I'm confident that we eventually will.
2/ As always, personal opinion, but especially here, since this is speculative just a day in advance.
3/ Main point of the budget going to be both short term (2023) and long term (next few years) plan on reducing budget deficit. Both IMF driven but regardless, something SL needs to do.
Here's a hypothetical example to show the story of corruption and theft in Sri Lanka and why it's really painful to reverse it - for reasons that you might not realise!
2/ Let's assume some 20 years ago, in an election, a politician's crony friend donated some 100m LKR to an election campaign. In return, the crony wanted at least 200m LKR in profit a year in some way if the politician got elected.
3/ The politician gets elected. Now, he must help his crony friend.
Can he explicitly steal 200m and give every year? Nah, that's too easy to trace.
Instead, he creates an opportunity for the crony friend to earn that kind of money.
1/ These tax changes are sudden and unexpected, cause pain, and feel unfair for many. I'm going to try and make some sense of why this ended up so and what we can do about it.
2/ Personal views not reflecting anyone else. Twitter is also not a great place for this due to character limits - so this interview I did might be a better explanation.
3/ To start with - yes, these taxes are painful. There's no question about it. Yes, the pain will be different for different people - someone might have to cut down on a night of drinks with friends while someone else might struggle with debt.
1/ Corruption and tackling it is a key question, especially now that tax hikes have come in place. Noting down my thoughts on it and how we can move forward regarding the problem in my view.
2/ As always my personal view. This is how I see corruption in SL rather than any academic or "correct" way to see it (which doesn't exist obv). So discussion and questions welcome!
3/ I personally think of corruption as happening in one of 5 ways.
1. Outright theft and low-level bribes 2. Political expenses 3. Crony projects 4. Crony policies
1/ From a piece I wrote a few months ago but never got around to publishing. Vast majority of Sri Lankans have access to poor quality of life, and in a crisis, my view was that we should ideally focus on them. The piece is linked at the end.
2/ Of course, this is very much personal view and there are many flaws in this argument as its oversimplified a lot. But my hope was that this serves as a good basis to think and talk about inequality in Sri Lanka.
3/ The main idea is that concept of "middle class" or "lower class" or "upper class" is way too subjective and moral. Becomes very difficult to talk and make decisions based on it. Recent tax debate shows this as well.
With the new government finally expected to bring in an interim budget in August (fingers crossed), lets look at government expenditure, how high it really is, and what we can do about it.
Despite some belief that Sri Lanka has high expenditure levels, and we need to "cut down" on this - this is actually not the case.
Looking at the data shows that Sri Lanka actually has quite low government expenditure by global and regional standards.
(2/25)
If we look at a bunch of other countries that have similar debt related issues, this trend is even stronger - Sri Lanka's government expenditure is much lower than these other countries and in fact has been falling for a while