Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture
Jan 5, 2023 22 tweets 10 min read Read on X
1/Nothing strikes fear into the heart of a radiologist like the question,“Is it safe to do an MRI on this pt w/an implanted device?”

Never fear again! Here’s a #tweetorial on how to navigate implanted devices & #MRI
#medtwitter #meded #radtwitter #radres #neurotwitter #neurorad
2/MRI & CT are like nuclear & coal power, respectively. Everyone knows CT is worse for you & usually MRI is very safe & better for your body

But like nuclear power, when things go bad in MRI, they can go horribly wrong. Flying chairs into the magnet wrong. So, people are afraid
3/The trouble is from the magnetic attractive forces. There are 3 ways these attractions can wreak havoc. First is translation. Magnet literally pulls an object, like a chair, towards itself. This is the strongest attraction—like two lovers who literally can’t stay apart.
4/Second is torque or rotation. This is when the force isn’t strong enough to pull the object away, but enough to make it wiggle or turn a bit.

It’s like an attraction that isn’t enough to make you run, but enough to make you turn your head & look.
5/Last is the sneakiest way the magnet damages—heat. Radiofrequency (RF) waves deposit heat, like other waves, such as microwaves. This causes internal heating w/o any movement.

It’s like the hot passion you feel deep inside for your lover, regardless of any physical contact
6/All of these effects stem from the fact that the MR is just a giant magnet & its exerts forces on objects in the magnetic field.

Since these effects are from a magnet, it makes sense that metal objects would be the most affected—as metals can be magnetized.
7/But not all metals are affected the same by the magnetic field. We all know that metals like nickel & iron are very attracted to magnets, while other metals like calcium are not.

More affected objects will feel more force in the MRI & are more likely to move/cause damage.
8/We classify implants by how likely they’ll move in the MR field. MR unsafe devices are highly magnetic & could fly into the MRI & thus are banned. MR safe means no metal or magnetic properties, completely unaffected. MR conditional is in between, some attraction, but not strong
9/How do we know which metals are unsafe & which are possibly safe?

There are two main types of magnetic metals.

Ferromagnetic metals are very magnetic. I remember this b/c ferro sound like ferocious, & so they are ferociously magnetic.

These are MR unsafe.
10/Four main ferromagnetic metals exist: iron, nickel, cobalt, & steel. Remember this by remembering a dashing, some might say magnetic, Knight. He wears wrought IRON armor, holds a strong STEEL sword, & rides a bolting colt (COBALT). He’s a poor mercenary, so he’s paid w/NICKELs
11/While ferromagnetic metals are MR unsafe, their alloys are not. Adding other metals can counteract the magnetism or transform it into a completely new metal that isn’t magnetic.

Most medical devices are these alloys. You really only see true ferromagnetic metals in shrapnel
12/While ferromagnetic objects are strongly magnetic, paramagnetic objects are only weakly magnetic.

I remember this b/c they are PARamagnetic & PAR in golf means just average, nothing really special.

So there is no special or strong magnetism in these metals.
13/Paramagnetic objects are MR conditional. They have the potential to cause tissue damage by torque objects or heating objects. This risk must be weighed against the benefit of getting an MRI
14/Torque can be a problem.

However, if the device is in anything w/motion (vessel w/flowing blood, beating heart, moving bones), torque from physiologic motion is stronger than any from the magnet.

So if it stays in place w/natural forces, it won’t be moved by the magnet.
15/They say you should wait 6 weeks after any implanted device before scanning, to let scar tissue form to further anchor the device.

While this is ideal, it isn’t really necessary—b/c if the physiologic forces haven’t dislodged it yet, neither will the magnet.
16/But what if the paramagnetic device isn’t in a location where there is motion to test it? What if it’s in the kidney? Is it still safe? It probably is, b/c the magnetic forces are weak. Check the manufacturer recommendations to see how much magnetic force you can use & be safe
17/Paramagnetic objects can heat up. Even w/low magnetism, you get heating—& it’s hard to predict b/c the heat amount depends on the patient, scan parameters, etc

So every pt w/a device should get a squeezy ball to squeeze if they feel heating—to stop the scan before any damage
18/A special problem for heating is 1 dimensional (1D) wires.

These collect RF energy like an old TV antenna & concentrate the energy at their tip—leading to high risk of burns at the tip.

So any device with a 1D wire needs a special protocol to prevent overheating
19/RF pulses not only heat, they also can interfere w/electronics of devices—like jamming radio signals.

This can lead to device malfunction or even delivery of incorrect signals that can cause arrhythmias.

Special care must be taken & devices should be checked after scanning
20/As a result, scanning protocols for devices w/1D leads (pacers, DBS) are very strict & require oversight. Even then, there is hesitancy to scan 1D leads w/high risk of heating (abandoned leads, temporary leads)
21/So there are 4 questions to ask yourself to determine if an device is safe:

Is it:
(1) ferromagnetic?
(2) a 1D lead?
(3) a device w/vulnerable electronics?

