Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 1, 2023 15 tweets 12 min read Read on X
I agree .@lonnibesancon - this is shameless.

You, Bik, Gideon and Sheldrick did nothing to expose #surgisphere.

We did. The people you hate so much and denigrate. Doctors and scientists who are not supported by pharma millions.
@chrismartenson Image
And yet you join the ranks of the "no-expertise experts" recruited in 2020 do fulfil a particular role in #COVID

Just one first author paper before 2020.

How does someone get a PhD with one first author paper? Image
And then suddenly you are given the job of writing papers with @GidMK which go straight into @NEJM, the home of the #surgisphere fraud.

Who fast-tracked your paper?

Who are you - with no research history - to be first author on this letter to NEJM?

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Besan%C3… Image
Now... where have I seen this before @FeeRedfern?

Vanatech "behavioural sciences" in the UK?

A shell company. Nudge units.

Where did I catch them before?
How did Steadson call you to write this letter?
Who is David Steadson? ImageImage
@DavidSteadson only has two papers on pubmed.gov in total.

So why is he running an extremely suspicious and coviert "behavioural engineering" unit and getting Besancon to front letters to the @NEJM?

What exactly do @vana_tech do? Image
David Steadson (with the Azov flag in his bio) has ZERO medical publications pre-COVID.

So if he is not driving Lonni, that means it must be @FLAHAULT (the 3rd author) at the "Institute of Global Health"

Hmmm ImageImage
Flahault is a huge name in "Global Health" aka WHO aka "OneHealth" - all linked organisations.

Hugely eminent, but now on the dark side of medicine.

So how does he get involved with two hardly-published authors to front a letter to the @NEJM? Image
Well through @vana_tech of course - the company that does "nothing" and has no presence on the internet.

▶️Find a junior researcher with no publications.
▶️Ghost write a script for them.
▶️Use your bigwig to underwrite the letter.
and finally...
▶️Publish in the totally captured @TheLancet or @NEJM both of which publish total junk like #surgisphere...

Which they would have gotten away with if it hadn't been for those pesky #mousearmy twitterers
And THAT is how your unknown researcher gets elevated to "expert"

And THAT is #poogate and #lancetgate and #BeijingGideon and #ChisquaredKyle and all the other astroturf "fraud busters".

And I bet if you look hard enough you will find a link between Vanatech and recently exposed 77th brigade...

Or Andrew Hill, @UNITAID and the #MAGICapp that led to so many deaths by withdrawing antibiotics from the elderly.

This is not over. Not by a long chalk
#3tblets.
Well I think we have the answer.

Steadson's following list is a real who's who of COVID zealots, including Daszak, Gorski, Bik, multiple 77th accounts.

And... Ukraine extremists
And... ASIO.
I mean, who TF follows ASIO?

This guy makes Alexander Downer look tame. ImageImageImage
I'll be blocking #UkraineDave as I do with all the Azov accounts.

It's not worth the hassle of engaging with the military "disinformation units".

They will expose themselves eventually.

He can bleat all he wants.
archive.is/wip/QRVbu
Yes the 77th brigade are real.

Real scum committing real treason.

Not real soldiers.

This one's for you @FeeRedfern

Vanatech and BETA - the Australian government AI nudge unit.

Did AI create the MAGIC app protocol that killed so many of our elderly because AI does not understand the nuances of human medicine? Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Nov 29
WHOA💥💥💥💥

It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.

Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.

#Spraygate takes a new turn 👇🧵
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.

This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics).
nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"

That stops the chlorine killing off your "MLV" aka engineered virus.
bestvetsolutions.sharepoint.com/Product%20Info…Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 26
There are a lot of pharma agents celebrating on twitter recently because the now-conflicted @cochranecollab dropped their standards and published something on HPV vaccination they didn't understand.

To explain it you need to understand the difference between the two studies quoted.

The first (Bergman) analysed a bunch of real studies (including RCTs) and concluded that the effect on cancer couldn't be seen - despite nearly 20 years of follow up.

