A. To get a feeling for the viral dynamics—and terminal shortsightedness of national-level policy worldwide—, play around with the great @nextstrain databases.
You cannot work on policy questions whose underlying dynamics you don't understand. It matters. nextstrain.org/ncov/gisaid/gl…
A. We've been over all this more times than I care to count over these three long years. This is a leisurely, evolving thread to offer teasers to anyone who reads.
"Meaning is use": Language never speaks for itself. The magic lies in how we use it. Basics
A. I don't mean to criticize (anymore) or shock people out of complacency. If at all, it's coincidental. No one who slept through three years will rethink thanks to anything I say.
Such threads help us learn and share in public to gain clarity of thought.
A. You don't need to use HIV parallels to explain SARS.
Yet if you don't learn from 40 years of HIV medicine, I can guarantee you will be too slow, given the staggering rates of SARS-CoV-2 evolution and genetic recombination.
A. We learn: (1) Doctors who want to help patients will use the best tools. These are HIV T cell depletion tests to diagnose #LongCovid. China even 'has a cure', an old HIV first-line drug repurposed.
Why does no one talk about this? (2) Western hubris.
A. Oh well. #A came out stronger than intended, but you get the point. Good systems thinking practice: if you meet resistance - as you do - it can signal that you've reached a high-leverage point and just need to keep pushing for impact. With Dana Meadows, donellameadows.org/archives/lever…
A. What functional name for SARS-CoV-2?
No pun intended! Governments are asking for it. If they let it ripriprip for a few more years, real PR magic will be needed to turn things around if/when desired.
Like HIV at the time, almost certainly a new name.
A. #AirborneAIDS is confronting, but can be good cognitive public health policy: (1) People deserve words they can understand, to give informed consent to shortened lives; or (2) protect themselves. (3) They need to work for LMIC and people who don't read.
A. Perhaps counterintuitively, you have to have rigorous test & trace in place to make vaccines and drugs work. The best HIV drugs repurposed for SARS will be useless if patients are not diagnosed and never introduced to care.
In #A we saw immunological harm from SARS, a betacoronavirus perfected over millions of years to establish viral reservoirs that evade innate and adaptive host immune system through its unique replication process.
B. A cruel disease, sCJD strikes patients out of nowhere, like the hand of God - hence the 'spontaneous' in sCJD.
As ever, we can eliminate any and all SARS-Associated Neurodegenerative Disease (~SAND) by eliminating COVID-19 just like SARS 2003. However, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creutzfel…
B. The 99% seem wildly determined to tempt God by "Living with COVID" policy.
We are here to remind you: you focus on the right lever, but confidently push it IN THE WRONG DIRECTION as Jay Forrester foresaw.
B. I can't go into more detail because the necessary research isn't published, or even done yet. It may be months to years for autopsy results to be come in.
Fortunately, you don't need to wait before taking strong action: use the precautionary principle.
B. This is no goosechase but scicomm, and a hands-on thread, so let's repeat this stark warning:
Coronavirus vaccines can protect animal hosts, but not humans, permanently because the human immune system was created with a weakness to human coronaviruses.
B. Not all navigate twitter at ease - and yes, we/I should switch to long-form shortly.
Above reference is this stroke of genius by Meaghan Kall, one of the louder minimizers - I genuinely think they are just imaginatively/cognitively limited, not evil.
B. Why does integrated analysis matter—however you organize your personal ABC?
Because complexity is high enough for us to lose common ground - and shared social trust - if/as institutions fail more visibly and impactfully. One example concludes letter B:
2. States are misinformed. I don’t even mean ‘corrupt’ in @RealCheckMarker’s epidemiological sense.
The present dysfunction is what you expect in ANY problem that requires learning, cooperation and changing deeply held beliefs in millions if not billions.
3. This is important to get right with surgical precision, because if we want a cure, we need to understand the precise mechanisms by which the disease is caused and relieved.
1. @49security is a @GermanyDiplo@GPPi platform. Didn't followed the discussion, but much appreciate the essays. Yet, critically, as discussed previously with @thorstenbenner: you all misunderstand SARS pathogenesis. Even this biodefense essay!
People here comment “How can Chinese delegates wear masks if the pandemic ended”, but I’m more surprised that the basics physics of disease transmission are not understood.
2. SARS is an intelligence or empathy test, we’ve long been saying - astonishingly few people pass. Low survival skills. - I’ll now settle for basic common sense test.
3. “Living with Covid”: The conductor told me that less than 10 people out of a max. of 703 on this train are wearing masks (German ICE). You also regularly see 1-5% in Berlin mask wearers in public transit, possibly even fewer in other German cities. 😈👏 de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICE_1
Aviation drives the COVID-19 pandemic and climate breakdown.
Quarantine of intercontinental travelers at airports will (1) stop the pandemic - no need for lockdowns - and (2) buy time to rebuild supply chains for climate (IHR 2005).
2. This is how pandemics are ended in the modern age. It is harder now than in SARS 2003, given higher international mobility and a more rapidly evolving pathogen.
3. Scholars, where are you in THE public health question of our times? SARS is a neurocognitive problem. Damage is cumulative and progressive; ignoring is not an option.
It's been eeriely quiet in the intellectual department!?
Thanks to @RealCheckMarker for warning most consistently, as the precautionary principle suggests.
3. Critically, this polemical lecture. I'm not sure I'd recommend following along, as I think it fails to follow the precautionary principle; but could also be rigorous scientific argument - you be the judge. Anecdote from the start of the eyeborne plague: bmjophth.bmj.com/content/7/1/e0…