If not, it usually safe to scan using the protocol recommended by the manufacturer.
22/The quick & dirty method: Is it a ferromagnetic knight? Is it an old TV w/electronics or antenna? If not, then scan carefully w/manufacturer’s recs.

Now you know the secret of safe MRI scanning w/implants. Hopefully this tweetorial has been a white knight to your rescue!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lea Alhilali, MD

Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @teachplaygrub

Jun 27
1/Blast from the past!

Sometimes to be next gen, you gotta to go old school!

Cutting edge pituitary imaging must be MRI, right?

Or can we go back to the future w/CT?

Here’s the latest in pituitary imaging in this month’s @theAJNR SCANtastic!

ajnr.org/content/45/6/7…
Image
2/Pituitary imaging is actually very difficult.

First challenge is the small size of the gland & even smaller adenomas, requiring high resolution.

And the difference between adenomas & the gland is subtle—both enhance, but adenomas enhance SLIGHTLY less Image
3/The difference in enhancement is transient & ends quickly

So pituitary imaging must be done dynamically to catch this small window of difference

So we have to do very high resolution imaging very quickly—the worst of both worlds! Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 21
1/”I LOVE spinal cord syndromes!” is a phrase that has NEVER, EVER been said by anyone.

Do you become paralyzed when you see cord signal abnormality?

Never fear—here is a thread on all the incomplete spinal cord syndromes to get you moving again! Image
2/Spinal cord anatomy can be complex.

On imaging, we can see the ant & post nerve roots.

We can also see the gray & white matter.

Hidden w/in the white matter, however, are numerous efferent & afferent tracts—enough to make your head spin. Image
3/Lucky for you, for the incomplete cord syndromes, all you need to know is gray matter & 3 main tracts

Anterolaterally, spinothalamic tract (pain & temp). Posteriorly, dorsal columns (vibration, proprioception, & light touch), & next to it, corticospinal tracts—providing motor Image
Read 20 tweets
Jun 19
1/”Tell me where it hurts.”

How back pain radiates can tell you where the lesion is—if you know where to look!

Remembering lumbar radicular pain distributions can be back breaking work--but here's a thread to help you! Image
2/Let’s start with L1.

L1 radiates to the groin.

I remember that b/c the number 1 is, well, um…phallic.

So the phallic number 1 radiates to the groin. Image
3/Let’s skip to L3 for a second.

I remember L3 is to the knee—easy, it rhymes! Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 10
1/Do you know all the aspects of, well, ASPECTS?

Many know the anterior circulation stroke system—but posterior circulation (pc) ASPECTS is often left behind

25% of infarcts are posterior circulation

Do you know pc-ASPECTS?!

Here’s a thread to help you remember pc-ASPECTS Image
2/Many know anterior circulation ASPECTS.

It uses a 10-point scoring system to semi-quantitation the amount of the MCA territory infarcted on non-contrast head CT

If you need a review: here’s my thread on ASPECTS:
Image
3/But it’s only useful for the anterior circulation.

Posterior circulation accounts for ~25% of infarcts

Even w/recanalization, many of these pts do poorly bc of the extent of already infarcted tissue

So there’s a need to quantitate the amount of infarcted tissue in these pts Image
Read 8 tweets
May 29
1/Waving the white flag when it comes to white matter anatomy?

Turns out white matter anatomy isn’t black & white!

This months @theAJNR SCANtastic is the white knight you need to rescue you!

Here’s the white matter anatomy you NEED to know!

ajnr.org/content/45/5/5…
Image
2/Gray matter or cortical functional anatomy is well known.

Everyone knows the motor & sensory strips. Most know Broca’s & Wernicke’s

But most forget that white matter has similar functional topography & just bc it’s white matter doesn’t mean it doesn’t have function! Image
3/But too often we don’t refer to this white matter functional anatomy.

Instead we use general terms like “corona radiata”

But that’s the equivalent of using the word “body.”

Just like the body has many different systems in it, so does the corona radiata! Image
Read 12 tweets
May 21
1/Having trouble remembering what you should look for in vascular dementia on imaging?

Almost everyone worked up for dementia has infarcts. Which ones are important?

Here’s a thread on the key findings in vascular dementia! Image
2/Vascular cognitive impairment, or its most serious form, vascular dementia, used to be called multi-infarct dementia.

It was thought dementia directly resulted from brain volume loss from infarcts, w/the thought that 50-100cc of infarcted related volume loss caused dementia Image
3/But that’s now outdated. We now know vascular dementia results from diverse pathologies that all share a common vascular origin.

It’s possible to lose little volume from infarct & still result in dementia.

So if infarcts are common—which contribute to vascular dementia? Image
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(