Before analyzing the final data, let me explain adjustments and revisions BLS does every Jan: 1) revisions to Establishment Survey data and 2) adjustments to population estimates of the Household Survey
IOW we won't know the real situation with the latest NFPs for yrs, and once we find out, it probably won't matter anymore bc at that point sth else entirely will be at play.
Still annual NFP revision in Jan added 311K jobs to the already published data in 2022.
4/24
Population adjustments are always done as if the whole population changes in just one M (Jan).
No prior data is revised.
For that reason Jan and Dec figures in Household Survey are not easily comparable.
Jan adjustments didn't affect UR but greatly overstated employment.
5/24
On top of the already mentioned annual revisions to Establishment Survey and population adjustments for the Household Survey, BLS is constantly revising its prior data.
This can reflect some meaningful changes in all 3 figures (NFP, UR and AHE) M to M.
6/24
As the published data keeps changing all the time it is tough to do forecasts with any degree of certainty, especially that of NFP.
Therefore it's not unusual to see M where all Wall Street analysts miss the headline number by a wide margin:
As @Lavorgnanomics said, NFP are nothing but a random number.
I would add that, although many get hyped over it, NFP don't tell us where #inflation is/will be nor it should be used as a determinant for the #Fed's policy in this environment.
Although these figures will almost certainly get revised lower in the coming M, let's work with what we have for now.
There were strong job gains almost across the board with only mining and finance seeing a slower growth, and IT & utilities seeing (timid) negative growth
9/24
UR ticked down (-0.1 pp) to the cycle low of 3.4%.
Some (including the #Fed) will certainly try to use this as a non-#recession argument but we've had recessions with lower UR.
Also this doesn't mean low UR will cause #inflation. More on this:
As usual, AHE are the most important detail of the employment report.
Most would interpret the wage growth number as encouraging bc 3.6% annualized is where the #Fed wants it to be (within the level consistent with 2% #inflation).
But...
11/24
...average workweek went up from 34.4 to 34.7.
Adjusted for the longer workweek, AHE are actually up a staggering 14.1% annualized.
Now this number is clearly off and should be regarded as noise bc there is no way wage growth went up by that much in Jan.
12/24
For that reason I suspect in the coming M we will see one of the following: 1) Jan AHE gets revised down compared to Dec 2) Jan workweek gets revised down compared to Dec or 3) both 1) and 2)
13/24
Adding to the confusion are the already mentioned BLS revisions of the prior data.
Surprisingly Jan and Mar of 2021 and Feb of 2022 were revised to reflect 0% MoM which is highly unusual (there should have been at least .sth% change +/-).
14/24
Indeed, if you look at some of my prior charts of the same period, they look somewhat different than the latest one.
BLS is constantly doing revisions of both more recent, as well as some older data painting a (sometimes even substantially) different picture from M to M.
15/24
Given the mentioned problems (revisions and unusually higher workweek showing unrealistic numbers), I decided to leave Jan AHE unadjusted for the longer workweek in my analysis.
Also as mentioned on page 13, this will likely get revised to reflect more realistic numbers.
16/24
Probably the most important take from the Jan employment report:
AHE have been below or within the level consistent with 2% #inflation for the last 3M in a row.
For the last 2M wage growth has been lower than the #Fed wants it to be.
18/24
The main #Fed narratives have been disproved by the data:
1) #inflation - "high and sticky" narrative became "services inflation" - but 86%+ and 98% of the CPI disinflated or deflated MoM in Nov and Dec respectively. More details here:
After the #Fed's latest meeting it is clear we are getting near the pause in rate hikes.
Despite what some have been saying, whether the #Fed pauses now or goes 25 in Mar and then pauses or goes 25 in Mar and May and then pauses, makes little difference.
However...
21/24
... there are still some crucial Qs: 1) For how long will the #Fed pause? 2) When will the #Fed cut and by how much? 3) Will #inflation reaccelerate later in the yr like some have said? 4) Will we have a #recession this yr? 5) How will the mkts react to all of that?
22/24
These threads take a lot of time and effort to write.
If you like the content, please love and retweet to help me spread the message.
23/24
I will answer all of these important Qs in more detail at my next
I'm a little late to address the Aug Employment Report but I'm sure you will love what you're about to see here.
The employment report shows further labor market weakening adding to #recession fears.
NFP weaker than expected with big prior 2-month downward revisions
UR edged down (barely) in line with expectations
AHE came in slightly hotter than expected
The #Fed hopes to see no further slowing in the labor mkt.
How plausible is that?
An employment thread.
1/11
Aug #NFP came in at +142K, the 5th lowest month since Dec 2020.
3 of 4 months that are lower than Aug came in the last 5 months.
Jul (+89K) was the lowest since Dec 2020.
In the last 3 months NFP averaged only +116K which is the lowest 3-month avg since Jun 2020.
As a reminder, Jun 2020 was still influenced by the last severe #recession in 2020 induced by the first lockdowns.
It seems hard to imagine that just a few months ago we thought the economy was adding 250K-300K jobs per month.
After downward revisions and recent weaker monthly reads, situation has changed.
Almost all of the months in 2024 were revised down so far (save Mar) with a total downward revision of -365K.
To put things into perspective, that's more than 2.5 times larger than Aug NFP.
2/11
Now we come to the most interesting part.
There is a high chance that Aug NFP also gets revised down.
If we assume that it will be revised down by the average downward revisions so far in 2024 (-52.1K) we come to only +90K.
And that's before CES annual revisions.
If CES annual revisions in 2024 are the same as in 2023 (-68.2K per month on average), we could be looking at only +22K roughly in Aug.
