The dictionary shows it's a word but also labels it as non-standard and incorrect in standard English.
Use either 'irrespective' or 'regardless.'
2. There is more than one way to write the possessive form of a word that ends in S.
Most academics are used to AP style, where the possessive of a word ending in S gets an apostrophe.
→ James' paper
But Chicago style recommends against that for clarity.
→ James's paper
3. The abbreviations 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' do not mean the same thing.
“e.g.” means "for example," and “i.e.” means "in other words" or "meaning."
“e.g.” → incomplete list of examples (no need to add 'etc.' at the end!)
“i.e.” → clarifying statement
4. Avoid run-on sentences.
Fusing together two complete sentences is not pretty.
It doesn't only happen in long sentences but can be as short as "I'm short he's a baller."
This happens when you don't use a semicolon, colon, or dash between two independent sentences.
5. Passive voice is terrible, but it is not always incorrect.
Generally, avoid passive voice.
But:
Passive voice can be the best choice if you don't know who is responsible for an action.
"Mistakes were made."
6. It's okay to split your infinitives.
Henry Alford, Dean of Canterbury, promoted the idea that you shouldn’t put an adverb in the middle of an infinitive
in his 1864 book:
The Queen’s English.
Not a rule, an idea.
For example: "To better understand" is common in academia.
7. You can end a sentence with a preposition.
Remove the preposition if the statement makes sense without it.
If the preposition is part of a phrasal verb or is necessary for a better style, keep it.
Example: "Let's kiss and make up."
TL;DR: Academic Writing
1. 'Irregardless' is a no-use word 2. S-ending possessives are stylistic. 3. 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' are not the same 4. Avoid run-on sentences 5. Passive voice is bad but not wrong 6. It's OK to split your infinitives 7. Prepositions can finish sentences.
If you found these tips helpful:
Close Twitter and start working on your next article. 🫶
But before you leave, please RT the tweet below and pay it forward.
Most researchers waste months on a systematic review
(when a rapid review would have been good enough.)
Two review types. Same question.
Completely different amount of work.
According to this paper, 14 literature review types exist.
If you get started, focus on 2 main types:
Run a systematic review when you’re shaping guidelines.
Use a rapid review when leadership wants an answer this quarter.
Systematic reviews:
• Multi-database + grey literature search, no date limits
• Typically used for guidelines or high-stakes decisions
• Dual screening + full critical appraisal, validated tools
• In-depth narrative synthesis to explain heterogeneity
• Detailed evidence tables, if possible, meta-analysis
• Formal, pre-registered protocol (e.g. PROSPERO)
Rapid reviews:
• Typically used for time-sensitive service (1–6 months)
• Output a short decision brief, slide deck, or summary
• High-level narrative summary with minimal detail
• Focused search (fewer databases, tighter limits)
• Single-reviewer screening with spot checks
• Streamlined or internal-only protocol