The dictionary shows it's a word but also labels it as non-standard and incorrect in standard English.
Use either 'irrespective' or 'regardless.'
2. There is more than one way to write the possessive form of a word that ends in S.
Most academics are used to AP style, where the possessive of a word ending in S gets an apostrophe.
→ James' paper
But Chicago style recommends against that for clarity.
→ James's paper
3. The abbreviations 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' do not mean the same thing.
“e.g.” means "for example," and “i.e.” means "in other words" or "meaning."
“e.g.” → incomplete list of examples (no need to add 'etc.' at the end!)
“i.e.” → clarifying statement
4. Avoid run-on sentences.
Fusing together two complete sentences is not pretty.
It doesn't only happen in long sentences but can be as short as "I'm short he's a baller."
This happens when you don't use a semicolon, colon, or dash between two independent sentences.
5. Passive voice is terrible, but it is not always incorrect.
Generally, avoid passive voice.
But:
Passive voice can be the best choice if you don't know who is responsible for an action.
"Mistakes were made."
6. It's okay to split your infinitives.
Henry Alford, Dean of Canterbury, promoted the idea that you shouldn’t put an adverb in the middle of an infinitive
in his 1864 book:
The Queen’s English.
Not a rule, an idea.
For example: "To better understand" is common in academia.
7. You can end a sentence with a preposition.
Remove the preposition if the statement makes sense without it.
If the preposition is part of a phrasal verb or is necessary for a better style, keep it.
Example: "Let's kiss and make up."
TL;DR: Academic Writing
1. 'Irregardless' is a no-use word 2. S-ending possessives are stylistic. 3. 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' are not the same 4. Avoid run-on sentences 5. Passive voice is bad but not wrong 6. It's OK to split your infinitives 7. Prepositions can finish sentences.
If you found these tips helpful:
Close Twitter and start working on your next article. 🫶
But before you leave, please RT the tweet below and pay it forward.
Chat PDF in Paperpal just changed how I read research papers.
Just uploaded a systematic review paper and my jaw dropped.
Here's what happened:
1. Instant paper breakdown
• Title, authors, DOI extracted automatically
• Smart summary generated in seconds
• Key sections identified and linked
• Research questions pulled out precisely
2. Smart paper connections
• Found relevant papers I hadn't discovered
• Connected papers across different fields
• Added them to my library with one click
• Surfaced hidden relationships
But the real magic? The built-in question engine.
Instead of scrolling endlessly, I clicked "Provide a summary of the discussion section" and got 6 key points with direct links to my source text.
Want to try something powerful?
Upload your PDF and ask:
• "What are the main findings?"
• "Describe the methodology"
• "List the research questions"
It finds answers instantly, with links to the exact paper sections to double-check.
Most researchers make a critical mistake in their methods section that instantly signals 'amateur' to reviewers. It's so common that I see it in 7 out of 10 papers, yet so simple to fix...
Delay writing your Methods section.
Spend time owning your research process first:
By answering 4 questions:
• What problem did you solve?
• For whom did you solve it?
• Why did this problem need solving?
• How did you solve it effectively?
Get comfortable thinking through each:
Think through your research design
Think through your ethical choices
Think through your data collection
Think through your analysis steps
Think through your limitations
Write down specific answers for each.
And if you have unclear answers:
→ Take time to better understand
Then, write Methods section in 8 steps:
(with the information needed in it)
1. Start with your "why"
Remind readers briefly what problem you solved
Link your methods directly to your research question
(No one cares about methods without context)
2. Pick your approach
Choose qualitative, quantitative, or mixed
Match it to your research goals
Clarify why THIS approach
3. Decode unusual methods
Got a unique approach? Explain it
Defend why you picked it
Show how it beats traditional options
Every groundbreaking discovery in science started with someone willing to challenge their own assumptions. Your next literature review could be the one that changes everything.
Your academic work needs to fight confirmation bias.
It's blocking you from great research.
And it's easier to fix than you think.
Here's how to destroy confirmation bias in your research:
1. Plan before you search
→ Write your research questions
→ Define inclusion criteria
→ List your search terms
→ Pick your databases
2. Document everything
→ All search strings used
→ Every database checked
→ Number of results found
→ Selection decisions made
3. Remove author identity
→ Code your studies
→ Hide author names
→ Mask institutions
→ Review methods first