#1: Not describing the problem that your study is solving
🌪️ The purpose of your Introduction section is to motivate the need for your study. Introducing tension is a great way of doing that!
#2: The Introduction section is too long
📏 Only mention research that gives context to the problem you are solving. The Introduction section isn't a literature review!
#3: The paragraphs are too long
🧱 Nobody likes to read an unstructured wall of text. 100-200 words is the optimal length for a paragraph, and each should cover one specific topic.
#4: The sentences are too long and convoluted
⛓️ Writing short sentences is harder to do than it sounds. My rule of thumb is one main and one subordinate clause per sentence. Remember the aim for our writing is to be clear, not to sound fancy!
#5: A boring first sentence
🥱 The first sentence of your Introduction section is a powerful position because it is the first sentence of your whole paper. Hook your reader right from the get-go!
#6: The Introduction section doesn't flow
🌊 You want to guide your reader through your section. A great way of doing that is by linking your sentences and paragraphs together.
#7: Using too many synonyms
😵💫 Often researchers are afraid of repetition. But do you know what's worse than boring your reader? Confusing them! Introduce or explain each term and then stick to it.
TL;DR: The 7 most common mistakes in the Introduction section
#1: Not describing a problem
#2: Section is too long
#3: Wall of text
#4: Sentences are too long
#5: Boring first sentence
#6: No flow
#7: Too many synonyms
If you found this thread helpful, this free training where we go over the whole process of developing and writing a paper (including the Introduction section) will be ideal. 👇✨
As an academic writing coach, here are the 9 questions I recommend to agree on with your co-authors BEFORE you start writing your paper so you can produce a well-written article time-efficiently.
#1: Thinking it’s laziness when you are procrastinating on your paper
🦥 Most PhD students procrastinate writing their paper (aka have ‘blank page syndrome’) not because they are lazy but because they don’t know where to start tackling this overwhelming project.
#2: Starting to write your paper by “writing”
📋 The first step of writing a paper isn’t to type out full sentences. It’s more efficient to first develop your story and create a good outline so writing just becomes filling in the gaps.
• Must-read for anyone who feels like emails (Slack, meetings...) are ruling their day
• How to actually work and not only talk about work
• Written by a computer science professor and the author of "Deep Work"
📚2: Laziness Does Not Exist by Devon Price
• Must-read for anyone who is overworked yet feels lazy
• Comprehensive take on how to put boundaries around work, news, friendships so we can actually feel happy and content with life
• Written by a social psychology professor
As an academic writing coach, here are the 7 mistakes I see supervisors and PIs make in the process of co-writing a paper with their PhD students or mentees.
#1 Not teaching your students the steps that are part of the process to write a paper
🙆 The main reason novice writers procrastinate on that task to write a paper is that they don’t know how to get started and break this huge and overwhelming project into manageable chunks.
#2: Only editing the grammar, punctuation and syntax of your students’ work
📋 First drafts usually benefit the most from structural comments to make sure the paper tells a single and compelling story. Do that before you spend hours on moving commas.
Ever got told to "tell a story" in your article? Including an element of tension is how you do it!
✅ Clearly describe the problem that your study is solving
#2: Ignoring the broader perspective
It's easy to get bogged down in details when you're writing your paper, but it won't be obvious to your reader how your research relates to the field and society if you don't spell it out.
✅ Explain the broader implications of your research