This is the story of how Belgium’s Leopold II colonised, exploited, murdered, enslaved and maimed the people of the Congo - and how Brussels’ dark past is catching up with it today.
Between 1885-1908, Belgium’s King Leopold II was responsible - directly or indirectly - for the deaths of 10-15mn people, in what’s today known as the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Belgium joined the Scramble for Africa in the late 1800’s. Leopold colonised the Congo while maintaining that it was a civilising mission to spread Christianity.
In reality, it was a way to get his hands on ivory and rubber and cash in on the profit. Leopold never visited the Congo but it was recognised as his private property at the Berlin Conference in 1885. Ironically, he wielded more power in the colony than in his own country.
His private army in the Congo maimed children, women and men. They raped women and set up camps of orphaned Congolese children to work or train as soldiers.
Maiming was used as punishment for not fulfilling production quotas and any form of dissent. Soldiers even began to use chopped-off limbs as currency.
The effects were disastrous as the focus on rubber meant no able-bodied men were left to hunt, fish and cultivate crops. Famine and disease spread. Millions died, trauma was widespread and the birth rate plummeted.
Human zoos with Congolese on display also started appearing in Belgium under Leopold's era.
Belgium’s wealth grew exponentially from the rubber trade. Congo suffered immensely and was only freed in 1960 with the rise of anti-colonial heroes like Patrice Lumumba.
More than 60 years later, protesters in Belgium vandalised, burnt and toppled statues of King Leopold. Yet Belgium still hasn’t apologised or paid reparations for the crimes it committed in the Congo.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
False narratives have blurred the history of slavery in the United States.
For example, despite his own words regarding his intentions, former US President Abraham Lincoln (1809-65) continues to be credited with freeing enslaved Africans and presented as a morally upright person with good intentions.
Here, we debunk some of these myths, starting with Lincoln being no abolitionist.
Many have claimed that the US Civil War was about states' rights, but this couldn’t be further from the truth! On the other hand, abolishing slavery wasn't the priority for the North.
The story has been that the US North (the union) was the moral side for not being involved in slavery. However, the reality is much different!
Our Facts of the Week look at some striking cases of false flag operations - carried out either by imperial powers or, as in the case of Rwanda, ultimately serving their interests.
These tactics have been deployed across the world, from Africa to Europe, the Middle East and beyond, either devastating nations directly or refining methods later used elsewhere.
Like other Western powers, the UK has been deeply involved in destabilising the DRC.
Our latest Facts of the Week unpack how British governments, corporations and intelligence agencies have consistently undermined Congolese sovereignty for profit and geopolitical interests - be it through colonial-era scheming or modern economic exploitation.
🧵
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a seemingly benign entity tasked with the noble-sounding mission of “advancing democracy” worldwide.
It was founded under the Reagan administration when the CIA was the capitalist bloc’s chief puppet master, orchestrating covert operations against governments that dared to defy the US.
The NED does openly what the CIA did secretly during the Cold War.
Libya gained independence from Italy on December 24, 1951, becoming the first country to do so through the United Nations. Yet many analysts argue that it only became genuinely sovereign on September 1 1969, when a group of Libyan Army officers under the leadership of Gaddafi launched a coup from Benghazi and quickly established control over the country. The coup was bloodless and received enthusiastic support from the public.
We look back at a figure who is controversial in the West but respected in many parts of the Global South, particularly in Africa. Putting aside the varying opinions, we objectively examine what Libya looked like before, during and after Nato-backed rebels toppled him in 2011. It brought to an end Gaddafi’s 42-year reign as president.
From 1915 to 1934, the United States occupied Haiti under the guise of ensuring stability and protecting it from European interference. However, according to the New York Times, evidence from decades of diplomatic correspondence, financial records and historical analysis reveals a more menacing driver behind the occupation: Wall Street! Specifically, National City Bank, now Citigroup, played a central role in pushing for US intervention in Haiti, driven by the desire to secure financial dominance over the Caribbean state to expand its business beyond US borders.
In 1914, a year before the invasion, National City Bank orchestrated the seizure of $500,000 in gold from Haiti’s treasury. This aggressive financial intervention destabilised Haiti's economy and laid the groundwork for US control. US Marines invaded Haiti seven months later, in 1915, but the occupation primarily served to protect and expand Wall Street's investments. National City Bank assumed control of Haiti’s central bank and redesigned Haiti’s financial system to benefit US economic interests.
The occupation reshaped Haiti’s economy, transforming it into a tool for Wall Street profiteering. Infrastructure projects during the occupation primarily served US business interests. The occupiers redirected export industries like sugar to benefit US corporations. Meanwhile, much of Haiti’s revenue was funnelled toward debt repayment to US banks, leaving little for national development.