As an academic writing coach, here are the 7 most common mistakes I see researchers make when writing the Introduction section of their paper.

A thread. 🧵

#AcademicChatter #AcWri #newPI
#1: Not describing the problem that your study is solving

🌪️ The purpose of your Introduction section is to motivate the need for your study. Introducing tension is a great way of doing that!
#2: The Introduction section is too long

📏 Only mention research that gives context to the problem you are solving. The Introduction section isn't a literature review!
#3: The paragraphs are too long

🧱 Nobody likes to read an unstructured wall of text. 100-200 words is the optimal length for a paragraph, and each should cover one specific topic.
#4: The sentences are too long and convoluted

⛓️ Writing short sentences is harder to do than it sounds. My rule of thumb is one main and one subordinate clause per sentence. Remember the aim for our writing is to be clear, not to sound fancy!
#5: A boring first sentence

🥱 The first sentence of your Introduction section is a powerful position because it is the first sentence of your whole paper. Hook your reader right from the get-go!
#6: The Introduction section doesn't flow

🌊 You want to guide your reader through your section. A great way of doing that is by linking your sentences and paragraphs together.
#7: Using too many synonyms

😵‍💫 Often researchers are afraid of repetition. But do you know what's worse than boring your reader? Confusing them! Introduce or explain each term and then stick to it.
TL;DR: The 7 most common mistakes in the Introduction section

#1: Not describing a problem
#2: Section is too long
#3: Wall of text
#4: Sentences are too long
#5: Boring first sentence
#6: No flow
#7: Too many synonyms
If you found this thread helpful, this free training where we go over the whole process of developing and writing a paper (including the Introduction section) will be ideal. 👇✨

annaclemens.com/training?utm_s…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anna Clemens, PhD

Anna Clemens, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @scientistswrite

Dec 28, 2022
As an academic writing coach, here are the 9 questions I recommend to agree on with your co-authors BEFORE you start writing your paper so you can produce a well-written article time-efficiently.

(And stay on good terms with your collaborators!)

A thread. 🧵

#AcademicTwitter
#1: Who owns the project?

👩‍🔬 That person is responsible for keeping the project and writing on track, arranges meetings and is likely the first or last author of the paper.
#2: Who is going to write which part of the paper?

🔬 Don't forget to discuss who is going to write/co-write the Introduction, Discussion and Abstract.
Read 13 tweets
Dec 19, 2022
As an academic writing coach, here are the 9 mistakes I see PhD and grad students make when writing scientific papers.

A thread. 🧵

#PhDchat #ECRchat
#1: Thinking it’s laziness when you are procrastinating on your paper

🦥 Most PhD students procrastinate writing their paper (aka have ‘blank page syndrome’) not because they are lazy but because they don’t know where to start tackling this overwhelming project.
#2: Starting to write your paper by “writing”

📋 The first step of writing a paper isn’t to type out full sentences. It’s more efficient to first develop your story and create a good outline so writing just becomes filling in the gaps.
Read 14 tweets
Dec 14, 2022
The holidays are coming up, which hopefully means for you having lots of rest and time to read. 🌲 🎁

Here are my top 8 book recommendations for researchers and academics to feel inspired and motivated going into 2023! (They make great gifts too!)

#AcademicChatter #Postdoc
📚1: A World Without Email by Cal Newport

• Must-read for anyone who feels like emails (Slack, meetings...) are ruling their day
• How to actually work and not only talk about work
• Written by a computer science professor and the author of "Deep Work"
📚2: Laziness Does Not Exist by Devon Price

• Must-read for anyone who is overworked yet feels lazy
• Comprehensive take on how to put boundaries around work, news, friendships so we can actually feel happy and content with life
• Written by a social psychology professor
Read 13 tweets
Dec 7, 2022
As an academic writing coach, here are the 7 mistakes I see supervisors and PIs make in the process of co-writing a paper with their PhD students or mentees.

A thread. 🧵

#AcademicChatter #newPI #PhDchat
#1 Not teaching your students the steps that are part of the process to write a paper

🙆 The main reason novice writers procrastinate on that task to write a paper is that they don’t know how to get started and break this huge and overwhelming project into manageable chunks.
#2: Only editing the grammar, punctuation and syntax of your students’ work

📋 First drafts usually benefit the most from structural comments to make sure the paper tells a single and compelling story. Do that before you spend hours on moving commas.
Read 12 tweets
Dec 1, 2022
The title of your paper is your shop front.

Here are 10 rules to write a compelling title for your scientific article.

A thread. 🧵

#AcademicChatter @TheStrugglingS4 #Postdoc
#1: The title should describe your main result

📌 Your reader will want to know what exactly the take-away message of your paper is.
#2: The title doesn't need to convey every detail

📚 Don't try to cram information into your title and don't try to communicate more than 1 key take-away in your title.
Read 13 tweets
Nov 23, 2022
As an academic writing coach, here are the 5⃣ most common mistakes I see researchers make in their scientific papers.

🧵A thread.

#AcademicChatter #PostDoc
#1: Neglecting tension

Ever got told to "tell a story" in your article? Including an element of tension is how you do it!

✅ Clearly describe the problem that your study is solving
#2: Ignoring the broader perspective

It's easy to get bogged down in details when you're writing your paper, but it won't be obvious to your reader how your research relates to the field and society if you don't spell it out.

✅ Explain the broader implications of your research
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(