If Aug ends up anywhere near +22K after all is said and done, these levels would be outright #recession ary.
Now, downward revisions could also be less than avg so let's say they are "just" -25K like in Jul, we would still be looking at +49K, levels that happened both just before and in many last recessions.
So current NFP levels are actually quite concerning.
Headline #CPI was again up +0.6% MoM NSA, double of what we had in Mar 2023, but still lower than both Mar 2022 (+1.3%) and Mar 2021 (+0.7%).
The strength came from: 1) gasoline prices, 2) seasonality and 3) couple of lagged components.
Gasoline prices added +21 bps, shelter added another +21 bps and motor vehicle insurance added another +8 bps to the headline CPI.
So, +50 bps MoM came from just these 3 components where:
gasoline prices are volatile and could be up one month and down another,
shelter is showing persistent numbers that have no foundation in the real world, and
motor vehicle insurance unexpectedly went up by the most since mid-2020 making Mar the 10th largest MoM jump on record (data going back to 1969).
These 3 components make about 40% of the CPI but were responsible for almost 80% of its MoM gain in Mar.
You know where I'm getting at...
The majority of the index (roughly 60%) is only up +0.1 pp NSA which is negative SA (#deflation).
So, not only #inflation is not accelerating but it was down further from Feb.
Headline was only +3 bps above what was expected.
Unexpectedly high increase in motor vehicle insurance alone is responsible for the headline CPI miss.
Dec Employment Report looks hot on the surface with
💥NFP above +200K
💥UR not going up from 3.7% and
💥AHE running at +0.4% MoM for the 2nd month in a row.
However, there is much more weakness under the hood.
Let's dive deeper into the numbers.
A thread.
1/8
Dec NFP was +216K but Nov and Oct were revised down by a total of -71K with Oct now matching Jun for the lowest NFP number in 3 yrs of only +105K.
So far, almost all months (save Jul) were revised down in 2023 with total downward revision close to -0.5M.
If Dec is revised down in line with the avg revision in the last 3 months (-48K) NFP could end up in line with +170K consensus.
So the total downward revision in 2023 would equal all job gains in Q4.
Downward revisions of such magnitude and persistence don't happen in either strong nor tight labor mkt like some, including the #Fed, have been describing it.
2/8
Private NFP confirm this weakness even more.
Coincidentally, private NFP exactly matched the ADP number this month (+164K) but Nov and Oct were also revised down by a total of -55K.
Oct is now only +44K, the lowest since Dec 2020.
Private NFP were revised down in all months of 2023 by a total of -0.6M.
This is almost 5x the 3MMA for private NFP.
To have 5 months of private NFP taken away by revisions over 11 months is virtually unheard of.
Worth to repeat, this is a sign of weakness, not strength.
Headline CPI at +3.7% YoY (it was +3.0% 2M ago) which is 0.1 pp higher than expected.
Core CPI at +0.3% MoM, again +0.1 pp higher than expected.
Are there reasons for us and the Fed to worry?
Let's delve deeper.
A CPI thread.
1/9
For accountability purposes, I'll say that headline came +0.1 pp higher on YoY basis and +0.1 pp higher on MoM basis than my estimates, while MoM headline and YoY core came in line with my estimates.
Lots of chatter around the latest #JOLTS number that went down to 8.827M, the lowest level since Mar 2021 (8.399M).
Important to note a few things: 1) despite the #Fed frequently saying it, this number was never representative of real labor demand bc it has included many fake job openings (IOW it has overstated labor demand by a wide margin which was especially evident after the lockdowns in 2020/2021) 2) right now JOLTS vs unemployed is 1.5 and the Fed wants to see it at 1. However, there is no guarantee this number will stop falling once it equates with unemployed ppl 3) by the time 2) happens this may actually mean that unemployed ppl are already way above JOLTS bc of 1) 4) if 3) is true this also means that #UR will go way above the Fed's desired level 5) Fed's desired UR is recessionary. IOW they have been expecting and hoping for a #recession while trying to convince every1 #softlanding is their base case
A short thread.
1/6
When the #Fed gets misled by inaccurate numbers like #JOLTS or lagging numbers like #CPI/#PCE one thing is certain - they will overdo it, no matter which direction they go.
And that is what they have done.
First they were 1 yr late to start tightening.
If they don't hike from here they will be 1 yr late to stop raising rates.
If they hike one more time this yr like they say they will then they will be even more late.
In this 1 yr so far they hiked by an unnecessary 300 bps.
At one point chickens will come home to roost.
When the lags from all of these (mostly unnecessary) hikes play out, we will get a long (maybe even severe) #recession.
2/6
The #Fed is trying to convince every1 how they got everything under control bc they can always cut rates if things go haywire.
But #recession is likely to be long bc: 1) many at the Fed still has a hiking bias and recession will likely start long before they realize the damage they've created making them miss the time to reverse course even more 2) lags work both ways meaning it will take a long time for these cuts to take effect just like it has taken for the hiking lags to play out
IOW it would be the best thing if recession started yesterday bc the longer we wait, the more damaging it will be.
For any1 thinking whether #softlanding is possible at this time, my answer is hell no – there is no way to escape the economic damage the Fed has created with their too high rates.
In the last 1.5 yrs they hiked by the most since 1980.
Including B/S this is the most severe tightening of the MP in history and there are still ppl thinking there won’t be any recession that follows?
If much less severe MP tightenings couldn’t pull a soft landing, how on Earth could the Fed be able to pull it off this time?
And the best thing is that they talk about it like it’s a done deal despite the fact that they have never done it with such tightening, not even remotely close.
3/6