#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench led by Justice KM Joseph to hear pleas regarding question of if WhatsApp's 2021 privacy policy violates users' right to privacy.

#WhatsApp @WhatsApp #privacy #policy #SupremeCourtOfIndia
SG: Data protection bill will be introduced, subject to administrative issues, in the second half of this session which started today. We have filed on affidavit

Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: Lordships may wait for the bill to be passed in light of this ...

Sr Adv Shyam Divan: I oppose
Divan: This was raised earlier as well. Previous bill was withdrawn.
SG: The bill supports Mr Divan's contentions.

Divan: Let the matter be heard when it is called out.

Bench discusses.

#SupremeCourt
Justice Roy: Mr Divan you are right that the bill may not cover all grounds. But since it is a legislative exercise being done with some wisdom, perhaps we can wait.

Divan: The writ is from 2016. The validity of that needs to be considered. The bill that is out for comment...
Divan: that has no impact on this case. There are generalities and provisions in it that do not deal with us at all, but i cannot say what all they will synthesise in the bill. We are anxious to go forth with this case.

#SupremeCourt
Divan: They had said we can proceed in January if bill not passed yet.

Justice Rastogi: But let us get its benefit.
Adv: In a congress hearing, Mr Zuckerberg admitted to data leaks. Cambridge Analytica happened.

Justice Roy: In a housekeeping hearing it is getting so heated (smiles).
Divan points out that the earlier hearing (adultery) still going on.
SG: New bill and rules is intermediary centric.
SG: Question is a few weeks, but i submit to your lordships.

SC: We will not do anything on mentioning. address us after part heard.

Counsel: Alright.
Sibal: Actually this litigation is directed towards WhatsApp. But bill deals with all intermediaries. I have a copy of the bill and have formulated some issues.

SC: We have to consider if Bill's ambit covers ...

SG: I am supporting Mr Divan.
SG: We intend to introduce it in second half.
Justice Bose: A recent judgment has said that some non State actors can be Petitioned against for fundamental rights ...

Sibal: It will be an academic exercise.

SC: What is the clash?

Divan: What was distributed for comment will be different from what is introduced.
Divan: The (WhatsApp privacy) policy underwent a significant change since. They have said meta data will be shared with Facebook. That was the subject matter of challenge, HC had said that since privacy matter was pending ... They cast doubt wrt maintainability of petition qua...
Divan: private parties.
SC: What is the relief that we can give?
Divan: You cannot share my data with Facebook group of companies. We want an opt out option, seek a declaration to that effect. There should be a meaningful option.
Divan: That option not available to Indian users. There is a public interest element to this.

SC: If that is the subject matter of the legislation? If the law gives the same relief ...

Divan: We do now know what the law will have.

Sibal: It is a complete overlap.
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: This is not a Vishakha situation. There are provisos in the Act.
Sibal: Atleast have the bill with you.

#SupremeCourt
Counsel for PIL petitioner representing a group of startups: I have filed issues. They are generally that no test has been laid out.

#SupremeCourt
Divan: May i suggest we assemble tomorrow?

Justice Rastogi: If the matter has been pending for some time and now bill is to be placed, what will happen if (we do not hear now)

Divan: Issue is ripe for hearing. Just on the apprehension that a bill will be introduced. It will..
Divan: not be looked at over here.
SC: Tomorrow we will consider if we need to hear it, it won't be a marathon hearing.

SG: One minute my lords.

SC: You know what prompts a judge to rise at 4 no?

Justice Roy: I have another meeting.
SG: Mr Divan has given an impression that he is fighting with everyone. But debate on bill should not be permitted here.

Divan: Not doing that.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench - Live Threads

Bar & Bench - Live Threads Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lawbarandbench

Feb 1
Gujarat High Court questions Surat Municipal Corporation for its "efficiency" since till Monday the civic body had sealed only 63 shops selling meat without proper licence and in unhygienic conditions. But today, the number has rose to 570 plus shops.

#GujaratHighCourt Image
Bench led by Chief Justice Aravind Kumar asks the civic body "how it became so much efficient overnight?"

CJ: How is it possible? We will ask District Legal Service Authority to visit the shops and cross check the data.

Ordered accordingly.

#GujaratHighCourt
#IllegalMeatShops
Bench has asked State to clarify if it has constituted District Slaughter House Committees to oversee if slaughtering of animals is being done as per law across Gujarat.

Meanwhile, Sr Adv Percy Kavina for some licenced shop owners urge the bench to make them a party to the PIL.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 1
#SupremeCourt #CourtroomExchange

Bench after disposing of an election petition

Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul: We need some thinking out of the box. So many statutes have limitations, but the matters are not heard on time. If you have specialised Tribunals, these are but manned. Image
Former AG Mukul Rohatgi: This retired judge syndrome must end. Those in TDSAT or electricity matters would have never dealt with such matters in their life.

Justice Kaul: That is why by and large like in AFTs, where there is balance of judicial and military members, worked well
Counsel: Regional benches can help.

Justice Kaul: I would not mind sitting in Chennai.

Rohatgi: Bengaluru is anyways a better city.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 1
A constitution bench of the Supreme Court will decide today if the challenge to WhatsApp's privacy policy needs to be heard right away or deferred in light of the new Personal Data Protection Bill to be introduced in Parliament soon.

@WhatsApp #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia Image
Justice Roy: Today we have AG and SG - what you were saying is there is many a slip between the cup & the lip. Just because bill is proposed to be presented before the parliament.. it could go before a committee for deliberation..

@WhatsApp #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtOfIndia
Read 118 tweets
Jan 31
#SupremeCourt hearing matter regarding reservations in promotions. Image
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: States may be directed to begin collecting data. Several SLPs pending before this court, Court may first decide on how Union is to collect data. Almost all States are currently before you.
Jaising: Union employees include Railways, Ministry of Defence. Deliberation of this Court will apply to employees across States.

Sr Adv Gopal Sankaranarayanan: Mr Jaising is not right in saying Union has to be heard first. Haryana orders were ordered to be so.
Read 18 tweets
Jan 31
#SupremeCourt hearing PIL challenging political parties using names with religious connotations.
Sr Adv Gaurav Bhatia: Rejoinder may not be needed.
Bench asks Sr Adv and former AG KK Venugopal who he is appearing for: This is an application. Lots of other parties will be affected. Far reaching consequences. Lordships may consider, it should go before Constitution bench. Petitioner is himself on bail, he said businessman.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 31
#SupremeCourt hearing plea by former Karnataka Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa against Karnataka HC order refusing to quash FIR under PC Act in connection with illegal land denotification case.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia
Counsel informs hour long arguments will be needed.

CJI: We will keep it next Tuesday?
Another adv argues matter is infructuous.

#SupremeCourt
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(