It drives me crazy when people say "there isn't some cabal working in a smoke-filled room to usher in the new world order."
That's because the technocrats are not hiding. They are openly talking about their plans to remake society by 2030. Things are going to get much worse. 🧵
Democracy is failing us.
Translation: We need technocratic totalitarianism because the stoopid rubes are too dumb to know what is best for them and the planet.
We are causing the problems in the world but we can solve the problems in the world.
Right on cue, misinformation has entered the list of global challenges for businesses; therefore, we need to shut down free speech.
Control the message to control the masses.
Technocracy... a system run by "experts" (corporations, NGOs, bureaucrats, academics and civil society.
Technocracy is totalitarian because the people no longer have a say. There is ZERO representation.
Technocrats must control all of the natural resources in order to control everything and everybody on earth. Enter climate change which was made up as a way to get people to unknowingly go along with global technocratic governance.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are the pillars for Chinese style global technocratic fascist totalitarian governance. #WEF#SDG
Dissatisfied with the short-term focus of government means people having the right to vote (democracy) is holding up our plans to remake society so we need global technocratic fascist totalitarian governance. #wef#technocracy
When technocrats say "sustainability", they don't mean a sustainable planet or climate. They mean sustainability as in "we need to keep the stoopid rubes in line so that we can sustain our lifestyles." #WEF#SDG
Stakeholder "capitalism" is public/private partnerships is fascism.
The technocrats are intentionally causing chaos as a just transition to global technocratic fascist totalitarian governance.
The technocrats are intentionally causing an energy crisis which will lead to mass famine and death. The technocrats do not care as they know this will not affect them. Do you honestly think they will give up flying, their big homes, etc.?
How are the technocratic fascists getting businesses to go along? They mandate that all companies that they do business with along the supply chain participate in ESG, decarbonization, etc. It's called "supply chain resilience".
A "resilient" workforce means employees that will go along with the transition to global technocratic governance. No diversity of thought is allowed.
Business is no longer about doing business. It's about ushering in global technocratic governance, aka sustainability.
Since everyone will be unemployed, lifelong learning will be mandatory as a way to keep people busy, and as a way to keep global citizens compliant and brainwashed.
Technocracy was created a century or so ago but technology finally caught up with the plan. Data is central for technocracy so everything and everybody will never know freedom from big brother again. Technocracy will eventually be governance run by AI.
The goal of progressive Democrats is to turn our country into a multiracial democracy, which is not compatible with our constitutional republic.
They are actively working to make white people a minority in all Western countries by 2030 or 2050, which is cited as part of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
That is why they moved heaven and earth to flood our country with illegal immigrants during the Biden administration—and now to keep them here during Trump 2.0.
If you are against what they are doing, you are of course labeled a white supremacist and an authoritarian.
Notice how one of the panelists received federal funds for her efforts during the Biden regime.
This is UCLA law school.
“Lawyering, Advocacy, and the Fight Against Authoritarianism Panel with Levy Fellow Vince Warren”
They view white Christians as an obstacle to obtaining their multiracial democracy so they need to be defeated.
In April 2022, Jim Thurber with American University asked pathological liar Adam Schiff if there are any consequences for lying.
You can’t make it up.
Jim mentioned the first impeachment.
That is the impeachment which, after Election Day, Norm Eisen admitted was about pre-bunking Joe Biden’s Ukraine corruption.
Adam Schiff was involved in creating the bogus impeachment along with Eric Ciaramella and Alexander Vindman—who is currently running for Congress in Florida instead of sitting in a courtroom due to our incompetent attorney general.
Adam Schiff literally read lies into the congressional record when he made up the conversation between Trump and Zelensky.
During a conference held in Cyprus about judicial independence, one of the panelists discussed “militant democracy,” the framework Democracy Inc. is using to defeat so-called populists around the world.
She said militant democracy means “saving democracy by limiting democracy.”
I’ve said it many times before but the two-tiered system of injustice exists in large part because we have judges who are ruling based on saving their democracy, not on the rule of law.
Steven Cash, a former CIA officer, discussed the origins of the Steady (deep) State. He said it was created the day Trump 1.0 won; it went dormant during the Biden regime and is now back in action (working against the will of the American people) as they view Trump as an existential threat.
The part I find most interesting is that he returned to work in intelligence during the Biden regime to focus on domestic issues within the United States.
The Steady State is a who’s who of the deep state.
Norm Eisen spoke about the steady state. He mentioned Miles Taylor (anonymous) who is now working with Norm to create a roadmap to prosecute Trump administration officials.
Princeton professor Stephen Macedo provides a retrospective on covid-era policies including the following:
1. He calls it the flu. I am old enough to remember when we were told that is a conspiracy theory.
2. There was decades of pandemic planning before Covid. The consensus was that school and workplace closures, restrictions on gathering sizes, mask mandates, social distancing measures, etc., were NOT effective and that the cost of doing so would be very high.
3. Measures NOT recommended by the WHO in their 2019 pandemic planning documents included contact tracing, quarantine of exposed individuals, entry/exit screenings, border closings, and school closures.
Johns Hopkins said essentially the same thing just months before Covid started and made the point that the overbearing measures might be used for political reasons. I’ve said it for years that Covid kicked off 2020 e!ection theft season.
4. In 2008, the ACLU said (in relation to Bush-era pandemic preparedness planning) that fear of diseases has justified abuses of state power, that coercion and brute force breeds pubic distrust, strategies that rely on voluntary participation do work as long as public health officials are working to help people not punish them, and that minorities bear the brunt of tough public safety measures.
The ACLU said noting during Covid which tells us something since they have been co-opted by Democracy Inc.
5. The professor made the point that they declared a war on Covid where dissent was not welcome, including from Jay Bhattacharya, the current director of the NIH.
6. The Covid measures that they put in place had no effect on mortality but they had a devastating impact on society and people especially related to young people and education. The measures also contributed to higher rates of crime, substance abuse, and depression, and had a negative impact on overall health.
7. He then mentions the origins of Covid. They all knew it came from the Wuhan lab but they lied about it which has led to the distrust in supposed experts and institutions. Covid had furin cleavage sites which are manmade. It did not come from a wet market or raccoon dogs.
After all of that, not one person has been held accountable.
“Democracy and Disagreement: COVID Policies in Retrospect”
Stanford
PCR tests were part of the Covid big lie and the virus was always going to be there so the lockdowns were for not.