It also seemed that the U.S. credit markets were in the grips of a (fallacious) complacency, shown on the proportionally milder reaction of the "junk" bonds on the current tightening cycle.
But, can the #Fed support the markets in the current situation? We're not so sure. 2/
The good news was that the "zombie-corporation" problem seemed to be less severe than previously thought.
However, we also know that the ultra-easy monetary policies has created weak highly indebted firms. 3/
Retail sales of the U.S. economy have held up, somewhat, albeit they fell heavily after the Russo-Ukrainian war started, showing how international shocks can affect also the U.S. economy.
However, this had been due to excess savings accumulated during the Covid -era. 4/
Excess savings are currently depleting rapidly with all but collapsed personal saving rate. Most importantly, lending standards of banks are tightening rapidly and they now correspond levels seen during H1 2008.
This implies that the U.S. economy can face a 'sudden stop'. 5/
Considering the above, it's no surprise that consumer sentiment is in deeply recessionary levels. 6/
And, while the QT of the #FederalReserve keeps manipulating the yield curves, it should be noted that both 10y/3mo and 10y/2y spreads are currently heavily inverted.
The #recession signal of the yield curve is thus strong. 7/
Alas, we conclude in our recent Special Issue that, while the U.S. #recession has been postponed, it's still very much on the cards.
You think you know what happened during the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-2008?
The road to the GFC is long and complex. In its heart lies an innocent innovation to manage risks better, until authorities messed everything up.
The road to an (epic) financial crash. 🧵
Basically since the birth of banking, banks have been in the forefront of risk distribution through diversification and hedging. In the US, banks started to sell mortgage-backed debt obligations to investors already in the 1960s.
The idea was to distribute risk outside the balance sheet of banks, which would make more funds available for bank lending.
2/
In the late 1970s, Salomon Brothers and Bank of America Corporation started to securitize the mortgages by pooling together their interest payments and selling investors tranches based on their riskiness. The tranches became known as: junior, mezzanine and senior.
Junior was the most-risky one, but it also received the highest payments. Senior tranche was thought to be very safe. If there would be defaults on mortgages, all the other tranches would be wiped out before senior, effectively implying a collapse of the housing market.
Lewis Ranieri was a central figure in opening up the markets for mortgage-backed securities. 3/
The level of war-propaganda in Finland is massive.
@iltalehti_fi speculates that Russia is planning to restore the 1743 borders established in Treaty of Åbo to create a "buffer-zone". Russia would also strike Helsinki with missiles.
And there's much more. 1/13🧵
Just six months ago, our government-funded (propaganda) channel @yleuutiset notified that Russian military bases near Finland are nearly empty.
I guess Russia plans to attack Finland "with shovels". 2/
Continuing on the first note, @iltasanomat (our second largest daily newspaper) has just published a lengthy article (for subscribers only) on where Finns should evacuate in the case of a war.
Preparation is required "because of Russia". We did not have this "problem" before. 3/
Russia and Israel are treated totally differently in spite of the fact that both are waging wars of invasion. The major difference is that while Russia is engaged in an existential war, Israel is waging a war of expansion.
Thread on Russia vs. Israel. 🧵1/12
For an untrained eye, it may appear that the motivation behind both wars, in Ukraine and the Middle East (Gaza/Lebanon/Syria), would be the same: threat.
The difference is in the level of threat experienced.
2/
The start of the second phase of the Ukrainian military conflict in February 2022 was presented to us as an over-reaction by Kremlin. The invasion was painted as an un-provoked attack of Russia to a friendly neighbor.
In reality NATO had fought a war of provocation towards Russia since the fall of the Soviet Union in early 1990s. 3/
A friend asked me sometime ago, how do I always attract women everyone wants to f*ck. The simple answer: just be a fucking man.
Your looks and content of your wallet are irrelevant to non-toxic classy women, which you want into your life. But, you need to be brutally picky. 1/
Even in the deepest depths of my depression in my teenage years, I did not settle. I knew what I wanted. Never settle. ☝️
This means that you need to spend extended perios of time alone, because top-class women do not want a womanizer either. Be comfortable in your own skin.
2/
Classy women want someone they can trust. Like the blonde in the picture told me some time ago, "your woman needs to understand that there's always interested women around, but that I always come home after the evening".
Your word is the only thing you got. Protect it.
3/
If it holds true that NATO has struck Russia with a tactical nuclear weapon, we would have entered a very dangerous world.
First of all, the whole nuclear deterrence policy of Russia would have been thrown out of the window. Some excepts from my article: Strategical asymmetry in a game theoretical model of a tactical nuclear first strike. 1/5 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Most importantly, if the analysis of @cirnosad is correct, as I start to believe it is (no personal expertise, though), we would have entered an era of nuclear warfare, with horrendous implications. Another excerpt from my article. 2/5
Researchers on nuclear warfare and deterrence have feared this step (tactical nuclear strike) for a very long time, because it changes how wars are fought. If the analysis of @cirnosad holds true, a nuclear attack to a major city is only a matter of time.
3/5
The fraudulence of the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank. 🧵1/12
The #FederalReserve has accrued massive “paper” losses. How does it handle these?
Source: The Fed’s Remittances to the Treasury: Explaining the 'Deferred Asset'
The Fed is currently arguing that these gargantuan deficits (losses) do not to matter, because it can accrue seigniorage revenue (from its money 'printing'; see my post to subscribers here) ad infinitum. So, it claims to be solvent despite of these losses.
2/
The European Central Bank has taken a similar policy stance, labelling the losses as deferred assets, which “will be carried forward on the ECB’s balance sheet to be offset against future profits.” 3/ ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/…