So much wrong with this article: "The doctor asked not to be named because the hospital where they work has not given them permission to speak to the media" and said a specialist would have to do the who could do the "complicated and risky" termination. cnn.com/2023/02/08/hea…
We can't get details because the hospital won't let the doctor speak to the media, but we're supposed to believe that Beth's life was more at risk carrying her pregnancy to term rather than having a "complicated and risky" abortion at 17 or more weeks gestation?
The couple was told there was no chance for the baby to survive long after delivery, but that may not be true. And why an abortion at 21 weeks when a C-section could be done if Beth's health deteriorated? #abortion ban pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17186342/
It's also interesting that the couple did acknowledge that the abortion killed their child and they grieved deeply. They had been prepared to raise a severely disabled child, but the docts convinced them there was no hope for survival and that it would essentially be euthanasia.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
