Victim's lawyer says they have not been provided a copy of the FIR yet.
Judge: You come with the complainant. Police are saying three four people are asking for it. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
PP: Matter has become so viral that why we are not giving this to anyone.
Judge: We will have his statement at the bar.
Judge: Why do you want PC?
PP: we need to interrogate a lot of people.
Judge: I understand he was not joining the investigation... now he has been arrested. But my question is why is PC required? What co-operation is required?
Judge: You are saying crew members are to be examined and etc. Why do you need him (Mishra) for this? Why can't he be sent to the judicial custody? #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Victim's lawyer: He has recanted his statement that he made before police?
Judge: That statement does not matter anyway under the evidence act.
Victim's lawyer: According to us the crew are also accused.
Judge: Just because public pressure ban gaya hai don't do this.
Adv Manu Sharma: Please see the FIR. Only one of the sections invoked is non-bailable. Rest of them are bailable. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Police demand that at least one day remand be given.
Judge: There is nothing at this stage that suggests I should send him to Police custody.
Order: Application is moved seeking three days PC remand.
Order: As per submissions of IO, the accused did not co-operate in the investigation. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Order: Prima facie, the material shows that the accused was deliberately avoiding joining the investigation.
Order: In the considered opinion of this court, physical presence if the accused is not required to interrogate other witnesses. Even 164 CrPC statement can be recorded without taking him into police custody.
Order: For reasons above, PC application is denied. He is remanded to 14 days judicial custody.
Mishra's lawyer moves his bail application. Court issues notice and lists it for hearing on January 11 at 2pm.
A Constitution Bench of the #SupremeCourt led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to hear petitions regarding the tussle between the AAP-led Delhi government vs the LG over control over services in the national capital.
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench led by CJI Chandrachud to hear pleas regarding the political crisis in Maharashtra arising out of the fall of the Uddhav Thackeray-led government.
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to hear batch of petitions regarding Sections 3(1)(a) and 6A of the Citizenship Act.
SG Mehta: AG is in court 2. We have proposed some issues. we have bifurcated the matters in 3 categories. #citizenship#nrc
SG Mehta: First concerns 6A of the citizenship act. Category 2 is the NRC issue where procedure, rules of NRC is challenged. Third category is the Foreigner tribunal issue. If category 1 can be taken up first, rest can be decided later by staggering