Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 1, 2023 15 tweets 12 min read Read on X
I agree .@lonnibesancon - this is shameless.

You, Bik, Gideon and Sheldrick did nothing to expose #surgisphere.

We did. The people you hate so much and denigrate. Doctors and scientists who are not supported by pharma millions.
@chrismartenson Image
And yet you join the ranks of the "no-expertise experts" recruited in 2020 do fulfil a particular role in #COVID

Just one first author paper before 2020.

How does someone get a PhD with one first author paper? Image
And then suddenly you are given the job of writing papers with @GidMK which go straight into @NEJM, the home of the #surgisphere fraud.

Who fast-tracked your paper?

Who are you - with no research history - to be first author on this letter to NEJM?

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Besan%C3… Image
Now... where have I seen this before @FeeRedfern?

Vanatech "behavioural sciences" in the UK?

A shell company. Nudge units.

Where did I catch them before?
How did Steadson call you to write this letter?
Who is David Steadson? ImageImage
@DavidSteadson only has two papers on pubmed.gov in total.

So why is he running an extremely suspicious and coviert "behavioural engineering" unit and getting Besancon to front letters to the @NEJM?

What exactly do @vana_tech do? Image
David Steadson (with the Azov flag in his bio) has ZERO medical publications pre-COVID.

So if he is not driving Lonni, that means it must be @FLAHAULT (the 3rd author) at the "Institute of Global Health"

Hmmm ImageImage
Flahault is a huge name in "Global Health" aka WHO aka "OneHealth" - all linked organisations.

Hugely eminent, but now on the dark side of medicine.

So how does he get involved with two hardly-published authors to front a letter to the @NEJM? Image
Well through @vana_tech of course - the company that does "nothing" and has no presence on the internet.

▶️Find a junior researcher with no publications.
▶️Ghost write a script for them.
▶️Use your bigwig to underwrite the letter.
and finally...
▶️Publish in the totally captured @TheLancet or @NEJM both of which publish total junk like #surgisphere...

Which they would have gotten away with if it hadn't been for those pesky #mousearmy twitterers
And THAT is how your unknown researcher gets elevated to "expert"

And THAT is #poogate and #lancetgate and #BeijingGideon and #ChisquaredKyle and all the other astroturf "fraud busters".

And I bet if you look hard enough you will find a link between Vanatech and recently exposed 77th brigade...

Or Andrew Hill, @UNITAID and the #MAGICapp that led to so many deaths by withdrawing antibiotics from the elderly.

This is not over. Not by a long chalk
#3tblets.
Well I think we have the answer.

Steadson's following list is a real who's who of COVID zealots, including Daszak, Gorski, Bik, multiple 77th accounts.

And... Ukraine extremists
And... ASIO.
I mean, who TF follows ASIO?

This guy makes Alexander Downer look tame. ImageImageImage
I'll be blocking #UkraineDave as I do with all the Azov accounts.

It's not worth the hassle of engaging with the military "disinformation units".

They will expose themselves eventually.

He can bleat all he wants.
archive.is/wip/QRVbu
Yes the 77th brigade are real.

Real scum committing real treason.

Not real soldiers.

This one's for you @FeeRedfern

Vanatech and BETA - the Australian government AI nudge unit.

Did AI create the MAGIC app protocol that killed so many of our elderly because AI does not understand the nuances of human medicine? Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Oct 17
When "real world" data is this complete and the findings are too good to be true - contradicting those from the @CDCgov's own V-safe registry...

It's likely to be synthetic, until proven otherwise.

There is ZERO reason to restrict this data.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/jsm2334/status…Image
BINGO.

In France in 2021 only 25% of women received a COVID vaccine during pregnancy and most of those were second trimester.

Therefore it's not possible that 25% of the French pregnancy registry received 1st trimester vaccination.

Image
Image
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.

There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.

Bernard jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
Quentin registry
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@franklin_reeder @chrismartensonImage
Read 7 tweets
Oct 15
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.

It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.

THREAD response🧵below Image
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.

It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.

If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster Image
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.

A huge difference not explainable by chance. Image
Read 17 tweets
Oct 4
HOLY 🧀

The lead of the WHO steering committee - that stopped your elderly relative getting antibiotics for COVID - was Janet Diaz.

But Fiona Godlee, who lied about @DrAndyWakefield, and lied about the @bmj_latest being paid by Merck, was on the committee https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/be027488-3a45-4ba2-b413-6914d198714f/content
Janet Diaz was the person that led the #MAGICApp guideline committees that stopped your grandma getting antibiotics for her post-viral pneumonia, leading to her death.

But she did this with the help of @pervandvik who deleted his account

Image
Diaz here tells you that COVID kills you by an overreacting immune response, but that was never true.

She was an intensivist recruited by the WHO in 2018.

None of this was true, but it sold a LOT of drugs and killed a LOT of people
Read 9 tweets
Sep 26
Hey @Grok...

Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?

When was DARPA created?
nuke.fas.org/control/ctr/ne… x.com/grok/status/19…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 25
🚨THREAD:
At first glance this is a non-story as Moderna will claim that what they said was a mistake.

BUT @RWMaloneMD must know something as he states clearly that Pfizer manipulated the biodistribution images.

Why did they want to hide that it went to the ovaries?
👇👇 Image
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).

Other "scientists" - acting on behalf of Pfizer - were mobilised to hide this scandal
arkmedic.info/p/whats-your-a…
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.

mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4…
Read 14 tweets
Sep 19
Laura Wilson of @tandfonline can either choose to uphold scientific integrity.

Or choose to be an accessory in the biggest securities fraud scandal of our time.

I wonder what she will choose.

@STMAssoc is sponsored by @Silverchairnews

@Kevin_McKernan
#pubpeergate Image
Image
Can you see how it works?

Institutes like the @STMAssoc get their money from the journals who get their money from pharma.

And Bill Gates.

All controlled by big money interests.

Laura has no chance.
Unless she blows the whistle to the @SECGov

But this time the Arnold foundation's @RetractionWatch have not only revealed with their "exclusive" that they were directly involved in trying to get this important paper retracted...

But are trying to make Wilson the fall guy.

stm-assoc.org/people/laura-w…Image
Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(