Image: Richard Dighton, @britishmuseum (BM), 1852,1116.559
Between roughly 1818-1828, Richard Dighton did a series of profile portraits of men in Regency London's high society. Most were etchings, and the BM has digitized many prints held in its collection--they are worth your time if you're interested in Regency society, style, and art.
The earlier prints of this particular portrait, published individually by Dighton himself, are clearly dated to July 1821. Copies show up in the collections of the @britishmuseum, @NPGLondon, and @RCT.
(details shown here are from prints in the BM and RCT collections)
Here's where things get confusing. Around 1824/5, Dighton likely sold the plates for a large number of these portraits to Thomas McLean, who re-printed them in 2 grouped collections, adding text indicating the subjects. This etching was titled 'A View of Londonderry.' (Image: BM)
When McLean re-printed the Dighton portraits in 1825, Charles Vane-Stewart was the 3rd Marquess of Londonderry. Charles was, of course, the younger half-brother of Robert Stewart, known popularly as #ViscountCastlereagh, who had died in August 1822.
This connection between McLean's re-printing of the portraits in 1825 and the fact that Charles was the Marquess of Londonderry at that time led to the identification of the subject of the Dighton portrait as Charles, 3rd Marquess of Londonderry.
Both Henry Hake's 1926 catalogue of Dighton caricatures and Dorothy George's 1952 catalogue of satirical prints in the BM collection identify the Dighton portrait with Charles, and Hake's and George's works set the tone for the BM's own collection records.
However, if we return to the original date of Dighton's portrait, July 1821 (which both Hake and George accept), the story isn't that simple. Between April 1821 and his death in August 1822, Robert Stewart (formerly Viscount Castlereagh) was the 2nd Marquess of Londonderry.
In fact, some prints of Dighton's portrait are titled 'A Late Foreign Secretary' in clear reference to Robert who had died in 1822 while he was Foreign Secretary. The print below is in the @NPGLondon collection (NPG D20569) and includes this title.
It gets more interesting when we consider that Dighton based these profile portraits on his observation of the subjects as they walked the streets of London--posture, gait, attitude, clothing, etc.
Here's the thing: Charles wasn't in London in July 1821.
He was still in Vienna as the British Ambassador, a role he had held since 1814. Charles was in London briefly in Fall 1820 and returned in August 1821 for an extended visit (see @WhigDuke's excellent book 'War and Diplomacy'). But he was in Vienna in Spring/early Summer 1821.
Robert, on the other hand, was definitely in London in July 1821--as a senior cabinet minister he attended George IV's coronation on July 19. So, arguably, Robert was a more present subject for Dighton in London through Spring and early Summer 1821. Not conclusive, but important.
We can also compare the face in the Dighton print to two portraits done at roughly the same time presenting reliable likenesses of each Londonderry: Chantrey's 1821 bust of Robert (@YaleBritishArt) and Lawrence's 1818/19 portrait of Charles (print shown here in BM collection).
I wish I could offer you a conclusive answer, #twitterstorians, but this is one where the jury is still out.
The late-Renaissance building with an inner courtyard surrounded by arcades was multi-functional: it housed the royal stables, guest apartments, the royal art collection, and an armoury. In fact, the ground floor is still used as the stables for the vaunted Lipizzaner Stallions.
Around 1711 the Stallburg also became the home of the Ziffernkanzlei--the 'Number Office.'
A name both suggestive and vague (and one of many used throughout the organization's existence), it was really the secret office for mail interception and decryption.
Castlereagh Creeping the House of Lords, or the Story of a Misidentified Portrait.
A 🧵
2 artists captured the proceedings against Queen Caroline in the #HouseofLords in 1820, and both include #ViscountCastlereagh. Let's start with James Stephanoff.
Stephanoff shows Castlereagh perched on a staircase, watching from a small window. The 1823 key for Stephanoff's work identifies this figure as "The Marquis of Londonderry [Castlereagh], who usually took his station on the stairs leading to the gallery during the investigation."
The other portrayal of the trial is, of course, George Hayter's monumental painting. Hayter, however, shows Castlereagh positioned in the box of the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, on the bottom right corner.
I was at a loss for how to mark the day after spending the last 2 years writing the research article on which all these tweets are based.
Maybe something more reflective is fitting.
I had always been interested in Castlereagh from a diplomatic and political standpoint...
2/
...and became increasingly interested in exploring the mental health aspect of his story because it was a challenging area that would combine history, politics, psychology, medicine, and other disciplines.
In the last few months of #Castlereagh200 threads we've covered a lot of ground, looking at many stressors that put Castlereagh's #MentalHealth at risk.
Now that we're only days from the bicentenary of his death, let's look at some conclusions.
First, the stress on Castlereagh was cumulative and pervasive. The downward spiral that he experienced in the weeks preceding his suicide was only the final chapter in a story that had been developing for yrs. The overlap between the professional and the social made it worse.
2/
Castlereagh was arguably a successful policymaker. But what did that require? He had to be a strategist, a tactician, a courtier, a whip, an orator, a master of protocol, an ambassador, a traveller, a negotiator, a socialite, and a political campaigner.
3/
As we turn the corner into the week of August 12, I want to focus this #Castlereagh200 🧵 on a final area of #MentalHealth risk connected to the workplace: job insecurity.
If you've been following these #Castlereagh200 threads, you may call that I'm drawing from a risk framework that forms the basis for my upcoming article on Castlereagh and mental health. See the attached table, adapted from Boini, 2020 and Gollac et al, 2011.
2/14
Job insecurity has long been recognized as a mental health risk. But was Castlereagh's job insecure? No.
Electorally he was in safe seats, only losing his home seat briefly in 1805. His position in Cabinet after 1812 was arguably more secure than Liverpool's.
Value conflicts can be internal (e.g. an individual having to choose between competing values at a personal level) or external (e.g. an individual's personal values conflicting with a competing value system in their professional or social environment).
2/
In the workplace, value conflicts can create the perception that a competing value system is keeping a person from achieving good or just outcomes, or can lead to ethical dilemmas. The tension can be difficult to identify, but pervasive and demoralizing.