Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD Profile picture
Jan 22, 2023 10 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Most academic writing is awful at concision.

It's always:

• Verbose verbiage
• Prolix prose
• Jumbled jargon

Horrible to read.

Here's how top academic writers tweak their text. ↓
#AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #phdlife #phdvoice #phdstudent Hero image with text in front of yellow background (with pat
1. 'Irregardless' is a word, but don't use it.

The dictionary shows it's a word but also labels it as non-standard and incorrect in standard English.

Use either 'irrespective' or 'regardless.' This shows the dictionary definition of irregardless. Irrega
2. There is more than one way to write the possessive form of a word that ends in S.

Most academics are used to AP style, where the possessive of a word ending in S gets an apostrophe.

→ James' paper

But Chicago style recommends against that for clarity.

→ James's paper Two different styles of possessives ending in S from The Chi
3. The abbreviations 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' do not mean the same thing.

“e.g.” means "for example," and “i.e.” means "in other words" or "meaning."

“e.g.” → incomplete list of examples (no need to add 'etc.' at the end!)

“i.e.” → clarifying statement Example sentence: The interactive entertainment (i.e., games
4. Avoid run-on sentences.

Fusing together two complete sentences is not pretty.

It doesn't only happen in long sentences but can be as short as "I'm short he's a baller."

This happens when you don't use a semicolon, colon, or dash between two independent sentences. Run-on sentence example: I wish I was a little bit taller I
5. Passive voice is terrible, but it is not always incorrect.

Generally, avoid passive voice.

But:

Passive voice can be the best choice if you don't know who is responsible for an action.

"Mistakes were made." Example showing: "Mistakes were made" in front of
6. It's okay to split your infinitives.

Henry Alford, Dean of Canterbury, promoted the idea that you shouldn’t put an adverb in the middle of an infinitive
in his 1864 book:

The Queen’s English.

Not a rule, an idea.

For example: "To better understand" is common in academia. Star Trek reference image: An image of the starship Enterpri
7. You can end a sentence with a preposition.

Remove the preposition if the statement makes sense without it.

If the preposition is part of a phrasal verb or is necessary for a better style, keep it.

Example: "Let's kiss and make up." An example of a sentence ending with a preposition in front
TL;DR: Academic Writing

1. 'Irregardless' is a no-use word
2. S-ending possessives are stylistic.
3. 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' are not the same
4. Avoid run-on sentences
5. Passive voice is bad but not wrong
6. It's OK to split your infinitives
7. Prepositions can finish sentences.
If you found these tips helpful:

Close Twitter and start working on your next article. 🫶

But before you leave, please RT the tweet below and pay it forward.

Best of luck to you!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD

Prof Lennart Nacke, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @acagamic

May 14
How I craft compelling research stories that editors love

The ultimate guide to creating a persuasive research narrative: Narrative paper flow structure.
1. Identify a critical problem

Be targeted.
Be focused.
Be specific.

Show a significant challenge in your field.
2. Establish the problem's significance

Explain why this issue matters.
Discuss the consequences.
Emphasize its implications.

Provide a rationale for your audience.
Read 11 tweets
May 13
I've been advised to avoid the phrase:

"No previous studies have investigated..."

It's a cheap hook to claim the value of your study.

Here are 5 approaches I use in my writing instead:
1. Emphasize the research novelty

Don't focus on the absence of previous research.
Claim the originality of your proposed research.

Example:
"This study proposes a unique approach to [topic] building on [X] theories. We introduce a new methodology to address [specific gaps]."
2. Acknowledge existing research & identify gaps

Emphasize studies have addressed the topic.
But focus on limitations in existing knowledge.

Example:
"While previous studies have explored X and Y, they have primarily focused on [aspect Z] and not adequately addressed [gaps]."
Read 9 tweets
May 9
Focusing ONLY on the research is a recipe for publication failure.

How I stay prolific as an author
(even when the first draft feels impossible).

7 essential habits of successful academic authors Mindmap of 7 essential publication habits
1. Define your research's impact

How does this research affect my community?
What's my pitch for this?
Is my study original?

Knowing the contribution is vital.

1. Clarify novelty
2. Craft summary
3. Ensure relevance to scientific discourse

Explain why your research matters.
2. Identify target journals

Are there journal preferences among the authors?
Match the study to the right publication.

1. Align with journal scope.
2. Consider the audience.
3. Evaluate the impact factor.

Picking the right journal is crucial for reaching the right audience.
Read 10 tweets
May 7
Ace your lit review with this one insight:

Never summarize previous research without critical analysis

Steal my blueprint for a better literature review: Mind map of the 5 tips to avoid just summarizing previous research in your literature review.
1. Identify patterns and themes

Find divergences across studies.
And search for commonalities.
Synthesize findings.

Reveal overarching trends and debates.
2. Evaluate methodological strengths and limitations

Highlight methodological issues.
Assess the rigour of essential studies.
Check internal, external, construct validity.

Show what impacts the reliability of findings.
Read 7 tweets
May 5
I want to read clear, concise, compelling papers.

The secret way to produce them is revision.

7 revision tips to go from messy draft to polished paper:
1. Work section by section

Focus on one part of the paper at a time.
Save the introduction and conclusion for last.
Tackle the whole only when the parts are solid.

Focus on completing one section at a time.
2. Outline to identify issues

Summarize each paragraph in a single sentence.
It's easier to spot gaps in your narrative flow.
Inconsistencies will stand out.

Refine the structure first before polishing the prose.
Read 10 tweets
May 4
I believed these 11 lies about literature reviews until I knew better

Don't let these myths hold you back.

The honest truth about literature reviews
🗣️ "A literature review is just a summary of sources"

Nope.

✅ It's a critical analysis that synthesizes ideas and identifies gaps.

Summarize, synthesize, scrutinize.
🗣️ "You must read every paper in full"

Nope.

✅ Strategically skim and prioritize based on relevance and quality.

Be selective.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(