The second (Henschke) cherry picked a bunch of "real world data" studies and concluded that the vaccine prevented a gazillion cervical cancers, pretending that it analysed 132 million patient records. It did nothing of the sort. What it did was look at two studies, take out the bit where it showed that the vaccine increased the risk of cancer (Kjaer 2021, over 20s) - replicated in multiple country statistics, split them into three studies, ignore the other studies showing the opposite, and ignore the fact that none of this data is verifiable.

Notably, one of the major studies (Palmer 2024, which was found to be seriously flawed) has been excluded from the meta-analysis because it did not show a cancer benefit in the under 16 age group.

It is very difficult to "fix" a randomised controlled trial.
It is very easy to "fix" a meta-analysis of observational studies where the data is "not available".

There is a huge difference between "real" studies and "real world data" studies because the latter are cherry picked or even fully synthetic, and the authors don't have access to the data. They are produced by vested interests groups to sell a narrative.

This was the most corrupted review that Cochrane have ever performed and this time they shot themselves in the foot by contradicting their own reviews.
cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.10…

@PGtzsche1 @MaryanneDemasi @SenatorAntic @DrJulieSladden @Fynnderella1 @missyTHX1138 @RWMaloneMD @RetsefL @BrokenTruthTV @RMConservativeImage
Image
"Scotland HPV vaccine study flawed" - explaining how the Scotland data on HPV was misrepresented to show an effect that wasn't real

blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/the-hpv-vacc…
How "real world data" papers claim to use electronic health records data but can't be verified and in many cases are not even real.

@ClareCraigPath
#Surgisphere #Penngate #EMRgate
arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Read 4 tweets
Nov 24
Thank you @davidbahry...

your childish insults drew my attention to your lab's quite incredible paper confirming that chronic activation of cGAS-STING, as happens with plasmid-contaminated vaccines, causes cancer.

@Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40463121/Image
Image
@DavidBahry @Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi @JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @DJSpeicher @DrJulieSladden Paper here
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40463121/
@DavidBahry @Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi @JesslovesMJK @Fynnderella1 @DJSpeicher @DrJulieSladden Pro metastatic impact of chronic cGAS-STING activation
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10…
Read 5 tweets
Nov 22
WHOA!

Retraction Watch busted for collusion with Rolf Marschalek, who is not only part of BioNtech's Goethe university..
but - get this - their Corona fund was pump primed by the Quandt family - infamous for their role in Nazi Germany.

You just can't make this stuff up. Image
Image
Image
Image
Receipts - Quandt family values
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2…
More on the Quandts
medium.com/the-collector/…
Read 7 tweets
Nov 2
Can you see how this works?
I ask for rationality, and the Stew Peters brigade jump in.
Now I'm advocating genocide.
Apparently.

The people running these accounts have a LOT of money behind them. They target credible accounts for discrediting. That's their job.
The dude keeps going, but betrays that this is a copycat to a bunch of accounts linked to one dubbed "Penguin" that only appeared when I pointed out the Joe Sansone scam that is being coordinated by Sasha Latypova to derail legal cases.

Unhinged.
"DARVO bioterrorist agent". 🤦

This is the level of well poisoning that is part of the Sansone-Ruby-Latypova scam.

Good luck with this one in court.

@BlackTomThePyr8
Read 7 tweets
Oct 17
When "real world" data is this complete and the findings are too good to be true - contradicting those from the @CDCgov's own V-safe registry...

It's likely to be synthetic, until proven otherwise.

There is ZERO reason to restrict this data.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/jsm2334/status…Image
BINGO.

In France in 2021 only 25% of women received a COVID vaccine during pregnancy and most of those were second trimester.

Therefore it's not possible that 25% of the French pregnancy registry received 1st trimester vaccination.

Image
Image
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.

There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.

Bernard jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
Quentin registry
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@franklin_reeder @chrismartensonImage
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(