Why would a BJP spokesperson come so vociferously to the defence of a particular small pharma company whose product MAY have been contaminated and thus implicated in these deaths in Gambia and Uzbekistan?
One reason COULD be that the company paid for protection. #electoralbonds
Testing fresh samples of cough meds cud be an irrelevance. Just because the samples tested by WHO labs in Gambia showed DEG contamination is not suff reason to expect these latest samples also to test positive.
Conversely,
If these latest tests by an Indian lab are negative then it does not necessarily mean that the original tests on the Gambia (and Uzbek) samples were wrong or flawed.
In other words:
A positive test for DEG contamination in the latest samples sent for testing by @CDSCO_INDIA_INF would be definitely INCULPATORY.
A negative test would NOT be exculpatory.
The reputational damage to India's record of safety and quality of product in the pharma sector is HUGE. The regulatory responsr should be swift, drastic, open, transparent and proportionate to the enormity of the effects of DEG as a contaminant.
Instead what we see is a wholly inappropriate and defensive approach that seeks first and foremost to deny the possibility even that these deaths COULD be as a result of contamination.
By presenting the WHO report from Gambia (and the latest Uzbek claims) of DEG contaminated cough syrup as an attack on India itself, the Indian regulatory authorities have been put in an impossible situation. I
If they take the tough regulatory action needed to clean up the process, they will be accused of siding with the 'foreign agents' out to do down India Inc. If they fail to act they will be letting down patients.
The trouble is that the Indian drug regulator's reputation for robust and INDEPENDENT enforcement of standards has long been suspect. See the Book #TruthPill by @d_s_thakur and @Preddy85. The present shambles makes it worse.
The NDTV debate shows that a large part of the problem has to do with the attitude of the BJP spokesperson in this debate. What has the issue of India's "swift response" to the Covid pandemic got to do with the issue of drug safety?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Earlier in August my top tweet was this:
and the cartoonist Satish Acharya (@satishacharya) was my top follower.
And in September, my top tweet was this:
Anf my top fpollower was Sumanth Raman, (@sumanthraman)
November 2022 saw the 6th anniversary of the Dreadful Distaster that was #DeMonetisation. I wrote this account of the evidence that it was a flawed move from the word go. newslaundry.com/2022/11/08/dem…
So what did I do in the year 2022?
In January, I must have been seriously worked up about the statementss coming from leaders exhorting citizens to fulfil their duties. "Citizens have rights, Governments and institutions have duties, I argued: newslaundry.com/2022/01/24/is-…
earlier that month a 2-word tweet with an embedded link was my top tweet for the month:
I have one and only 1 test of the worth and credibility of any economist / adviser who pontificates on India.
"Did you support #Demonetisation or did you call it out for what it was?"
That separates darbari economists who serve themselves from honest advisers who serve India.
The noisy battle of words over VD Savarkar is a distraction to cover up news that the Government does not like - news about the #Notebandi hearing in Supreme Court, #MorbiBridgeCollapse, the popularity of #BharatJodoYatra, the rising popularity for @RahulGandhi.
Indians are fast realising that they have been fooled since 2014, duped by false promises, taken in by massive Govt-organised scams, legislation that enslaves rather then liberates them.
#WhatsApp forwards don't fill empty bellies and stories of past #Vishwaguru glories do not make up for joblessness or loss of earnings. The people are waking up the fact that they have been divided and told to hate each other. #BharatJodoYatra threatens this cosy conspiracy
I predict the Supreme Court hearing on #DeMonetisation will go the usual way. The petitioners will present evidece of wrong doing. The Govt will state on oath that it acted lawfully and consulted everybody - @RBI, @FinMinIndia experts, No one can prove they didnt.
The Court will find for the Govt. "The petitioners failed to prove their case or disprove the Govt's claims. The Govt acted in good faith. The petitioners are habitual trouble makers who suffered loss due to #NoteBandi and are now seeking recompense. Case dismissed"
The best outcome the pertitioners can expect would be is their case was dismissed without costs being awarded against them or with a call for their arrest and persecution.
A 🧵on the role of @RBI in the lead up to #DeMonetisation of Nov 8, 2016
based on publicly available information. I am neither a sleuth nor an investigative journalist. All I can do is apply common sense to available information.
The Government submitted an affidavit to SC.
A 5 judge bench was hearing a batch of apeals against the Govt's act of invalidation the country's currency on 8 Niv 2016.
See for details this report in @ndtv
I have not seen the full affidavit. An affidavit BTW is sworn testimony. ndtv.com/india-news/dem…
We don't know who signed this affidavit. That's important. because if any part of it is untrue then he who signed it has committed perjury.
Anyway acc to news reports, the Govt had held "extensive consultation" with @RBI and "advance preparations" were made before #NoteBandi.