The dictionary shows it's a word but also labels it as non-standard and incorrect in standard English.
Use either 'irrespective' or 'regardless.'
2. There is more than one way to write the possessive form of a word that ends in S.
Most academics are used to AP style, where the possessive of a word ending in S gets an apostrophe.
→ James' paper
But Chicago style recommends against that for clarity.
→ James's paper
3. The abbreviations 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' do not mean the same thing.
“e.g.” means "for example," and “i.e.” means "in other words" or "meaning."
“e.g.” → incomplete list of examples (no need to add 'etc.' at the end!)
“i.e.” → clarifying statement
4. Avoid run-on sentences.
Fusing together two complete sentences is not pretty.
It doesn't only happen in long sentences but can be as short as "I'm short he's a baller."
This happens when you don't use a semicolon, colon, or dash between two independent sentences.
5. Passive voice is terrible, but it is not always incorrect.
Generally, avoid passive voice.
But:
Passive voice can be the best choice if you don't know who is responsible for an action.
"Mistakes were made."
6. It's okay to split your infinitives.
Henry Alford, Dean of Canterbury, promoted the idea that you shouldn’t put an adverb in the middle of an infinitive
in his 1864 book:
The Queen’s English.
Not a rule, an idea.
For example: "To better understand" is common in academia.
7. You can end a sentence with a preposition.
Remove the preposition if the statement makes sense without it.
If the preposition is part of a phrasal verb or is necessary for a better style, keep it.
Example: "Let's kiss and make up."
TL;DR: Academic Writing
1. 'Irregardless' is a no-use word 2. S-ending possessives are stylistic. 3. 'i.e.' and 'e.g.' are not the same 4. Avoid run-on sentences 5. Passive voice is bad but not wrong 6. It's OK to split your infinitives 7. Prepositions can finish sentences.
If you found these tips helpful:
Close Twitter and start working on your next article. 🫶
But before you leave, please RT the tweet below and pay it forward.
Here's the perfect formula to write a literature review paragraph.
A great literature review paragraph needs exactly 2 components.
Most students think every paper needs its own paragraph.
Completely off the mark.
The secret?
Combine synthesis + evaluation:
• Find papers with similar findings
• Group them under one theme
• Connect everything together
• Add critique for each study
Example:
Bad:
"Smith (2020) studied caffeine. Jones (2021) also studied caffeine."
Good:
"Studies show caffeine boosts performance in endurance athletes (Smith, 2020; Jones, 2021), though dosage timing remains debated. While Smith found pre-workout intake optimal, Jones demonstrated mid-workout consumption produced stronger results in elite runners."
See the difference?
One uses contrasting to tell a story.
One just glances over the studies.
A systematic review requires exhaustive, comprehensive searching with quality assessment criteria, while a rapid review can be completed with time-limited formal quality assessment. The difference is months of work.
According to this paper, 14 literature review types exist.
→ You need thorough certainty
→ Time isn't the main factor
→ Quality is everything
Pick rapid when:
→ You need quick insights
→ Time drives decisions
→ Good enough works
Don't overcomplicate this.
Your timeline decides.
Source: Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Which review type fits your project?
Join 6,913+ researchers if you like snack-sized research tips like this: go.lennartnacke.com/newsletter
Chat PDF in Paperpal just changed how I read research papers.
Just uploaded a systematic review paper and my jaw dropped.
Here's what happened:
1. Instant paper breakdown
• Title, authors, DOI extracted automatically
• Smart summary generated in seconds
• Key sections identified and linked
• Research questions pulled out precisely
2. Smart paper connections
• Found relevant papers I hadn't discovered
• Connected papers across different fields
• Added them to my library with one click
• Surfaced hidden relationships
But the real magic? The built-in question engine.
Instead of scrolling endlessly, I clicked "Provide a summary of the discussion section" and got 6 key points with direct links to my source text.
Want to try something powerful?
Upload your PDF and ask:
• "What are the main findings?"
• "Describe the methodology"
• "List the research questions"
It finds answers instantly, with links to the exact paper sections to double-check.