ChatGPT wrote a surprisingly (to me) coherent answer to a contracts exam prompt. 
I regenerated the response three times. This is the only one that discussed the reasonable expectations doctrine, though it wasn't particularly in-depth.
It would get a lot of "?" "why?" and "so?" responses from me because it doesn't explain why, for example, that the contract calls for "re-pav[ing]", sealcoating is excluded. It's mostly facts and conclusion.
As for R.E.D., it doesn't explain when this rule applies and whether those conditions are satisfied, given these facts.
When prompted specifically to discuss the R.E.D. and if it obligates Eddie to seal the parking lot, ChatGPT says it's a hard question. But the points on an (or at least my) exams are from discusses those hard issues.
At this stage, no #lawstudent hoping for an A should try this
At this stage, no #lawstudent hoping for an A should try this
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
