CJI: What stage the trial is in ? Assuming he is not entitled to bail under 436A, he has already put 4.5 years. What about it
ASG: HC considered it and rejected it
Justice JB Pardiwala: Prima facie we say 436A will have no application
CJI: but we have to answer why can he be denied regular bail?
Justice Pardiwala: still probe is going on and there is no chargesheet
CJI: how long will you keep him in custody ?
Justice Narasimha: it cannot be open ended from your side. You must say a time.
ASG: till the letters rogatory are answered..
Joseph: 1100 documents and over 300 witnesses to be examined
CJI: HC has held against you in regular bail is flight risk. How will you assure the court that you will not pose a flight risk.
Joseph: they visited thrice in Dubai and I cooperated. When confessional statement was not given they extradited me as a quid pro quo.b
CJI: how long will the process of LRs continue? ,2 years, 3 years.. ? Tell us by when it will conclude? It cannot go on endlessly #ChristianMichel
CJI: you can apply for regular bail in court and we dismiss the contention of 436A. We are not with you on 436A.
Order
CJI: Adv appearing for petitioner pressed 436A Crpc in aid of his submission that he has served half the maximum sentence. We are not inclined to accept contention of petitioner. The extradition decree which has been relied upon by petitioner dated 4.12.2018..
CJI:... Petitioner lawyer relies on latter extracts from extradition decree.. says unamended provisions of 1988 prevention of corruption act were amended by Act 1 of 2014 and then substituted by Act 16 2018.
CJI: Thus it is argued that max sentence will be 7 years and 5 years as per PC Act. Since petitioner was arrested on Dec 4 2018 he has already undergone 4 years 2 months undertrial custody..
CJI: ..and that as per 436A he is entitled to bail. First proviso to 436A says period more than detention can be granted or release on bail with personal bond. Article 7 of extradition treaty between India UAE consists following
CJI: it has emerged before the court that bail is being sought under 436A and that cannot be granted. #ChristianMichel
CJI: the provisions of Section 436A would not be applicable in this case. We find no merit in the SLP. We clarify that present order shall not come in the way of approaching trial court for regular bail #ChristianMichel
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rishab Shetty and Vijay Kiragandur, the director and producer respectively of Kannada movie Kantara move #SupremenCourt challenging anticipatory bail condition imposed by Kerala HC where production before IO on Sundays was mandated
The petitioners were booked for copyright infringement over the song Varaha Roopam
Sr Adv Ranjit Kumar appears for petitioners
CJI DY Chandrachud: We will take this up before we rise for today #SupremeCourt
CJI: you are using this music in Kantara?
Singh: yes they are saying it is from Vara Roopam
Justice PS Narasimha: But this is movie is there for a year #Kantara
Constitution bench of the #SupremeCourt Constitution Bench to deliver verdict on the petitions challenging the validity of the All India Bar Exam #AIBE
The three main issues which the judgment will answer are:
Can the Bar Council of India (BCI) prescribe a pre-enrolment exam as a condition precedent for enrolment?
Can BCI prescribe pre-enrolment training in terms of its training rules issued in 1995?
The last issue for consideration was: If a pre-enrolment exam is not permitted, can BCI prescribe a post-enrolment exam in alignment with Section 49 (1) (ah) of Advocates Act, 1961?
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench of Justices Kaul, Khanna, Abhay S Oka, Vikram Nath and JK Maheshwari will deliver judgment on whether the #Bohra community has the right to excommunicate dissidents in exercise of its fundamental rights under Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution
The top court will lay down the law regarding the correctness of its 1962 judgment in Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin v. The State Of Bombay, in which it had protected the rights of the Bohra community to excommunicate members #SupremeCourt#Bohra
Court: Decision of constitution bench requires reconsideration. We have recorded reasons. There are two grounds.
Gujarat High Court reserves orders in a petition by Gujarat University challenging direction to furnish copies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's degree certificate to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the University argued before bench of Justice Biren Vaishnav.
SG: There is nothing to hide as the degree is there in public domain, on social media etc. But we cannot be compelled to disclose the information. @PMOIndia
SG: We cannot be asked to furnish the information to satisfy someone's childish and irresponsible curiousity. Also, it should be noted that the info sought has nothing to do with his (Narendra Modi's) role as a public figure. @PMOIndia@ArvindKejriwal
TMC MP @jawharsircar on Law Ministry stating that differences of opinion between executive and judiciary are mutually reconciled: So am I to understand that all differences are mutually reconciled?...
...And in the same sentence you have used the words, "Only the appropriate person is appointed as a judge". Do you consider Victoria Gowri's appointment to really (be of) an appropriate person? One who has been accused in public of casteist remarks, of remarks against minorities?