• Contains a summary
• Contains a quotable (something I can directly drop into a piece of writing)
• Can contain figures
• Short & succinct
• Contains the PDF with key highlights
@obsdmd 4. Atomic bits of information go into COLLECTION NOTES
► Always add a link to the original paper (i.e. not the review you read it in)
► Quickly access the original source and catch up on it, even the PDF.
• Collection of atomic "facts" or "claims"
• Link to the original note - allows me to double check
• Very succinct short statements.
• Cites original source, not mention, even if I haven't read it yet. (e.g. "Hutchinson 1959 in Connell 1964")
@obsdmd 5. Questions and Ideas go into THINKING NOTES
► All (absurd) ideas, questions, suggestions go here.
► Birthplace of "synthesis" as multiple sources will naturally come together in these notes.
► Don't "think so much" here, creativity is spontaneous. Jot. Jot. Jot.
• Questions AND ideas
• Note simple questions, that will resolve by more reading
• Be critical and ask "what if..."
• Link Sources 1️⃣ and Collections 2️⃣ to start understanding.
@obsdmd 6. Gather Collections and Ideas to start an OUTLINE NOTE
► Use Collection facts as "lego stones" for writing
► Questions and Ideas are "writing prompts".
► Write Outline notes as you would publish in a journal
• Based on questions (3️⃣) and facts (2️⃣)
• Uses only primary sources (1️⃣)
• Aims at "publication grade", readable text
• References can be extracted automatically by Obsidian
@obsdmd This process is a RECIPE for academic writing. 🥘
The more often you "cook it", the easier and more effortless it becomes. 👨🍳
Practice, to be fast:
"Chop your knowledge up – cook it around a question – serve in an outline – repeat"
► 1 PDF = 1 SOURCE note (contains summaries)
► Facts from papers go as blocks into COLLECTION NOTES
► Fill THINKING NOTES with questions and ideas as you go
► Use collections and thinking notes to create OUTLINE NOTES
Every academic wants to find meaningful research gaps.
❌ Old way: Read 1000s of papers
✅ New way: A step-by-step, visual strategy
Here's my workflow using Obsidian, Litmaps, Consensus and DrawIO:
(and a webinar on how to do this!)
👇
1. Start with finding research questions
Sometimes there are papers dedicated to identifying them.
This will make your literature review process ENJOYABLE, as you won't follow ideas that are irrelevant (but inspire you personally).
Here are two examples:
2. Next find key papers on this topic.
One of the fastest and easiest ways to get started, is to use @ConsensusNLP GPT.
Find it in the GPT store or just use their website.
Here I just copy and pasted question 8 from the previous image.