The truth was the data underlying these claims was never released for verification and any benefit was either short lived (healthy vaccinee effect) or due to miscategorisation bias.
In other words, fake news.
Yet people died as a result because they believed the reports.
The data later released by NSW health by vaccine status could not be manipulated any longer following analyses by people like @HaggleSearch and FOI requests.
So why did @jolyontheroad make false claims on behalf of the RACGP?
I encourage Jolyon to come forward. If you were asked to write the report, please provide more detail.
The report was one of a number mid-2021 that misrepresented benefits of the vaccine.
If you see similar reports showing "more ICU admissions in unvaccinated" or "more deaths in unvaccinated" from mid 2021 please archive them and post below. with tag #fakevaccinenews
And remember that unvaccinated patients were the only group recorded as dying without being hospitalised.
Given what we learnt over the last few days, is it possible that only unvaccinated elderly were denied the #3tablets needed to treat pneumonia?
The same "Australian guideline" which was coordinated by the MAGIC consortium (not Australian at all) that prohibited antibiotics in the treatment of #COVID pneumonia....
Ignore the Interferon in this RCT.
It doesn't matter.
What mattered was that China was using HCQ and antibiotics.
Their death rate per capita was the lowest in the world.
Impossible for a "novel" virus. metatron.substack.com/p/when-covid-c…
This is the paper. No deaths.
HCQ + Vitamin C + Azithromycin as "standard care"
This was standard care in Australia up to March 2020.
Then blocked by the
Then the deaths started. #3tablets
It doesn't take long to see why. The people who are against the @gbdeclaration always have links to fascist-communist entities. They might not even recognise it and talk about "human rights" while advocating lockdowns and forced medical treatments.
A middle author on this paper
The supervising author Xue Lan is Dean at Tsinghua University and Director of the CCP's National Expert Committee on Artificial Intelligence.
@deerbrian@richardhorton1 Before the trolls start... the above tweet is not even about Andrew Wakefield.
Wakefield was portrayed by the media as someone who committed fraud, but he did not. The charge was that he had not declared his legal work. Big deal...
Think about the fact that this paper was removed for "conflict of interest" when the only conflict was that the lead author was working with lawyers, which is normal practice. thelancet.com/journals/lance…