Bombay High Court dismisses petition filed by Godrej and Boyce challenging land acquisition proceedings of State of Maharashtra for the Bullet Train Project.
Court: petitioner has not made out case for us to exercise our powers.
It is the paramount collective interest that would prevail and not private interest. Project would be first of its kind. Petition is dismissed.
Godrej seeks stay on protection to file an appeal in Supreme Court.
Seervai: When the land is taken away then the appeal will become infrictuous. I am not asking for a stay. I am just asking for a status quo. The project is no where near completion.
Seervai (for Godrej): Two weeks really can't prejudice.
ASG: I oppose. The land needs to be acquired.
Former AG opposes as well.
Court:There is no question of stay, even ad-interim relief at the very beginning was refused. No question of stay now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Rishab Shetty and Vijay Kiragandur, the director and producer respectively of Kannada movie Kantara move #SupremenCourt challenging anticipatory bail condition imposed by Kerala HC where production before IO on Sundays was mandated
The petitioners were booked for copyright infringement over the song Varaha Roopam
Sr Adv Ranjit Kumar appears for petitioners
CJI DY Chandrachud: We will take this up before we rise for today #SupremeCourt
CJI: you are using this music in Kantara?
Singh: yes they are saying it is from Vara Roopam
Justice PS Narasimha: But this is movie is there for a year #Kantara
Constitution bench of the #SupremeCourt Constitution Bench to deliver verdict on the petitions challenging the validity of the All India Bar Exam #AIBE
The three main issues which the judgment will answer are:
Can the Bar Council of India (BCI) prescribe a pre-enrolment exam as a condition precedent for enrolment?
Can BCI prescribe pre-enrolment training in terms of its training rules issued in 1995?
The last issue for consideration was: If a pre-enrolment exam is not permitted, can BCI prescribe a post-enrolment exam in alignment with Section 49 (1) (ah) of Advocates Act, 1961?
#SupremeCourt Constitution Bench of Justices Kaul, Khanna, Abhay S Oka, Vikram Nath and JK Maheshwari will deliver judgment on whether the #Bohra community has the right to excommunicate dissidents in exercise of its fundamental rights under Article 25 and 26 of the Constitution
The top court will lay down the law regarding the correctness of its 1962 judgment in Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin v. The State Of Bombay, in which it had protected the rights of the Bohra community to excommunicate members #SupremeCourt#Bohra
Court: Decision of constitution bench requires reconsideration. We have recorded reasons. There are two grounds.
Gujarat High Court reserves orders in a petition by Gujarat University challenging direction to furnish copies of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's degree certificate to Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the University argued before bench of Justice Biren Vaishnav.
SG: There is nothing to hide as the degree is there in public domain, on social media etc. But we cannot be compelled to disclose the information. @PMOIndia
SG: We cannot be asked to furnish the information to satisfy someone's childish and irresponsible curiousity. Also, it should be noted that the info sought has nothing to do with his (Narendra Modi's) role as a public figure. @PMOIndia@ArvindKejriwal
TMC MP @jawharsircar on Law Ministry stating that differences of opinion between executive and judiciary are mutually reconciled: So am I to understand that all differences are mutually reconciled?...
...And in the same sentence you have used the words, "Only the appropriate person is appointed as a judge". Do you consider Victoria Gowri's appointment to really (be of) an appropriate person? One who has been accused in public of casteist remarks, of remarks against minorities?