But they do know about eg hydraulics & fluid dynamics
In the real world
And they know you still can't accurately model flow in a canal never mind a river or estuary
To model the climate which is average weather you have to model...
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis To model the climate which is average weather you have to model not just fluid flow in rivers lakes estuaries coastal seas oceans..
And the atmosphere
But temperature & eg salt flow within the water
And temperature within the water and between it & the atmosphere
Engineers & real scientists know the MMGW "Scientists" haven't a clue
Once saw a MMGW documentary where they showed two screens showing weather patterns
Once showed actual weather data as it came info the area...
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis The other screen showed the weather as calculated by the climate model
They exactly matched
And had been exactly matching for 30 years
They tried to give impression they'd set the model running 30 years ago & it had bee correctly "forecasting" the weather for 30 years
If....
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis If that was true we'd now be getting spot on 50 or 100 year weather forecasts never mind 30 year ones
What was actually happening was the model could take the data coming in & forecast ONE SECOND ahead before breaking down!!!
If they were telling the truth wouldn't need to lie!
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis And if they could "prove" MMGW by doing an experiment "proving" CO2 was a Greenhouse Gas in a yard long horizontal tube a "greenhouse" model or even a gallon container in your garage you could model the weather in them too
YOU CAN'T!
What they're doing is trying to model...
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis What they're doing is trying to model historic climate (which is average weather) trends & project them forward
That's like trying to model someone's weekly travel Mon-Fri & project to the WE
Or even daily travel for months then try to project travel during holiday
CAN'T WORK!
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis They can look at data for 40 years travel then try to predict travel in retirement
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis Did you catch the FOUR UK TV/Radio "ClimateGate" "documentaries"/"docudramas" before COP26
All basically said Climate "scientists" truthful heroes saving planet & Special Branch had to investigate evil criminal hacker who tried to libel them with false..
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis All "documentaries" said hacker libelled "scientists" with false accusation of con-trick
Were thousands of emails & lines of annotated code showing collusion conspiracy to get pal-review block dissent get rid of opponents destroy data if threatened...
So why not use latest dendrochronology / dendroclimatology
Why replace BEST tree-ring data for Hockey Stick graph
And use WORST for rest of graph
ONLY explanation is that BEST date gave "wrong" answer
So MUST be CON trick!
@TyotoRiffle@DrLoupis The pre COP26 "documentaries" & Climate "scientists" also claim many investigations by peers confirmed Climate "scientists right & is MMGW
Actually only one by mate of subject totally exonerated him & claimed was right
With all the troubles in the world why do you have to obsess over infiltrating men who would prefer to dress up in floral frocks stockings & lipstick into boring black cassocks😯
With all the troubles in the world why do you have to obsess over infiltrating men who would prefer to dress up in floral frocks stockings & lipstick into boring black cassocks😯
By the way it's Marriage RITE NOT "Right"😮
Churches do it to promote growth😲🤦♂️
By the way it's Marriage RITE NOT "Right"😮
Churches do it to promote growth😲🤦♂️
Usually
Unlike the Shakers
Who banned sex even in marriage
And so died out
Like the Russian Skoptsy sect who castrated themselves😱
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Of course you did
And of course you are
Lets assume the pandemic was as dangerous as claimed
And the deaths were going to be as high as predicted
We also knew that the deaths from lockdowns would be even higher
Based on half a century of research
On a century of data!😲😱🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette And we also had pandemic plans in place that were based on even worse pandemics than predicted for Covid
eg the US plan was based on nearly a million fatalities
But didn't include lockdowns
So why did we lock down & isolate the healthy
When we knew that would kill more!😲😱🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Despite fact we knew from Diamond Princess Covid wouldn't be that bad
And we knew from very early on that kids couldn't & didn't infect adults
Yet we even locked down kids & prevented their normal education & development
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette What test tells you if the Covid19 virus is "live or dead"?
I thought YOU were the expert!
How did *#I* validate it?😲🤦♂️
In *#MY* lab you mean?!😂🤣🤣
The PCR "Test" certainly doesn't tell you if the FRAGMENT of virus is alive or dead
Common sense tells you it's stone dead🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette If you WERE an expert you'd know you can only confirm it's alive by growing a sample
But as that takes time & money they didn't seem to bother too much with that
And they should also have notified the doctor of the number of cycles used
Ideally after using a sensible number!🤦♂️
@TakethatCt @Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Medical professionals always knew PCR "Tests" especially at high cycle rates couldn't 7 shouldn't be used for "diagnosing" a disease!😲
Until they started getting paid for testing for & signing off on PCR "Test" Covid19 "diagnoses"😱🤦♂️
@Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette Kary Mullis didn't say finding a trace of a micro-organism IS a diagnosis
IF a person IS ill with the RELEVANT symptoms
The PCR test can be used as a tool to HELP confirm the diagnosis of WHAT the organism is
Finding a scrap of an organism your body destroyed months ago...
@Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette A PCR test finding a scrap of an organism your body destroyed months ago isn't a "diagnosis" you have live ones in your body now
Never mind enough to make you ill
Or infect others
Never mind finding a scrap of virus that just floated up your nose onto the swab into the tube...
@Dozzle101 @RolandRogers2 @DrEtiquette And a PCR test finding a scrap of a virus the floated onto the sample in the lab certainly doesn't "diagnose" anything
And even if it finds a current scrap of a virus that was currently in your body & was currently live & present in some numbers it proves you're infected with it